· Private foundation
Jack J Smith Jr Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $95k
- $10k–50k23 grants · $349k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PROKIDS | $30,000 |
| LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI | $30,000 |
| CHILDREN INCORPORATED | $20,000 |
| DCCH CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES | $20,000 |
| CENTRAL CLINIC | $20,000 |
| WOMEN HELPING WOMEN | $20,000 |
| LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES INC | $20,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $15,000 |
| STEPPING STONES INC | $15,000 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF CINCINNATI | $15,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| CINCINNATI UNION BETHEL | $15,000 |
| BEECH ACRES PARENTING CENTER | $12,000 |
| NATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES | $12,000 |
| INTERPARISH MINISTRY FOOD PANTRY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $780k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
105 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 74 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PProKids5× · 2017–2025 · $130k · revenue +210%
- BHBethany House Services Inc4× · 2018–2024 · $80k · revenue +158%
- LALegal Aid Society of Cincinnati3× · 2021–2025 · $80k · revenue +45%
Funded once
- HSHEARING SPEECH AND DEAF CENTER OF GREAone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +1%
- SOSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL PARTICULARone grant, 2021 · $20k
- LLLife Learning Center Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +941%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We support individuals with autism and their families through programming in the areas of academics, adaptive behavior, communication, and social participation.
Residential & Habilitative Svs. Provide residential and habilitative services to adults with developmental disabilities
The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.
Unlocking the self-worth and potential of at-risk teens through the transformative power of art, a first-class environment and a character-building culture. Equipping at-risk teens with skills, credentials and pathways to employment.…
Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra (CCO) creates intimate, transformative experiences that connect the musically curious.
To offer children and young adults a top quality program that develops, trains and competes as competitive swimmers year-round in a supportive and motivating enviroment that respects, challenges and nurtures them as athletes, students, and…
To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.
To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.
The mission of The Children's Theatre of Cincinnati (TCT) is to educate, entertain and engage audiences of all ages through professional theatrical productions and arts education programming. Our vision is to awaken a lifelong love of…
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…
The World Affairs Council, a 501(c)3 nonprofit, is the bridge that connects the world to one of America's most vibrant regions. Through Global education, International exchange, and cultural awareness initiatives, the council strengthens…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Citylink Center and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
121 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 121 of the 170 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ProKids ↗
- Who funds STEPPING STONES INC ↗
- Who funds Bethany House Services Inc ↗
- Who funds Legal Aid Society of Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds Joy Outdoor Education Center Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds LEARNING GROVE INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Redwood School & Rehabilitation Inc ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND HORSEM HORSEMANSHIP ↗
- Who funds BEECH ACRES ↗
- Who funds UPSPRING ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Union Bethel ↗
- Who funds Brighton Center Inc ↗
- Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN KENTUCKY CHILDRENS LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WELCOME HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Elementz ↗
- Who funds Breakthrough Cincinnati Inc ↗
- Who funds ENVISION CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds MAY WE HELP INC ↗
- Who funds FOCUS ON YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Clovernook Center For the Blind and Visually Impaired ↗
- Who funds St Rita School For The Deaf ↗
- Who funds Family Nurturing Center of Kentucky ↗
- Who funds DIOCESAN CATHOLIC CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds Glad House Inc ↗
- Who funds CITYLINK CENTER ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN OF GREATER CINCINN ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ↗
- Who funds THE FIRST STEP HOME INC ↗
- Who funds Emanuel Community Center DBA Cincinnati Squash Academy ↗
- Who funds OHIO VALLEY VOICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Andrew Jergens Foundation · Pfau Charitable Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Millstone Fund · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Sutphin Family Foundation Ica · Josephine S Russell Charitable · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · United Way of Greater Cincinnati
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jack J Smith Jr Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.