Skip to content
Haugh Family Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Haugh Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$259k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$447kReligion$325kHuman Services$165kEducation$153kRecreation & Sports$90kAnimals$78kHousing & Shelter$9kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $175k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORCESTER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$50,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$25,000
ATHLETES SERVING ATHLETES$25,000
MT WASHINGTON ALDERSGATE UMC$20,000
ST JOSEPH'S NURSING HOME$20,000
SAINT JAMES ACADEMY$15,000
I MATTER TOO CORPORATION$15,000
ST STEPHEN'S CHURCH$15,000
OPERATION SMILE$10,000
MCDONOGH SCHOOL$10,000
GRACE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH$10,000
SISTERS ACADEMY OF BALTIMORE$10,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$8,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING FOUNDATION$5,000
MD FOOD BANK$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DELAWARE HOSPICE: $5k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $6k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $6k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $6k → 14%DAKONIA INC: $9k → 8%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
MI
NY
PA
CA
VA
MD
DE
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 25 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
18

Total granted

$1.2M
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+23%

Still filing today

44%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IM
    I MATTER TOO CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $114k · revenue +34%
  • AS
    ATHLETES SERVING ATHLETES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +48%
  • MS
    MCDONOGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • DI
    DIAKONIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue +27%
  • AR
    ANIMAL RESCUE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $9k
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
2
Saint Joseph's Mercy Care Services Inc

We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…

—
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
St Paul Place Specialists Inc

To provide specialty physician services to patients of mercy medical center.

—
5
Mercy Medical Center

Like the Sisters of Mercy before us, we witness God's healing love for all people by providing excellent clinical services within a community of compassionate care. As an independent Catholic hospital, we pledge to enhance the health of…

Health
6
Saint Mary Home Incorporated

We, mercy community health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming presence within our communities. saint mary home is a member of mercy community health and trinity health.

—
7
Adventist Healthcare Inc

We extend god's care through the ministry of physical, mental and spiritual healing.

—
8
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
9
The Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati Ohio

The organization's mission is to improve the health status of the community it serves.

Health
10
Villa Mary Immaculate

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. villa mary immaculate is a member of st. peter's health partners…

Health
11
Mercy Senior Care Inc

We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…

Human Services
12
Saint Joseph's Health System Inc

We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is I Matter Too Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $225,000 · OtherST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITALMT WASHINGTON ALDERSGATE UMC: $192,500 · OtherMT WASHINGTON ALDERSGATE UMCSHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $72,500 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENST JOSEPH'S NURSING HOME INC: $57,000 · OtherST JOSEPH'S NURSING HOME INCST STEPHEN'S CHURCH: $45,000 · OtherSISTERS ACADEMY OF BALTIMORE INC: $40,000 · OtherSAINT JAMES ACADEMY: $30,000 · OtherVICTORY AND PRAISE WORSHIP MINISTRY: $29,000 · Other+25 more: $158,550 · Other+25 moreI MATTER TOO CORPORATION: $114,000 · Youth DevelopmentI MATTER …ATHLETES SERVING ATHLETES: $89,650 · Recreation & SportsMCDONOGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $50,000 · EducationCARSON SCHOLARS FUND INC: $30,000 · EducationWORCESTER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $69,000 · AnimalsWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $43,000 · Human ServicesDIAKONIA INC: $8,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 · Human ServicesDELAWARE HOSPICE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $25,000 · ReligionTurning Point for God: $5,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 · ReligionTURNING POINT COUNSELING INC: $2,500 · Religion+1 more: $1,000 · Religion
Other$849,550Youth Development$114,000Recreation & Sports$89,650Education$80,000Animals$69,000Human Services$61,500Religion$38,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetI MATTER TOO CORPORATION: $114,000 over 9y, 15% of budgetATHLETES SERVING ATHLETES: $89,650 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetWORCESTER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $69,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetST JOSEPH'S NURSING HOME INC: $57,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMCDONOGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $50,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $43,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCARSON SCHOLARS FUND INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $25,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING UP MISSION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIAKONIA INC: $8,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTurning Point for God: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE HOSPICE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGILCHRIST HOSPICE CARE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT COUNSELING INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHome for the Aged of Little Sisters of the Poor: $1,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetCENTER FOR A HEALTHY MARYLAND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetELIJAH HOUSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds I MATTER TOO CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ATHLETES SERVING ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds WORCESTER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH'S NURSING HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds MCDONOGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CARSON SCHOLARS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING UP MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds DIAKONIA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Turning Point for God ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds GILCHRIST HOSPICE CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT COUNSELING INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

T Rowe Price Program …The Marion I & Henry …The Kahlert Foundatio…Verizon FoundationMorgan Stanley Global…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Natl Christian Charit…Network for Good
T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving IncMD13.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The Marion I & Henry J Knott Foundation Inc · The Kahlert Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Haugh Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Haugh Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Diakonia Inc: 51% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Center for a Healthy Maryland Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Helping Up Mission Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Delaware Hospice Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Gilchrist Hospice Care Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Mcdonogh School Incorporated: 0% of income from government
  • Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Haugh Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home