· Public charity
John Burton Advocates for Youth
John Burton Advocates for Youth (jbay) improves the quality of life for youth in california who have been in foster care or homeless by advocating for better laws, training communities to strengthen local practices and conducting research to inform policy solutions.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $114k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $199k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Community College Fdn | $80,000 |
| Sierra Joint Community Colleg | $43,485 |
| Bill Wilson Center | $39,000 |
| Lutheran Social Services | $39,000 |
| Los Angeles Valley College Fo | $20,000 |
| San Francisco CASA | $20,000 |
| Cabrillo College Foundation | $17,680 |
| Feather River Community Colle | $10,000 |
| Imperial Community College Di | $10,000 |
| San Diego Youth Services | $9,000 |
| Safe Place for Youth | $9,000 |
| Star Vista | $9,000 |
| Family Assistance Program | $9,000 |
| Los Angeles LGBT Center | $9,000 |
| San Francisco Foster Youth | $9,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
28 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $116k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IIiFoster Inc3× · 2020–2024 · $398k · revenue +115%
- TWTOGETHER WE RISE2× · 2020–2021 · $225k · revenue +52%
- CCCOMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION4× · 2022–2025 · $207k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- RIRYSE INCone grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue -13%
- SCSocial Change Partners LLCone grant, 2022 · $43k
- OTON THE MOVEone grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The foundation's mission is to benefit, support, and enhance the missions of the california community college system.
Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…
The mission of san mateo county community colleges foundation is to promote student success and program innovation by providing financial support to help san mateo county community college district students achieve their goals. the…
Berkeley Community Scholars empowers Berkeley youth who face racial, economic, and other barriers to achieving their college dreams by providing a unique experience of scholarships, advising, mentoring, and a community of support.
Southwestern College Foundation is dedicated to raising friends and funds that support all aspects of educational advancement at Southwestern College.
Provide resources to support Golden West College and the community by advancing education and opportunity for all students.
To raise private philanthropic gifts that improve student success and help prepare an educated workforce through scholarships, emergency grants, and college program support.
The cuesta college foundation supports the excellence of cuesta college by engaging the community and building philanthropic resources. the funds raised and managed by the foundation strengthen college programs, provide educational…
To develop resources and relationships that provide financial support to los medanos college students through student scholarships, student programs and services, instructional supplies, and facility improvements.
To support the success of the students, programs, and colleges of the los angeles community college district and to advance access to postsecondary education and training in the greater los angeles region.
The Ventura College Foundation transforms students lives through education by providing innovative and vital resources and financial support. The Foundation collaborates with Ventura College to enhance human potential, civic engagement,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community College Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds iFoster Inc ↗
- Who funds TOGETHER WE RISE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITE-LA INC ↗
- Who funds BILL WILSON CENTER ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds Educational Results Partnership ↗
- Who funds PIVOTAL CONNECTIONS ↗
- Who funds RYSE INC ↗
- Who funds San Francisco CASA ↗
- Who funds FIRST STAR INC ↗
- Who funds NEW WAYS TO WORK INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds ON THE MOVE ↗
- Who funds THE URBAN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL ALTERNATIVES ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Elevate Community Services Inc ↗
- Who funds Contra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc ↗
- Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds Family Assistance Program ↗
- Who funds M F PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOSTER YOUTH FUND ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER ↗
- Who funds StarVista ↗
- Who funds WIND YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Youth for Change ↗
- Who funds FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds MARYVALE ↗
- Who funds Focus Forward ↗
- Who funds THINK OF US ↗
- Who funds Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Foundation for California Community Colleges · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Community Initiatives · United Way of the Bay Area · Walter S Johnson Foundation · California Community Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Truth Initiative Foundation · Tipping Point Community · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · The California Endowment · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization John Burton Advocates for Youth funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.