Skip to content

· Private foundation

Katten Muchin Rosenman Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$587k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$234k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$2.0MPhilanthropy$1.5MHealth$1.3MEducation$1.2MArts & Culture$786kCivil Rights$784kHuman Services$543kRecreation & Sports$322kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $220k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $334k
$20,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$629k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED JEWISH APPEAL FEDERATION$233,500
YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES$50,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES$50,000
CHICAGO LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS$34,625
WEST SIDE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER$30,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$30,000
RILEY'S WAY FOUNDATION (THE CALL FOR KINDNESS)$25,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON$25,000
CHARLOTTE CENTER FOR LEGAL ADVOCACY$25,000
B'NAI BRITH MEN'S CAMP ASSOCIATION$20,000
COPE FOUNDATION INC$10,000
CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION CHICAGO CHAPTER$10,000
HUMAN RIGHTS INITIATIVE OF NORTH TEXAS INC$10,000
LEGAL AID SOCIETY (NEW YORK)$8,500
NEW YORK LAWYERS FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $586k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%AUTONATION FOUNDATION: $25k → 13%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $12k → 21%EMPOWER THE VILLAGE INC: $15k → 4%JOHNNY MAC SOLDIERS FUND: $5k → 4%FOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $10k → 21%INSTITUTE OF WELL BEING IN LAW: $25k → 8%INSTITUTE OF WELL BEING IN LAW: $25k → 8%INSTITUTE OF WELL BEING IN LAW: $25k → 8%DC SAFE: $4k → 14%NETWORK FOR VICTIM RECOVERY OF DC: $3k → 14%SALESMANSHIP CLUB CHARITABLE GOLF DALLAS: $14k → 14%DC SAFE: $3k → 14%CHICAGO WHITE SOX CHARITIES: $5k → 14%HUMAN RIGHTS INITIATIVE OF NORTH TEXAS INC: $10k → 14%CHICAGO WHITE SOX CHARITIES: $5k → 14%CAMP KESEM NATIONAL: $5k → 14%INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $4k → 14%INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $4k → 14%SAFE ALLIANCE: $8k → 10%CAMP KESEM NATIONAL: $3k → 14%100 WOMEN IN FINANCE FOUNDATION: $35k → 17%SAFE ALLIANCE: $5k → 10%100 WOMEN IN FINANCE FOUNDATION: $35k → 17%SUPPORTIVE HOUSING COMMUNITIES: $3k → 10%100 WOMEN IN FINANCE FOUNDATION: $35k → 17%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS: $13k → 14%100 WOMEN IN FINANCE FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%RIDE ON THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP: $5k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS: $10k → 14%BONEI OLAM: $10k → 20%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS: $8k → 14%SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES: $4k → 17%SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES: $4k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $25k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $5k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $5k → 14%KETCHUM - DOWNTOWN YMCA: $5k → 14%SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES: $4k → 17%KETCHUM - DOWNTOWN YMCA: $5k → 14%CAMP KESEM: $10k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $50k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE: $5k → 14%AYUDA: $5k → 14%HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE: $8k → 17%INVEST FOR KIDS: $10k → 14%INVEST FOR KIDS: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.4M · 236 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

236 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 222 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

236
333

Total granted

$8.4M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+13%

Still filing today

74%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    5× · 2020–2024 · $571k · revenue +13%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $360k · revenue +46%
  • LA
    LEGAL AID CHICAGO
    4× · 2020–2023 · $301k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC
    one grant, 2020 · $86k · revenue -54%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN RED CROSS ( NORTH CAROLINA REGION )
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • CL
    CHICAGO LAWYERS COMM FOR CIVIL RIGHTS
    one grant, 2020 · $47k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
2
Twin Cities Diversity in Practice

To attract, recruit, advance, and retain attorneys of color in the twin cities through education and collaboration with member organizations.

Community Improvement
3
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
4
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
Counselors of Real Estate

Cre was established exclusively for real estate advisors who provide intelligent, unbiased, and trusted advice for a client or employer. the purpose of the organization is to serve as an information resource and to provide its members with…

Community Improvement
7
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
8
American Arbitration Association Inc

The american arbitration association ("aaa") is dedicated to effective, efficient and economical methods of dispute resolution through education, technology and solutions-oriented service.

Crime & Legal
9
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
10
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
11
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
12
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Local Initiatives Support Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Mission Pow-Mia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

383 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 383 of the 581 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
72
Early backer (in before they grew)
376/383
Grantees still filing
264/383
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $207,500 · OtherNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS: $195,800 · OtherCRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $193,366 · OtherHELP FOR CHILDREN: $170,000 · OtherNATIONAL IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CENTER: $160,000 · Other+109 more: $3,215,359 · Other+109 moreLEGAL AID CHICAGO: $301,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL AID CHICA…Chicago Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law Inc: $221,000 · Crime & LegalChicago Lawyers…Charlotte Center for Legal Advocacy Inc: $145,200 · Crime & LegalCharlotte Cente…PUBLIC COUNSEL: $140,000 · Crime & LegalPUBLIC COUNSELVOLUNTEERS OF LEGAL SERVICE INC: $103,250 · Crime & LegalVOLUNTEERS OF L…LEGAL SERVICES NYC: $76,500 · Crime & LegalLEGAL SERVICES …THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $61,000 · Crime & LegalPublic Interest Law Initiative: $45,000 · Crime & Legal+5 more: $96,639 · Crime & Legal+5 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $571,310 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED…UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $360,230 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH…CHICAGO UNITED: $40,000 · Philanthropy+6 more: $90,514 · Philanthropy+6 moreTHE CHICAGO BAR FOUNDATION: $135,515 · EducationTHE CHICA…BREAKTHROUGH NEW YORK INC: $77,500 · EducationBREAKTHRO…ACADEMY FOR URBAN SCHOOL LEADERSHIP: $75,000 · EducationACADEMY F…HER JUSTICE INC: $56,050 · EducationHER JUSTI…The University of Texas Law School Foundation: $55,000 · EducationThe Unive…FOLDS OF HONOR NEW YORK INC: $40,000 · EducationFOLDS OF …AFTER SCHOOL MATTERS INC: $30,000 · EducationGARDENEERS: $30,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION: $29,100 · EducationSTANFORD PROFESSIONALS IN REAL ESTATE INC: $25,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Education+8 more: $130,000 · Education+8 moreCHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC: $150,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO T…RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $138,500 · Arts & CultureRAVINIA F…HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $80,200 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST…SIGNATURE THEATRE COMPANY INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureSIGNATURE…NAVY PIER INC: $55,000 · Arts & CultureNAVY PIER…MUSICARES FOUNDATION INC: $35,500 · Arts & CultureLAWYERS FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS: $32,500 · Arts & CultureDALLAS THEATER CENTER: $30,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $30,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more: $88,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more100 WOMEN IN FINANCE FOUNDATION: $130,000 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE FOR WELL-BEING IN LAW: $75,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles: $65,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $31,500 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $25,000 · Human ServicesAUTONATION FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesYMCA of Metropolitan Detroit: $22,000 · Human ServicesInvest for Kids Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesCORPORATE COUNSEL WOMEN OF COLOR: $19,800 · Human ServicesCamp Kesem National: $18,000 · Human Services+5 more: $64,900 · Human ServicesGATEWAY FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $80,000 · HealthEASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REGION: $77,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION - CHICAGO CHAPTER: $55,000 · HealthTHE HONORABLE TINA BROZMAN FDTN INC: $35,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $33,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $32,000 · HealthLUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · HealthMorgan Pressel Foundation Inc: $25,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $24,900 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $23,800 · HealthHOSPITALITY HOUSE OF CHARLOTTE: $16,600 · Health+3 more: $38,500 · Health
Other$4,142,025Crime & Legal$1,189,589Philanthropy$1,062,054Education$733,165Arts & Culture$714,700Human Services$496,200Health$470,800

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $571,310 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $360,230 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLEGAL AID CHICAGO: $301,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetChicago Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law Inc: $221,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS: $195,800 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetCHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC: $150,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCharlotte Center for Legal Advocacy Inc: $145,200 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetPUBLIC COUNSEL: $140,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $138,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHICAGO BAR FOUNDATION: $135,515 over 4y, 1.1% of budget100 WOMEN IN FINANCE FOUNDATION: $130,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetBERNICE & PHILIP FRIEZE FUND INC: $120,004 over 4y, 12% of budgetCouncil for Childrens Rights Inc: $116,948 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF LEGAL SERVICE INC: $103,250 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $94,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $85,709 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $80,200 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetGATEWAY FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $80,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH NEW YORK INC: $77,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REGION: $77,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES NYC: $76,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE: $76,238 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR WELL-BEING IN LAW: $75,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetACADEMY FOR URBAN SCHOOL LEADERSHIP: $75,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSIGNATURE THEATRE COMPANY INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWINGS PROGRAM INC: $65,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles: $65,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $61,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE: $60,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHER JUSTICE INC: $56,050 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNAVY PIER INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION - CHICAGO CHAPTER: $55,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetThe University of Texas Law School Foundation: $55,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZENS BUDGET COMMISSION INC: $53,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $52,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Minority Corporate Counsel Association Inc: $50,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNorthwestern University: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPublic Interest Law Initiative: $45,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetNew York Lawyers for the Public Interest Inc: $43,300 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WARREN CENTER INC: $40,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR NEW YORK INC: $40,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetCHICAGO UNITED: $40,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetHOPE IGNITES CHICAGO: $40,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTeach Democracy: $39,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN SWISS FOUNDATION: $38,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $36,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMUSICARES FOUNDATION INC: $35,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sidley Austin FoundationIL99.7× affinity59 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sidley Austin Foundation · Perkins Coie Foundation · United Way Miami Inc · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Quinn Emanuel Foundation · The Gibson Dunn & Crutcher Foundation · Equal Justice Works · Circle of Service Foundation · The Morrison & Foerster Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Mc Dermott Will and Emery Charitable Foundation · Weil Gotshal & Manges Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Katten Muchin Rosenman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Katten Muchin Rosenman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
62report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Katten Muchin Rosenman Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Katten Muchin Rosenman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 581 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Katten Muchin Rosenman’s filings →

More from the funding graph