Skip to content
Hollywood Charity Horse Show at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Hollywood Charity Horse Show

The mission of the HOLLYWOOD CHARITY HORSE SHOW organization is: to support local and national children's and veteran's charities.

$412k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.2MYouth Development$979kHuman Services$357kArts & Culture$196kEducation$74kAnimals$65kRecreation & Sports$41kPhilanthropy$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k14 grants · $306k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$26k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLLENBECK POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE$100,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$40,000
ARTS UP$32,000
THE VILLAGE FAMILY SERVICES$30,000
DREAM CATCHER OF LOS ANGELES$25,000
SADDLES FOR SOLDIERS$20,000
FRIENDLY HOUSE$20,000
THE PAINTED TURTLE$20,000
A PLACE CALLED HOME$20,000
AHEAD WITH HORSES$20,000
CATERINA'S CLUB$20,000
BLIND CHILDREN'S CENTER$20,000
SHADOW HILLS RIDING CLUB$19,200
WRIGHT FOUNDATION$10,000
PETS FOR VETS INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $487k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CATARINA'S CLUB: $28k → 10%QUEEN OF HEARTS: $1k → 11%BRAVEHEARTS INC: $1k → 6%CATERINA'S CLUB: $25k → 10%CATERINA'S CLUB: $20k → 10%CATERINA'S CLUB: $13k → 10%CATARINA'S CLUB: $10k → 10%CATARINA'S CLUB: $5k → 10%CATERINA'S CLUB: $3k → 10%CATERINA'S CLUB: $3k → 10%FRIENDS & HELPERS FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%FRIENDS & HELPERS FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%FRIENDS & HELPERS FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%FRIENDS & HELPERS FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%SADDLES FOR SOLDIERS: $26k → 14%SADDLES FOR SOLDIERS: $20k → 14%SADDLES FOR SOLDIERS: $20k → 14%SADDLES FOR SOLDIERS: $10k → 14%SADDLES FOR SOLDIERS: $5k → 14%FRIENDS AND HELPERS FOUNDATION: $28k → 14%FRIENDS AND HELPERS FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%FRIENDS AND HELPERS FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%THE VILLAGE FAMILY SERVICES: $39k → 14%THE VILLAGE FAMILY SERVICES: $36k → 14%THE VILLAGE FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 14%THE VILLAGE FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 14%THE VILLAGE FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 14%the village family services: $21k → 14%THE VILLAGE FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 14%THE VILLAGE FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 19 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
12

Total granted

$3.3M
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+49%

Still filing today

89%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    9× · 2017–2025 · $251k · revenue +78%
  • TV
    The Village Family Services Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $216k · revenue +47%
  • AP
    A PLACE CALLED HOME
    8× · 2017–2025 · $187k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ALL GLORY PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $24k · revenue ×108
  • GM
    Gay Mens Chorus of Los Angeles
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +18%
  • SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +49%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Veteran Equine Therapy Stables
Public Benefit
2
Therapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc

Empowering individuals with diverse abilities to reach their full potential through equine-assisted services since 1974.

Recreation & Sports
3
Ride On La Ride On Therapeutic Horsemanship

Ride On LA was organized to primarily promote the welfare of at-risk youth and people with any type of physical, mental or cognitive disability by means of equine assisted activities and therapies, and by providing instruction and…

Human Services
4
Friends of Leaps & Bounds Pediatric Therapy Inc

To assist economically disadvantaged people with disabilities through providing physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy and hippotherapy treatments at no cost or low cost

Health
5
Wings of Hope Therapeutic Riding Program Inc
—
6
Great Results Equine Assisted Therapies
Health
7
Special Equestrians Inc

To provide therapeautic benefits to handicapped citizens through a horseback riding program.

Health
8
Heroes Equine Assisted Riding Therapy
—
9
Shangri-La Therapeutic Academy of Riding Inc

To foster personal achievement by providing therapeutic experiences using horse-related activities for persons with disabilities or other special challenges.

Health
10
Jf Shea Therapeutic Riding Center Inc Fka Fran Joswick Therap Riding Ctr Inc

The shea center empowers people with disabilities through equine assisted services and therapies.

Recreation & Sports
11
Sandbar Sanctuary

Sandbar sanctuary provides equine therapy for victims of domestic violence, using horses who have themselves been rescued from abusive or neglectful situations. our goal is to help our clients increase their confidence and learn to set…

Health
12
Horses for Healing Inc

The mission of Horses for Healing Inc is the provision of client-centered, trauma-informed, and evidence-based clinical equine psychotherapy and comlementary services that support healing from pervasive trauma.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gay Mens Chorus of Los Angeles; the most unlike its peers is Wright Foundation for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/31
Grantees still filing
19/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AHEAD WITH HORSES INC: $410,220 · HealthAHEAD WITH HORSES INCChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $251,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los AngelesDreamcatcher of Los Angeles Therapeutic Riding Centers: $236,715 · HealthDreamcatcher of Los Angeles Therapeutic Ri…Friendly Hand Foundation DBA Friendly House: $155,984 · HealthFriendly Hand Foundation DBA Friendly Hous…SHADOW HILLS RIDING CLUB INC: $119,180 · HealthSHADOW HILLS RIDING CLUB INCWRIGHT FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY AND STRABISMUS: $79,500 · HealthWRIGHT FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOL…+1 more: $10,000 · HealthHOLLENBECK POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE: $810,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOLLENBECK POLICE ACTIVITIES LE…THE PAINTED TURTLE: $121,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PAINTED TURTLEThe Village Family Services Inc: $216,000 · Human ServicesThe Village Fami…CATERINAS CLUB: $105,000 · Human ServicesCATERINAS CLUBFRIENDS AND HELPERS FOUNDATION: $82,500 · Human ServicesFRIENDS AND HELP…SADDLES FOR SOLDIERS INC: $81,000 · Human ServicesSADDLES FOR SOLD…+2 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesARTSUP LA: $217,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $11,000 · Arts & CultureA PLACE CALLED HOME: $187,000 · OtherA PLACE C…Pets for Vets Inc: $74,500 · OtherPets for …THE ALL GLORY PROJECT: $24,000 · OtherTHE ALL G…+4 more: $8,000 · OtherThe Blind Childrens Center Inc: $94,000 · EducationELSA INC: $78,500 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $2,500 · Recreation & Sports
Health$1,262,599Youth Development$931,500Human Services$486,500Arts & Culture$228,000Other$293,500Education$94,000Recreation & Sports$81,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOLLENBECK POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE: $810,000 over 8y, 17% of budgetAHEAD WITH HORSES INC: $410,220 over 8y, 39% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $251,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDreamcatcher of Los Angeles Therapeutic Riding Centers: $236,715 over 8y, 34% of budgetARTSUP LA: $217,000 over 8y, 7.4% of budgetThe Village Family Services Inc: $216,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME: $187,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetFriendly Hand Foundation DBA Friendly House: $155,984 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetTHE PAINTED TURTLE: $121,500 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetSHADOW HILLS RIDING CLUB INC: $119,180 over 8y, 14% of budgetCATERINAS CLUB: $105,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetThe Blind Childrens Center Inc: $94,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS AND HELPERS FOUNDATION: $82,500 over 7y, 14% of budgetSADDLES FOR SOLDIERS INC: $81,000 over 5y, 33% of budgetWRIGHT FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY AND STRABISMUS: $79,500 over 8y, 51% of budgetELSA INC: $78,500 over 7y, 36% of budgetPets for Vets Inc: $74,500 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGay Mens Chorus of Los Angeles: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIAVOLO DANCE THEATRE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRiding Emphasizing Individual Needs & Strengths: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PASADENA PLAYHOUSE STATE THEATRE OF CALIFORNIA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLBURN SCHOOL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHORSES 4 HEROES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe American Legion: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetQUEEN OF HEARTS THERAPUTIC RIDING CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINNER CITY YOUTH ORCHRSTRA OF LOS ANGELES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons F…California Community …The Green FoundationWm Keck FoundationThe Ahmanson Foundati…The Annenberg Foundat…Perenchio FoundationThe Rose Hills Founda…Elbridge Stuart Found…Weingart FoundationSempra FoundationMorgan Stanley Global…
The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA23.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Green Foundation · Wm Keck Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Perenchio Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hollywood Charity Horse Show funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hollywood Charity Horse Show. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hollywood Charity Horse Show?

    Find your warmest path to Hollywood Charity Horse Show through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hollywood Charity Horse Show’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home