Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Interact for Change

INTERACT FOR CHANGE's mission is to inspire, lead and support active giving and innovative philanthropic solutions.

$115k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Philanthropy$2.1MHealth$1.4MHuman Services$304kEducation$262kCommunity Improvement$248kCrime & Legal$200kArts & Culture$102kYouth Development$55kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $90,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $115,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $25,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$30,000
KENTUCKY AFRICAN WOMEN ASSOCIATION$15,000
NEPALI LANGUAGE AND ARTS CENTER$15,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER - PERINATAL INSTITUTE$15,000
REFUGE COLLABORATIVE$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $347k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ONE COMMUNITY ONE FAMILY: $8k → 12%SMART RECOVERY USA INC: $40k → 9%BREWHAUS BAKERY: $6k → 9%TOGETHER WE BAKE: $11k → 9%TALBERT HOUSE: $33k → 16%TALBERT HOUSE: $30k → 16%STRATEGIES TO END HOMELESSNESS: $15k → 16%FIRST STEP HOME: $7k → 16%REFUGEECONNECT: $25k → 16%CHANGING GEARS: $20k → 16%BEECH ACRES PARENTING CENTER: $25k → 16%GIRLS HEALTH PERIOD: $25k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES SOUTHWESTERN OHIO: $25k → 16%GIRLS HEALTH PERIOD: $10k → 16%INSPIRING SERVICE: $43k → 16%TRANSFORMATIONAL ADVANCEMENT OF BLACK LEADERSHIP & EXCELLENC: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
CA
KY
VA
AZ
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 18 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
52

Total granted

$1.5M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+28%

Still filing today

72%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    Hacking Heroin Collaborative
    2× · 2020–2021 · $175k · revenue +33% · 75% of their budget
  • AM
    ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2021 · $90k · revenue +97%
  • MC
    Mortar Cincinnati
    4× · 2019–2023 · $85k · revenue +153%

Funded once

  • OJ
    OHIO JUSTICE AND POLICY CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +110%
  • NK
    NORTHERN KENTUCKY AREA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $68k · revenue +139%
  • AC
    ALCOHOLISM COUNCIL OF BUTLER COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $58k · revenue +95%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Cincinnati Youth Collaborative

Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ("CYC") empowers young people to overcome barriers and excel in education, career, and life.

Education
3
Cintrifuse

To empower Cincinnati entrepreneurs to launch bold, scalable startups; and we work to improve the odds of those startups growing into transformational companies.

Community Improvement
4
Lead Ohio

At lead ohio our goal is to make a difference in communities across ohio by recruiting, training, supporting and empowering progressive leaders in all regions of the state.

Education
5
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

—
6
Child & Adolescent Behavioral Health

We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…

—
7
World Affairs Council - Cincinnati & Northern Kentucky

The World Affairs Council, a 501(c)3 nonprofit, is the bridge that connects the world to one of America's most vibrant regions. Through Global education, International exchange, and cultural awareness initiatives, the council strengthens…

—
8
PreventionFIRST

Mission: PreventionFIRST! implements best practice strategies to reduce the risk of behavioral health disorders. Vision: All communities apply prevention strategies in every stage of life.

Health
9
Digitalc

Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.

Community Improvement
10
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights
11
Citylink Center

To show god's love to those in need by providing an integrated path to holistic life change.

Community Improvement
12
Cincinnati Works

Cincinnati works brings hope and encouragement to people living in poverty while assisting them in advancing to self-sufficiency through employment. we provide free training and coaching services.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hacking Heroin Collaborative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%15%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%51%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%16%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%3/77
the rest of the field
13%
240,393/1,819,488

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/65
Grantees still filing
48/65
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $1,979,416 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC — $98,880 · Philanthropy+3 more — $55,500 · PhilanthropyREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT SAN DIEGO — $259,692 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF…CLERMONT COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH — $233,066 · OtherCLERMONT COUNTY MENTAL HEALT…WARREN COUNTY TREASURER — $115,200 · OtherWARREN COUNTY TREASURERUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI — $44,500 · OtherMortar Cincinnati — $85,000 · OtherMortar Cincinnati+26 more — $512,098 · Other+26 moreHacking Heroin Collaborative — $175,000 · HealthHacking Heroin Co…GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION OF CINCINNATI INC — $144,740 · HealthGOOD SAMARITAN HO…ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $90,000 · HealthATRIUM MEDICAL CE…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $82,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPIT…ALCOHOLISM COUNCIL OF BUTLER COUNTY — $58,000 · HealthALCOHOLISM COUNCI…COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $52,460 · HealthCOMMUNITY MENTAL …THE CROSSROADS CENTER — $50,000 · HealthTHE CROSSROADS CE…VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE-BERKSHIRES INC — $32,000 · Health+4 more — $75,000 · Health+4 moreTALBERT HOUSE — $63,000 · Human ServicesINSPIRING SERVICE — $42,954 · Human ServicesSMART RECOVERY USA INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesCHANGINGGEARS INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS HEALTH PERIOD — $35,000 · Human ServicesTRANSFORMATIONAL ADVANCEMENT OF BLACK LEADERSHIP AND EXCELLENCE — $25,000 · Human ServicesRefugeeConnect — $25,000 · Human ServicesBEECH ACRES — $25,000 · Human ServicesCatholic Charities Southwestern Ohio — $25,000 · Human ServicesStrategies to End Homelessness Inc — $15,000 · Human Services+4 more — $31,350 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER INSTITUTE — $32,234 · EducationWordplay Cincy — $25,000 · EducationSchool Board School — $25,000 · EducationBARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC — $23,100 · EducationXAVIER UNIVERSITY — $22,500 · EducationPARTNERSHIP FOR INNOVATION IN EDUCATION — $15,000 · EducationBARD COLLEGE — $15,000 · EducationLET'S GET READY INC — $10,750 · Education+3 more — $16,350 · EducationOHIO JUSTICE AND POLICY CENTER — $100,000 · Civil RightsNORTHERN KENTUCKY AREA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT — $67,500 · Community ImprovementCorporation for Findlay Market — $30,000 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$2,133,796Other$1,249,556Health$759,200Human Services$367,304Education$184,934Civil Rights$100,000Community Improvement$97,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $1,979,416 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHacking Heroin Collaborative — $175,000 over 2y, 75% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION OF CINCINNATI INC — $144,740 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetOHIO JUSTICE AND POLICY CENTER — $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC — $98,880 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $90,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetMortar Cincinnati — $85,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $82,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN KENTUCKY AREA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT — $67,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTALBERT HOUSE — $63,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALCOHOLISM COUNCIL OF BUTLER COUNTY — $58,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $52,460 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CROSSROADS CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetINSPIRING SERVICE — $42,954 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetWOMEN HELPING WOMEN — $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetURBAN JUSTICE CENTER — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMART RECOVERY USA INC — $40,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCHANGINGGEARS INC — $40,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetGIRLS HEALTH PERIOD — $35,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER INSTITUTE — $32,234 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE-BERKSHIRES INC — $32,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCorporation for Findlay Market — $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetA PICTURES WORTH INC — $25,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetWordplay Cincy — $25,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetLEARNING GROVE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBrighton Center Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRANSFORMATIONAL ADVANCEMENT OF BLACK LEADERSHIP AND EXCELLENCE — $25,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetRefugeeConnect — $25,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budget1N5 — $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetHEALTH CARE ACCESS NOW — $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNORTHERN KENTUCKY CHILDRENS LAW CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetGREEN UMBRELLA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSchool Board School — $25,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetBEECH ACRES — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Charities Southwestern Ohio — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFound Village — $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Association of Greater Cincinnati — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH AT THE CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetBARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC — $23,100 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY — $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLA COCINA VA — $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBRAWS BRINGING RESOURCES TO AID WOMEN'S SHELTERS — $15,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetStrategies to End Homelessness Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetORANGE RIBBONS FOR JAIME INC — $15,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR INNOVATION IN EDUCATION — $15,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetBARD COLLEGE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLET'S GET READY INC — $10,750 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Interact for HealthThe Greater Cincinnat…United Way of Greater…Millstone FundCarol Ann and Ralph V…Johnson Charitable Gi…John a Schroth Family…Jack J Smith Jr Chari…Pfau Charitable Found…Andrew Jergens Founda…The Thomas J Emery Me…The Peter and Mary Le…
Interact for HealthOH64.9× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Interact for Health · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · Millstone Fund · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Jack J Smith Jr Charitable Trust · Pfau Charitable Foundation · Andrew Jergens Foundation · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · The Peter and Mary Levin Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Interact for Change funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Volunteers in Medicine-Berkshires Inc — 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home