· Private foundation
Joyce and Irving Goldman Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of JOYCE AND IRVING GOLDMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $48k
- $10k–50k76 grants · $1.8M
- $50k–250k36 grants · $3.1M
- $250k+7 grants · $3.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE | $700,000 |
| WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART | $600,000 |
| AJC | $400,000 |
| WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS | $400,000 |
| NATIONAL BREAST CANCER COALITION FUND | $350,000 |
| UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK | $300,000 |
| CONGREGATION B'NAI JESHURUN | $250,000 |
| MEM GLOBAL (FORMERLY MOISHE HOUSE) | $200,000 |
| UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM | $150,000 |
| REBOOT | $150,000 |
| IJS | $150,000 |
| ARNOLD P GOLD FOUNDATION | $135,000 |
| ABORTION ACTION MISSOURI FOUNDATION | $130,000 |
| URBAN SCHOOL FOOD ALLIANCE | $125,000 |
| MOMENT MAGAZINE | $125,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
157 repeat relationships — 85 still active in FY2024, 72 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $858k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WMWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART6× · 2019–2024 · $3.1M · revenue +101%
- AFAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC6× · 2019–2024 · $2.9M · revenue +58%
- ALANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE6× · 2019–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +47%
Funded once
- CCCITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORKone grant, 2019 · $200k
- NYNEW YORK - PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITALone grant, 2019 · $100k
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER INCone grant, 2023 · $61k · revenue -59%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Election Reformers Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
237 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 237 of the 286 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
- Who funds AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BREAST CANCER COALITION FUND ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CREATIVE CHANGE ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE ARNOLD GOLD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
- Who funds REBOOT INC ↗
- Who funds FOODCORPS INC ↗
- Who funds UPSTART BAY AREA ↗
- Who funds PECONIC LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds ONETABLE INC ↗
- Who funds 2164 INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL YOUNG FARMERS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds MOISHE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds URBAN SCHOOL FOOD ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITHFAMILYCOM INC ↗
- Who funds TRYBAL GATHERINGS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COALITION BUILDING INSTITU ↗
- Who funds AVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds AMBER WAVES FARM INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC ↗
- Who funds ADAMAH INC ↗
- Who funds INNOVATION AFRICA ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Jewish Farmer Network ↗
- Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Goldman-Sonnenfeldt Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc · Fjc · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Covenant Foundation · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Joyce and Irving Goldman Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Massaro Community Farm Inc — 27% of income from government
- Foodcorps Inc — 21% of income from government
- The Broad Institute Inc — 19% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc — 10% of income from government
- Adamah Inc — 10% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc — 3% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- Simmons University — 1% of income from government
- All Our Kin Inc — 1% of income from government
- Milton Academy — 0% of income from government
- The Vermont Community Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Williams College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.