Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Intermountain Front Range Inc

Helping people live the healthiest lives possible.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$901k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$11MHuman Services$608kFood & Nutrition$203kEducation$132kRecreation & Sports$55kInternational$51kHousing & Shelter$40kPhilanthropy$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 12 grants below total $1,464,015 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,976,781 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $512,766 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $96k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$901,070
GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$365,445
BENEFITS IN ACTION$96,000
JEFFERSON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH$35,000
SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER$15,000
VIA MOBILITY SERVICES$10,000
ST LOUIS CATHOLIC PARISH IN LOUISVILLE$8,700
COAL CREEK MEALS ON WHEELS$8,000
A PRECIOUS CHILD INC$7,500
COLORADO PERSONALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAM FOR PHYSICIANS$6,000
BROOMFIELD FISH$5,800
MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERS$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $625k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SENIORS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $25k → 12%BROOMFIELD FISH: $15k → 5%BROOMFIELD FISH: $10k → 5%BROOMFIELD FISH: $8k → 5%A PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $8k → 5%A PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $7k → 5%BROOMFIELD FISH: $6k → 5%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 12%BENEFITS IN ACTION: $96k → 7%BENEFITS IN ACTION: $46k → 7%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 12%WISH FOR WHEELS INC: $5k → 12%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 12%BENEFITS IN ACTION: $42k → 7%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 12%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER: $12k → 12%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 12%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 12%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $150k → 12%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $15k → 12%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $15k → 12%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $15k → 12%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $12k → 12%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $10k → 12%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $10k → 12%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $10k → 12%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $9k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 21 repeat orgs$685k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
36

Total granted

$12M
$671k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+2%

Still filing today

100%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LM
    LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5.7M · revenue +142% · 29% of their budget
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    3× · 2017–2020 · $248k · revenue +33%
  • MC
    METRO COMMUNITY PROVIDER NETWORK INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $235k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue +2%
  • DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $75k · revenue +168%
  • BG
    Big Green
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue -29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Colorado Health Foundation
Health
2
Colorado Digital Health

Prime health advances health justice, equity, access quality and cost through innovation, collaboration, and community building.

Health
3
Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation

The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.

Health
4
Clinica Colorado

To provide equitable primary health care and resources to those with limited access across colorado, especially to those who are uninsured.

Health
5
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
6
Colorado Health Network Inc
Health
7
Center for Improving Value in Health Care

To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…

Health
8
Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council

Cbhc's mission is to support community resilience, guide behavioral health innovation, and enhance individual well-being throughout colorado by supporting colorado's community behavioral health safety net providers.

Health
9
Vail Health Services

Vail health services is the parent company of a group of companies generally known as vail health, whose mission is to elevate health across our mountain communities.

Health
10
Healthteamworks

Healthteamworks collaboratively transforms health care through performance improvement, organization development, and training, resulting in strengthened communities and person-centered, high-quality care.

Community Improvement
11
Pueblo Community Health Center Inc

To provide primary health care to those in need by offering top quality care through accessibility, leadership, and financial independence.

12
Hospice of Metro Denver Inc

To encircle those facing advanced illness with unprecedented levels of comfort, compassion, and expertise.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Interfaith Network On Mental Illness. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%2%<5yr15%2%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr18%25%20–35yr12%27%35–55yr13%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%2%<5yr15%0%5–10yr19%47%10–20yr18%41%20–35yr12%6%35–55yr13%6%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%2/62
the rest of the field
13%
1,871/13,961

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/56
Grantees still filing
37/56
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $5,691,570 · HealthLUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONGOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $4,858,338 · HealthGOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION+14 more — $755,773 · Health+14 moreBENEFITS IN ACTION — $184,102 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesSISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $111,917 · Human ServicesVia Mobility Services — $95,692 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SERVICES OF BROOMFIELD — $38,300 · Human ServicesSENIORS' RESOURCE CENTER INC — $25,000 · Human Services+2 more — $19,508 · Human ServicesDENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION — $75,000 · OtherJEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER — $68,000 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF BOULDER COUNTY INC — $41,225 · OtherHospital Sisters Mission Outreach Corporation — $39,493 · OtherJEFFERSON COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $30,000 · OtherARVADA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $25,000 · OtherMOUNT ST VINCENT HOME INC — $16,930 · Other+16 more — $181,899 · OtherCOLLEGE TRACK — $60,000 · EducationDENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $24,520 · EducationBICYCLE COLORADO — $15,000 · EducationCOLORADO PERSONALIZED EDUCATION — $6,000 · EducationTHE WHITE ROSE FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SAINT MARY INC — $6,000 · EducationINROADS INC — $5,220 · EducationBig Green — $30,000 · Food & NutritionCOAL CREEK MEALS ON WHEELS — $24,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC — $17,000 · Food & NutritionYOUNG AMERICANS CENTER FOR FINANCIAL EDUCATION — $40,000 · Recreation & SportsMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC — $25,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Health$11,305,681Human Services$624,519Other$477,547Education$122,740Food & Nutrition$71,000Recreation & Sports$40,000Philanthropy$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $5,691,570 over 8y, 29% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $4,858,338 over 8y, 60% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $247,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMETRO COMMUNITY PROVIDER NETWORK INC — $235,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBENEFITS IN ACTION — $184,102 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $150,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $111,917 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetVia Mobility Services — $95,692 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJEFFERSON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH — $84,388 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES — $80,917 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetJEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER — $68,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOLLEGE TRACK — $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF BOULDER COUNTY INC — $41,225 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG AMERICANS CENTER FOR FINANCIAL EDUCATION — $40,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES OF BROOMFIELD — $38,300 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetJEFFERSON COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetSENIORS' RESOURCE CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetARVADA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $25,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $24,520 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOAL CREEK MEALS ON WHEELS — $24,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetMending Faces — $22,000 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC — $17,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT ST VINCENT HOME INC — $16,930 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOULDER PRIDE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBICYCLE COLORADO — $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWOW CHILDREN'S MUSEUM WORLD OF WONDER — $15,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCOLORADO RAILROAD HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetARAPAHOE HOUSE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetA PRECIOUS CHILD INC — $14,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUPLIFT INTERNATIONALE — $12,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY REACH CENTER INC — $11,917 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETRO CRISIS SERVICES INC — $11,917 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOMEWARD BOUND OF THE GRAND VALLEY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOULDER COUNTY RSVP BOARD INC dba CULTIVATE — $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJustin Parker Neurological Institute — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSUNSHINE HOME SHARE COLORADO — $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR HEALTH PROGRESS — $9,250 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOLORADO HEALTH INSTITUTE — $7,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRise Against Suicide — $6,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOLORADO PERSONALIZED EDUCATION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS FIRST INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAINT MARY INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $5,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWish for Wheels Inc — $5,008 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO55.4× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Community Foundation Boulder County · Nextfifty Initiative · Daniels Fund · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Colorado Trust · Anschutz Family Foundation · Broomfield Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Intermountain Front Range Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Catholic Charities of Central Florida Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph