Loading…
· Public charity
JOB OPPORTUNITIES TASK FORCE INC
Develop and advocate policies & programs to increase the skills, job opportunities, and incomes of low-skill, low-income workers and job seekers.
$519k
Granted FY2025
1
Grants
1
Communities
$519k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of JOB OPPORTUNITIES TASK FORCE INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
paid sicksick leave
2022
subgrants johnsjohns hopkinshopkins innovationinnovation safety
2023
subgrants johnsjohns hopkinshopkins innovationinnovation safety
2025
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2025 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$518,630
Median grant
1
States reached
$580k
Total assets
Largest grants
- BE THE REVOLUTION LLC (B-360)$518,630
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $836k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19% — the area typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 6 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +278% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
6
3
Total granted
$2.1M
$52k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+278%
+14%
Still filing today
83%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPublic BenefitCrime & LegalEmploymentCommunity ImprovementOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCASH CAMPAIGN OF MARYLAND2× · 2018–2019 · $836k · revenue +345% · 36% of their budget
- BOBE ORG INC2× · 2022–2023 · $79k · revenue +651% · 26% of their budget
- IAI AM MENTALITY2× · 2022–2023 · $79k · revenue +278%
Funded once
- JFJOBS FOR THE FUTUREgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $35k · revenue +152%
- GCGARRETT COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTIONone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +12%
- PNPROSPERITY NOWone grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue +14%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Leadership Maryland Inc
Building a better maryland takes a special kind of strength-the kind of strength you'll find every day in leaders throughout our local businesses and communities. at leadership maryland, we harness that strength by bringing together local…
Public Benefit
2
Junior Achievement of
Inspire and prepare young people to be career- ready, entrepreneurial, and financially responsible citizens.
International
3
Progressive Maryland Inc
To educate and organize the public to improve the quality of life for working families.
Human Services
4
Metropolitan Baltimore Council of
The mission of the metropolititan baltimore council afl-cio unions is to improve the lives of working families to bring economic justice to the workplace and social justice to our state and the nation.
—
5
Jane Addams Resource Corporation -
Promote strong communities, businesses and households to ensure that people who work do not live in poverty
Employment
6
Justice Jobs of Maryland Inc
Helping job seekers with barriers to employment get a job, keep that job, and move up to better jobs
Employment
7
Maryland Center On Economic Policy Inc
The maryland center on economic policy advances innovative policy ideas to foster broad prosperity and help our state be the standard-bearer for responsible public policy.
Social Science
8
Business Volunteers Maryland Inc
Inspire volunteerism and connect motivated people and businesses to nonprofit organizations leading to stronger communities. our programs connect the right people with the right organizations.
Community Improvement
9
Washington County Leadership
Provide leadership development programs to enhance economic development and the quality of life in washington county, maryland.
Education
10
Greater Baltimore Committee Inc
To provide a strong, unified and effective voice for the business community in the functional area of urban affairs and public policy, business services and information, and economic development, thereby promoting the Baltimore Region as…
—
11
Baltimore Corps Inc
To enlist talent to accelerate social innovation in baltimore and advance a citywide agenda for equity and racial justice.
Employment
12
Philadelphia Area Jobs With Justice
Building support for the rights of working people through coalitions of labor and community and through public education.
Employment
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is I Am Mentality Inc and the most unlike its peers is Garrett County Maryland Community. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$986,272Human Services$835,926Youth Development$158,334Public Benefit$73,885Crime & Legal$45,833Employment$34,556Community Improvement$7,500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The United Way of Central Maryland IncMD15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation JOB OPPORTUNITIES TASK FORCE INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Garrett County Maryland Community — 30% of income from government
- Cash Campaign of Maryland Inc — 11% of income from government
- Jobs for the Future Inc — 11% of income from government
- Public Justice Center Inc — 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CASH CAMPAIGN OF MARYLAND.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.4× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 814607977 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on CASH CAMPAIGN OF MARYLAND, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 36% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Job Opportunities Task Force Inc?
Find your warmest path to Job Opportunities Task Force Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines