Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Idex Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.4M
Granted FY2022
81
Grants FY2022
22
States reached
$291k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

92% of Idex Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to American Online Giving Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Idex Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 63 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

35
’20
51
’21
63
’22
43
’23
11
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Philanthropy$3.3MInternational$1.6MYouth Development$953kHuman Services$786kFood & Nutrition$461kHousing & Shelter$324kEducation$309kCommunity Improvement$150kOther$0
02FY2022 · 81 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k49 grants · $273k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $515k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $305k
  • $250k+1 grant · $291k
$7,500
Median grant
22
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Charities Aid Foundation America$291,075
Boys and Girls Club$100,000
Boys and Girls Club Charlotte Count$55,000
Cuidando Los Ninos$50,000
American Red Cross$50,000
Mile High United Way$50,000
Boulder County Crisis Fund$40,000
Boys and Girls Clubs of Rochester$30,000
Purdue Research Foundation$30,000
Purdue University$30,000
Autism Up$29,900
Jewish Family Services$29,000
Instituto Del Progresso Latino$25,000
I Empathize$25,000
Redwood Empire Food Bank$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $533k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Pine Street Inn: $25k → 16%Shelterbox USA: $50k → 14%Community Express Inc: $5k → 16%American Red Cross: $50k → 14%Metropolitan Minitries: $10k → 13%Interfaith Emergency Services: $5k → 16%Kadens Kloset: $5k → 10%A Precious Child: $20k → 5%Hmong American Association of Colorado: $10k → 10%Bridge House: $57k → 12%Summit Assistance Dogs: $13k → 11%Pine Street Inn Incorporated: $15k → 16%American Red Cross: $50k → 14%Interfaith Emergency Services Inc: $5k → 16%A Precious Child: $8k → 5%Bridge House: $12k → 12%Summit Asistance Dogs: $8k → 11%Pine Street Inn: $10k → 16%A Precious Child: $5k → 5%Emergency Family Assistance: $10k → 12%Summit Assistance Dogs: $8k → 11%Eli Home: $1k → 10%Next Step Farms: $14k → 11%Council on Aging of Cleveland: $5k → 17%PABNEEG: $8k → 5%Cuidando Los Ninos: $35k → 14%Mosaic CCDA: $5k → 15%Emergency Family Assistance: $10k → 12%Wish for Wheels: $5k → 12%YMCA of North Central Ohio: $21k → 15%Council on Aging Cleveland County: $5k → 17%Emergency Family Assistance Association Inc: $5k → 12%Cradles to Crayons: $10k → 14%Instituto Del Progresso Latino: $25k → 14%The Willow Domestic Violence Center: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
VA
DE
AZ
NM
KS
NC
DC
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 57 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

57 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2022, 12 since wound down; 70 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
42

Total granted

$2.0M
$517k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+30%

Still filing today

82%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHealthEducationAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +23%
  • KA
    Kids Above All Illinois
    2× · 2020–2021 · $90k · revenue +68%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ROCHESTER INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $88k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club America
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club Central Florida
    one grant, 2021 · $34k
  • DC
    Dr Cornell A Bell BOP
    one grant, 2021 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
4
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
5
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
6
Regional Food Bank of Northeastern New York Inc

To lead a network of partners to alleviate hunger, prevent food waste, and nourish the communities we serve. our vision is that all people have the nutritious food they need to thrive.

Food & Nutrition
7
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
8
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
9
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank

The organization's mission is to mobilize resources to fight hunger in our community. to fulfill its mission, the food bank:* sources and acquires nutritious food and other products and distribute them to people experiencing nutrition…

—
10
America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc

To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.

Food & Nutrition
11
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
12
Community Food Bank of New Jersey Inc

We serve as a champion for addressing the root causes of hunger, delivering neighbor-centric solutions, and fostering collaborative partnerships across all sectors of society for New Jersey.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families Forward and the most unlike its peers is Pabneeg. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Pregnancy Support ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesSenior Support ServicesCancer Support ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportAddiction Recovery ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Developmental Disabilities …Youth Sports ProgramsYouth Development ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Community College Foundatio…Animal Rescue and ShelterCommunity FoundationsUnited Way AffiliatesCommunity Food PantriesYouth Development CentersFood Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%34%35–55yr16%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%50%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%11%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/112
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,453

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

109 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 109 of the 171 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
108/109
Grantees still filing
76/109
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC — $3,174,981 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INCCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $1,521,709 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA+4 more — $150,000 · PhilanthropyThe UK Online Giving Foundation — $150,304 · OtherThe UK Online Giving Founda…Boys and Girls Club — $100,000 · OtherBoys and Girls Club America — $100,000 · OtherBoys and Girls Club Charlotte Count — $100,000 · OtherKids Above All Illinois — $90,000 · OtherBoys and Girls Club Benton Harbor — $80,000 · Other+104 more — $1,370,399 · Other+104 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $100,000 · Human ServicesCUIDANDO LOS NIOS INC — $85,000 · Human ServicesBridge House — $69,000 · Human ServicesPINE STREET INN INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesSHELTERBOX USA INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesA PRECIOUS CHILD INC — $32,500 · Human ServicesSUMMIT ASSISTANCE DOGS — $27,500 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE FOR LATINO PROGRESS — $25,000 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION — $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO INC — $21,000 · Human Services+13 more — $97,500 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ROCHESTER INC — $87,798 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CARLSBAD — $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNION LEAGUE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CHARLOTTE COUNTY — $15,000 · Youth Development+5 more — $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentFeeding Kids Cleveland County Inc — $60,000 · Food & NutritionREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $49,000 · Food & NutritionREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC — $30,000 · Food & NutritionFOODLINK INC — $30,000 · Food & NutritionNORTHEAST IOWA FOOD BANK — $25,000 · Food & NutritionROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC — $25,000 · Food & NutritionNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK — $15,000 · Food & NutritionJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK — $15,000 · Food & NutritionBRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $10,000 · Food & Nutrition+4 more — $20,000 · Food & NutritionNORTH END COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COLLABORATIVE INC — $87,800 · Community ImprovementSOUTH SHORE COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC — $32,500 · Community ImprovementWHEELING TOWNSHIP EMERGENCY FUND INC — $20,000 · Community ImprovementKIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION — $43,625 · EducationPurdue Research Foundation — $30,000 · EducationHEAR SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $15,000 · EducationCristo Rey St Martin College Prep — $9,500 · Education
Philanthropy$4,846,690Other$1,990,703Human Services$582,500Youth Development$302,798Food & Nutrition$289,000Community Improvement$140,300Education$118,125

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC — $3,174,981 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $1,521,709 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC — $130,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKids Above All Illinois — $90,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH END COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COLLABORATIVE INC — $87,800 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ROCHESTER INC — $87,798 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetCUIDANDO LOS NIOS INC — $85,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetBridge House — $69,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetFeeding Kids Cleveland County Inc — $60,000 over 3y, 41% of budgetiEmpathize — $50,000 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC — $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $49,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION — $43,625 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN VILLAGE PRESERVATION CORPORATION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetRochester Childfirst Network — $36,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CARLSBAD — $35,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTH SHORE COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC — $32,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetA PRECIOUS CHILD INC — $32,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC — $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOODLINK INC — $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDLY HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF MANSFIELD OHIO — $30,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC — $30,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetPurdue Research Foundation — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK — $29,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISMUP INC — $29,900 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSUMMIT ASSISTANCE DOGS — $27,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR LATINO PROGRESS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNION LEAGUE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS — $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION — $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEAST IOWA FOOD BANK — $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC — $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA HEARTLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO INC — $21,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Whidbey Help House — $20,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetWHEELING TOWNSHIP EMERGENCY FUND INC — $20,000 over 4y, 8.7% of budgetHEAR SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNOURISHING HOPE — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES FORWARD — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CHARLOTTE COUNTY — $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rochester Area Commun…Greater Rochester Hea…Boys & Girls Clubs of…Esl Charitable Founda…Max and Marian Farash…United Way of Greater…Boys & Girls Clubs of…Ames-Amzalak Memorial…Daisy Marquis Jones F…Rochester Female Char…Summers Foundation IncWaldron Rise Foundati…
Rochester Area Community FoundationNY22.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rochester Area Community Foundation · Greater Rochester Health Foundation · Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Esl Charitable Foundation · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · Ames-Amzalak Memorial Trust · Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation · Rochester Female Charitable Society · Summers Foundation Inc · Waldron Rise Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Idex Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Boys' & Girls' Club of New Britain Inc — 58% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Connecticut Inc — 42% of income from government
  • Friends of Jack Foundation Inc — 36% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
  • South Shore Community Action Council Inc — 20% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
  • United Way of Marion County Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
41report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Idex Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Idex Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 171 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines