· Private foundation
L & L Nippert Charitable Foundation Inc Attn Carter F Randolph Phd
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k35 grants · $1.0M
- $50k–250k43 grants · $3.7M
- $250k+2 grants · $550k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION | $300,000 |
| LA SOUPE INC | $250,000 |
| ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI | $200,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL COMMUNITY PHARMACY OF CINCINNATI | $150,000 |
| CRAYONS TO COMPUTERS | $150,000 |
| SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CINCINNATI | $150,000 |
| GREATER CINCINNATI TELEVISION EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | $130,000 |
| CATHOLIC INNERCITY SCHOOLS EDUCATION FUND (CISE) | $130,000 |
| CINCINNATI WORKS INC | $130,000 |
| TALBERT HOUSE | $125,000 |
| THE CINCINNATI EYE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION | $125,000 |
| 4C FOR CHILDREN | $100,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $100,000 |
| BETHANY HOUSE SERVICES INC | $100,000 |
| CAMP JOY FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $6.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
107 repeat relationships — 73 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $170k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LSLA SOUPE INC8× · 2017–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +790%
- ZSZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI6× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +41%
- CWCINCINNATI WORKS8× · 2017–2025 · $965k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- CECINCINNATI EARLY LEARNING CENTERS INCone grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue -4%
- SCST CLEMENT SCHOOLone grant, 2017 · $137k
- COCHURCH OF OUR SAVIOUR LA INGLESIA DE NUESTRO SALVADORone grant, 2018 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
Strategies to End Homelessness leads a coordinated community effort to end homelessness in Greater Cincinnati.
To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.
Residential & Habilitative Svs. Provide residential and habilitative services to adults with developmental disabilities
Empowering women to break the cycles of poverty, addiction, and human trafficking.
Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.
United Way improves lives by uniting the caring power of our community.
Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…
To develop and promote economic development, talent initiatives and the unique offerings in the cincinnati region.
The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.
To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.
Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio serves and empowers people through God's love in their times of vulnerability. We do so through a full range of local services that engage the community in building solidarity.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coverd Greater Cincinnati and the most unlike its peers is Holistic Manangement International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
129 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 129 of the 168 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LA SOUPE INC ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER ↗
- Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI WORKS ↗
- Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds The Greater Cincinnati Television Educational Foundation ↗
- Who funds TALBERT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Association for the Blind and Visually Impaired ↗
- Who funds The Cincinnati Eye Institute Foundation ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BEECH ACRES ↗
- Who funds Bethany House Services Inc ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Playhouse in the Park ↗
- Who funds Joy Outdoor Education Center Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds YWCA of Greater Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR RESPITE CARE INC ↗
- Who funds Matthew 25 Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND HORSEM HORSEMANSHIP ↗
- Who funds TAFT MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds Wave Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOMEN HELPING WOMEN ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF BUTLER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ProKids ↗
- Who funds CRAYONS AND BEYOND INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds MILL CREEK ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL COMMUNITY PHARMACY OF CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds CHILDHOOD FOOD SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Andrew Jergens Foundation · Millstone Fund · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Sutphin Family Foundation Ica · Pfau Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization L & L Nippert Charitable Foundation Inc Attn Carter F Randolph Phd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to L & L Nippert Charitable Foundation Inc Attn Carter F Randolph Phd?
Find your warmest path to L & L Nippert Charitable Foundation Inc Attn Carter F Randolph Phd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.