· Private foundation
The Peter and Mary Levin Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k38 grants · $102k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $379k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $138k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OHIO JUSTICE AND POLICY CENTER | $88,000 |
| NEW ISRAEL FUND | $50,000 |
| VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE BERKSHIRES | $40,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST OHI | $30,000 |
| IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE LAW CENTER | $28,250 |
| J STREET EDUCATION FUND | $25,000 |
| CINCINNATI ARTS FOUNDATION | $23,000 |
| PREGNANCY JUSTICE | $22,250 |
| WILD PLUM CENTER FOR YOUTH CHILDREN | $22,250 |
| HER CINCINNATI | $22,250 |
| MAYDAY MEDICINES INC | $22,250 |
| FIRST STEP HOME | $22,250 |
| JUSTICE AND MERCY LEGAL AID CENTER | $22,250 |
| VILLAGE EXCHANGE CENTER | $22,250 |
| GRAD CINCINNATI | $15,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $202k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
51 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $163k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OJOHIO JUSTICE AND POLICY CENTER5× · 2020–2025 · $195k · revenue +24%
- VIVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE-BERKSHIRES INC5× · 2020–2025 · $185k · revenue +143%
- GCGRAD CINCINNATI INC4× · 2020–2025 · $96k · revenue +62%
Funded once
- IHI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $40k
- SUSTATES UNITED DEMOCRACY CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +90%
- RCREPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOMone grant, 2020 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
To resolve serious legal problems of low income people, to promote economic and family stability, and reduce poverty through effective legal assistance.
To empower Cincinnati entrepreneurs to launch bold, scalable startups; and we work to improve the odds of those startups growing into transformational companies.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The center for international policy is a woman-led, progressive, independent nonprofit center for research, education, and advocacy working to advance a more peaceful, just, and sustainable u.s. approach to foreign policy. through…
Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra (CCO) creates intimate, transformative experiences that connect the musically curious.
The ohio state bar association (the "association") is an unincorporated voluntary non-profit organization. the association was formed to promote justice and advance the interests of the legal profession.
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.
United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Shares of Greater Cincinnati and the most unlike its peers is Rise Up News. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
90 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 90 of the 124 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INTERACT FOR CHANGE ↗
- Who funds OHIO JUSTICE AND POLICY CENTER ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE-BERKSHIRES INC ↗
- Who funds Jewish Federation of Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds GRAD CINCINNATI INC ↗
- Who funds ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
- Who funds BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds LET'S GET READY INC ↗
- Who funds Immigrant & Refugee Law Center ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds Williams College ↗
- Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Institute of Fine Arts ↗
- Who funds Strategies to End Homelessness Inc ↗
- Who funds Center for Common Ground ↗
- Who funds J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds STATES UNITED DEMOCRACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Fair Elections Center ↗
- Who funds COSMIC WRITERS CORP ↗
- Who funds VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ENSEMBLE THEATRE OF CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds AVENUES FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds Teambrownsville Inc ↗
- Who funds Equality Ohio Education Fund ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Parks Foundation ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MAYDAY MEDICINES INC ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE EXCHANGE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE AND MERCY LEGAL AID CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE FIRST STEP HOME INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Millstone Fund · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Interact for Change · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Ruth J & Robert a Conway Foundation Inc · Marge & Charles J Schott Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Peter and Mary Levin Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Volunteers in Medicine-Berkshires Inc — 10% of income from government
- Construct Inc — 4% of income from government
- Community Access to the Arts Inc — 2% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Edith Wharton Restoration Inc — 1% of income from government
- New England Public Media Inc — 0% of income from government
- Berkshire Garden Center Inc Dba Berkshire Botanical Garden Inc — 0% of income from government
- Williams College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.