Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Hollywood Charity Horse Show

The foundation's exempt purpose is to present an annual horse show.

$448k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$1.2MYouth Development$979kHuman Services$357kArts & Culture$196kEducation$74kAnimals$65kRecreation & Sports$41kPhilanthropy$24kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k15 grants · $318k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$65k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLLENBECK POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE$80,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$50,000
SHADOW HILLS RIDING CLUB$36,480
THE VILLAGE FAMILY SERVICES$36,000
FRIENDLY HOUSE$30,000
CRE OUTREACH FOUNDATION INC$26,000
CATERINA'S CLUB$25,000
DREAM CATCHER OF LOS ANGELES$25,000
AHEAD WITH HORSES$25,000
SADDLES FOR SOLDIERS$20,000
FRIENDS & HELPERS FOUNDATION$20,000
A PLACE CALLED HOME$15,000
BLIND CHILDREN'S CENTER$15,000
WRIGHT FOUNDATION$15,000
THE PAINTED TURTLE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $417k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CATARINA'S CLUB: $28k → 10%QUEEN OF HEARTS: $1k → 11%BRAVEHEARTS INC: $1k → 6%CATERINA'S CLUB: $25k → 10%CATERINA'S CLUB: $13k → 10%CATARINA'S CLUB: $10k → 10%CATARINA'S CLUB: $5k → 10%CATERINA'S CLUB: $3k → 10%CATERINA'S CLUB: $3k → 10%FRIENDS & HELPERS FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%FRIENDS & HELPERS FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%FRIENDS & HELPERS FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%FRIENDS & HELPERS FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%SADDLES FOR SOLDIERS: $26k → 14%SADDLES FOR SOLDIERS: $20k → 14%SADDLES FOR SOLDIERS: $10k → 14%SADDLES FOR SOLDIERS: $5k → 14%FRIENDS AND HELPERS FOUNDATION: $28k → 14%FRIENDS AND HELPERS FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%FRIENDS AND HELPERS FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%THE VILLAGE FAMILY SERVICES: $39k → 14%THE VILLAGE FAMILY SERVICES: $36k → 14%THE VILLAGE FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 14%THE VILLAGE FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 14%the village family services: $21k → 14%THE VILLAGE FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 14%THE VILLAGE FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 19 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
12

Total granted

$2.9M
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+49%

Still filing today

89%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    8× · 2017–2024 · $211k · revenue +78%
  • TV
    The Village Family Services Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $186k · revenue +47%
  • AP
    A PLACE CALLED HOME
    7× · 2017–2024 · $167k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ALL GLORY PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $24k · revenue ×108
  • GM
    Gay Mens Chorus of Los Angeles
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +18%
  • RE
    Riding Emphasizing Individual Needs & Strengthsgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +49%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Veteran Equine Therapy Stables
Public Benefit
2
Friends of Leaps & Bounds Pediatric Therapy Inc

To assist economically disadvantaged people with disabilities through providing physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy and hippotherapy treatments at no cost or low cost

Health
3
Ride On La Ride On Therapeutic Horsemanship

Ride On LA was organized to primarily promote the welfare of at-risk youth and people with any type of physical, mental or cognitive disability by means of equine assisted activities and therapies, and by providing instruction and…

Human Services
4
Therapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc

Empowering individuals with diverse abilities to reach their full potential through equine-assisted services since 1974.

Recreation & Sports
5
Wings of Hope Therapeutic Riding Program Inc
—
6
Great Results Equine Assisted Therapies
Health
7
Special Equestrians Inc

To provide therapeautic benefits to handicapped citizens through a horseback riding program.

Health
8
Heroes Equine Assisted Riding Therapy
—
9
Shangri-La Therapeutic Academy of Riding Inc

To foster personal achievement by providing therapeutic experiences using horse-related activities for persons with disabilities or other special challenges.

Health
10
Jf Shea Therapeutic Riding Center Inc Fka Fran Joswick Therap Riding Ctr Inc

The shea center empowers people with disabilities through equine assisted services and therapies.

Recreation & Sports
11
Horses for Healing Inc

The mission of Horses for Healing Inc is the provision of client-centered, trauma-informed, and evidence-based clinical equine psychotherapy and comlementary services that support healing from pervasive trauma.

Health
12
Sandbar Sanctuary

Sandbar sanctuary provides equine therapy for victims of domestic violence, using horses who have themselves been rescued from abusive or neglectful situations. our goal is to help our clients increase their confidence and learn to set…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gay Mens Chorus of Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is Wright Foundation for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health Centers an…Child and Family Counseling…Early Childhood Care CentersJewish Community Organizati…Animal Rescue and WelfarePerforming Arts Organizatio…Art Museums and GalleriesAffordable Housing Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%3%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%24%10–20yr17%31%20–35yr11%21%35–55yr13%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr17%48%20–35yr11%15%35–55yr13%16%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
6%
2/31
the rest of the field
14%
26,001/186,947

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/31
Grantees still filing
19/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AHEAD WITH HORSES INC — $390,220 · HealthAHEAD WITH HORSES INCDreamcatcher of Los Angeles Therapeutic Riding Centers — $211,715 · HealthDreamcatcher of Los Angeles Therapeutic Rid…Children's Hospital Los Angeles — $211,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los AngelesFriendly Hand Foundation DBA Friendly House — $135,984 · HealthFriendly Hand Foundation DBA Friendly HouseSHADOW HILLS RIDING CLUB INC — $99,980 · HealthSHADOW HILLS RIDING CLUB INCWRIGHT FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY AND STRABISMUS — $69,500 · HealthWRIGHT FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLO…+1 more — $10,000 · HealthHOLLENBECK POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE — $710,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOLLENBECK POLICE ACTIVITIES L…THE PAINTED TURTLE — $101,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PAINTED TURTLEThe Village Family Services Inc — $186,000 · Human ServicesThe Village Fam…CATERINAS CLUB — $85,000 · Human ServicesCATERINAS CLUBFRIENDS AND HELPERS FOUNDATION — $82,500 · Human ServicesFRIENDS AND HEL…SADDLES FOR SOLDIERS INC — $61,000 · Human ServicesSADDLES FOR SOL…+2 more — $2,000 · Human ServicesARTSUP LA — $185,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more — $11,000 · Arts & CultureA PLACE CALLED HOME — $167,000 · OtherA PLACE CA…Pets for Vets Inc — $64,500 · OtherPets for V…THE ALL GLORY PROJECT — $24,000 · OtherTHE ALL GL…+4 more — $8,000 · OtherELSA INC — $78,500 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $2,500 · Recreation & SportsThe Blind Childrens Center Inc — $74,000 · Education
Health$1,128,399Youth Development$811,500Human Services$416,500Arts & Culture$196,000Other$263,500Recreation & Sports$81,000Education$74,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOLLENBECK POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE — $710,000 over 7y, 17% of budgetAHEAD WITH HORSES INC — $390,220 over 7y, 39% of budgetDreamcatcher of Los Angeles Therapeutic Riding Centers — $211,715 over 7y, 34% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $211,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Village Family Services Inc — $186,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetARTSUP LA — $185,000 over 7y, 7.4% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME — $167,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetFriendly Hand Foundation DBA Friendly House — $135,984 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetTHE PAINTED TURTLE — $101,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetSHADOW HILLS RIDING CLUB INC — $99,980 over 7y, 14% of budgetCATERINAS CLUB — $85,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS AND HELPERS FOUNDATION — $82,500 over 7y, 14% of budgetELSA INC — $78,500 over 7y, 36% of budgetThe Blind Childrens Center Inc — $74,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetWRIGHT FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY AND STRABISMUS — $69,500 over 7y, 40% of budgetPets for Vets Inc — $64,500 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetSADDLES FOR SOLDIERS INC — $61,000 over 4y, 33% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGay Mens Chorus of Los Angeles — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRiding Emphasizing Individual Needs & Strengths — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDIAVOLO DANCE THEATRE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COLBURN SCHOOL — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PASADENA PLAYHOUSE STATE THEATRE OF CALIFORNIA INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHORSES 4 HEROES — $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe American Legion — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetQUEEN OF HEARTS THERAPUTIC RIDING CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetINNER CITY YOUTH ORCHRSTRA OF LOS ANGELES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons F…California Community …The Green FoundationWm Keck FoundationThe Ahmanson Foundati…The Annenberg Foundat…Perenchio FoundationThe Rose Hills Founda…Elbridge Stuart Found…Weingart FoundationSempra FoundationMorgan Stanley Global…
The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA23.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Green Foundation · Wm Keck Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Perenchio Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hollywood Charity Horse Show funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hollywood Charity Horse Show?

    Find your warmest path to Hollywood Charity Horse Show through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines