· Private foundation
Pfau Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k41 grants · $1.0M
- $50k–250k9 grants · $515k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREATER CINCINNATI FDN | $100,000 |
| CRAYONS TO COMPUTERS INC | $60,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF | $55,000 |
| BETHANY HOUSE SERVICES INC | $50,000 |
| CINCINNATI INST OF FINE ARTS | $50,000 |
| STARFIRE COUNCIL OF GREATER CINCINNATI I | $50,000 |
| COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY CHILD CARE | $50,000 |
| CINCINNATI YOUTH COLLABORATIVE | $50,000 |
| MINDPEACE | $50,000 |
| CINCINNATI EYE INSTITUTE | $40,000 |
| STEPPING STONES INC | $40,000 |
| LEARNING GROVE INC | $40,000 |
| CLOVERNOOK CENTER FOR THE BLIND AND VISU | $40,000 |
| 1N5 | $40,000 |
| FREESTORE FOODBANK | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
115 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 83 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $435k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CICincinnati Institute of Fine Arts9× · 2017–2025 · $450k · revenue +2%
- MCMindPeace Cincinnati5× · 2018–2025 · $300k · revenue +193%
- LYLIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES7× · 2017–2024 · $280k · revenue +49%
Funded once
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2017 · $100k
- LALiving Arrangements for the Developmentally Disabled Incgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $75k · revenue +46%
- CRCOVID-19 REGIONALone grant, 2020 · $75k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Residential & Habilitative Svs. Provide residential and habilitative services to adults with developmental disabilities
The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
United Way improves lives by uniting the caring power of our community.
Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.
To offer children and young adults a top quality program that develops, trains and competes as competitive swimmers year-round in a supportive and motivating enviroment that respects, challenges and nurtures them as athletes, students, and…
To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.
We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…
To provide pathways for growth, achievement, and lifelong success.
Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.
The World Affairs Council, a 501(c)3 nonprofit, is the bridge that connects the world to one of America's most vibrant regions. Through Global education, International exchange, and cultural awareness initiatives, the council strengthens…
Advocates for Kids is committed to providing service and/or supporting organizations that serve children by providing experiences that empower them to realize their full potential. Advocates for Kids envisions children achieving a clearer…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Citylink Center and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
147 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 147 of the 218 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Cincinnati Institute of Fine Arts ↗
- Who funds MindPeace Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI WORKS ↗
- Who funds LEARNING GROVE INC ↗
- Who funds THE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OHIO VALLEY VOICES ↗
- Who funds Redwood School & Rehabilitation Inc ↗
- Who funds ProKids ↗
- Who funds SANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY CHILD CARE ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds DIOCESAN CATHOLIC CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds SPRINGER SCHOOL AND CENTER ↗
- Who funds CRAYONS AND BEYOND INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN KENTUCKY CHILDRENS LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Legal Aid Society of Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds Visionaries and Voices ↗
- Who funds YWCA of Greater Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds PER SCHOLAS INC ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Playhouse in the Park ↗
- Who funds STEPPING STONES INC ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
- Who funds WELCOME HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Bethany House Services Inc ↗
- Who funds OHIO JUSTICE AND POLICY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Breakthrough Cincinnati Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICE OF THE OHIO HUMANE SOCIETY DBA FAMILIESFORWARD ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Association for the Blind and Visually Impaired ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE WORKING COOPERATIVELY INC ↗
- Who funds Joy Outdoor Education Center Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds BEECH ACRES ↗
- Who funds Brighton Center Inc ↗
- Who funds The Children's Home of Cincinnati Ohio ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Andrew Jergens Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Jack J Smith Jr Charitable Trust · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Millstone Fund · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Sutphin Family Foundation Ica · Josephine S Russell Charitable
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pfau Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hibiscus Children's Center Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Pfau Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Pfau Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.