Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Diablo Valley Foundation For The Aging

Diablo Valley Foundation For The Aging (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $14,740 to it, the largest being WR Berkley Corporation Charitable Foundation ($6,600). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2026
$-3604
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$15k
Net assets
$0
1/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 3%
01What it does

What Diablo Valley Foundation For The Aging does

Mission

Founded by a group of Community leaders including Dean S. Lesher, former publisher of the Contra Costa Times, and Katherine M. Grant, a social worker, the Foundation is committed to providing vital services to aging persons who are at risk because they are alone, isolated, pressed by financial problems, or are confused. The focus of DVFA is to prevent inappropriate institutionalization of elders by providing them the necessary support to maintain them in community.

As stated on its FY2026 Form 990.

Program

  1. DVFA has served over 5,000 older adults in Contra Costa county and has continued to be a leading agency in senior services. Fiduciary services and money management is one of the major service components. DVFA serves as a representative under a durable power of attorney program in the event of an emergency or decline in health. Executor, Trustee, and conservatory services are also available.

    $5,452 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990. Program spending in total: $5,452.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($637k) Expenses 100 ($648k) Net assets 100 ($874k)2018 Revenue 100 ($640k) Expenses 95 ($613k) Net assets 100 ($870k)2019 Revenue 91 ($577k) Expenses 112 ($727k) Net assets 79 ($688k)2020 Revenue 87 ($551k) Expenses 130 ($839k) Net assets 40 ($350k)2021 Revenue 119 ($760k) Expenses 112 ($725k) Net assets 48 ($421k)2022 Revenue 119 ($760k) Expenses 146 ($945k) Net assets 24 ($208k)2023 Revenue 106 ($672k) Expenses 118 ($766k) Net assets 13 ($115k)2024 Revenue 24 ($153k) Expenses 44 ($285k) Net assets 5 ($47k)2025 Revenue 0 ($3) Expenses 6 ($36k) Net assets 1 ($11k)2026 Revenue -1 ($-3604) Expenses 1 ($7k) Net assets 0 ($0)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Revenue (-1)Expenses (1)Net assets (0)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $979k to $716k (−27%).

$1.0M
$991k
$979k
$716k
$454k
$249k
$115k
$115k
$100k
$0
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 2% · 2021 18% · 2022 4% · 2023 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 8 of the last 10 reported years ran a deficit.

−$11k
’17
$27k
’18
−$149k
’19
−$288k
’20
$36k
’21
−$185k
’22
−$93k
’23
−$132k
’24
−$36k
’25
−$11k
’26
2.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2017 and FY2018, and between the FY2018 and FY2019 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Listed10111312111211111111
Joined·+2+5+2+0+2+0+0+0+0
No longer listed·133111000
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base narrowed from 4 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $14k → $28.

1 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 1% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Diablo Valley Foundation For The Aging’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Diablo Valley Foundation For The Aging leans on a few funders — its largest provides 45% of grant income and the top three 96%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

38% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Diablo Valley Foundation For The Aging.

45%
largest funder
96%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 47% · 2021 100% · 2022 90% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

55% of Diablo Valley Foundation For The Aging's grant income comes from California funders.

CA
DE

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’22
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $140 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like Diablo Valley Foundation For The Aging

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

77% of spending goes to programs.

Program 77%Management 23%Fundraising 0%

Governance

11
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

53%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Diablo Valley Foundation For The Aging: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Diablo Valley Foundation For The Aging?
Diablo Valley Foundation For The Aging (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $14,740 to it, the largest being WR Berkley Corporation Charitable Foundation ($6,600). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Diablo Valley Foundation For The Aging have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $14,740 in grants to Diablo Valley Foundation For The Aging, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Diablo Valley Foundation For The Aging?
WR Berkley Corporation Charitable Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $6,600 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Diablo Valley Foundation For The Aging find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Diablo Valley Foundation For The Aging →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2026 (financials across 2017–2026), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing