Skip to content
Harold R Swanton and Winifred Swanton at a glance

· Private foundation

Harold R Swanton and Winifred Swanton

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$144k
Granted FY2026still arriving
6
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2026.

Health$698kHuman Services$44kFood & Nutrition$34k
02FY2026 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$23,241
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VENICE FAMILY CLINIC$43,241
CALIFORNIA AQUATIC THERAPY$28,241
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$23,241
WESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER$23,241
ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION$13,241
LIFE STEPS FOUNDATION$13,241
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–26, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $13k → 14%THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $7k → 14%THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%LIFE STEPS FOUNDATION: $13k → 14%LIFE STEPS FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%VALLEY FOOD BANK: $5k → 14%LIFE STEPS FOUNDATION: $9k → 14%LIFE STEPS FOUNDATION: $7k → 14%LIFE STEPS FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$719k · 10 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2026, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$719k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+6%

Still filing today

90%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VENICE FAMILY CLINIC
    6× · 2021–2026 · $171k · revenue +56%
  • WESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER
    6× · 2021–2026 · $141k · revenue +91%
  • CA
    California Aquatic Therapy & Wellness Center Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $115k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • SB
    SOUTH BAY FAMILY HEALTHCARE CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -70%
  • RM
    RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +6%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANKgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Laguna Beach Community Clinic

The mission of laguna beach community clinic (lbcc) is to provide excellent medical care regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
2
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
3
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
4
Equity Health

Our mission is to ensure health care access to quality comprehensive health care services for persons who are medically needy or medically under-served and have traditionally experienced difficulty in getting care from traditional sources.

—
5
All Inclusive Community Health Cent

The organization provides health care and other related services to medically underserved populations in Los Angeles County.

Health
6
Imperial Beach Community Clinic

Operate clinics to providing primary healthcare to people of all ages in imperial beach and surrounding communities and southwest San Diego county place emphasis on patient satisfaction in a sensitive environment.

—
7
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
8
Harbor Community Clinic Inc

To provide quality, comprehensive, healthcare and supportive services to those in our community, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
9
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
10
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
11
Santa Rosa Community Health Centers

The Santa Rosa Community Health Centers are dedicated to providing excellent, comprehensive primary health care, prevention, and health education for people who are uninsured and underinsured in Santa Rosa, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
12
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Venice Family Clinic; the most unlike its peers is Foodbank of Southern California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $170,741 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINICWESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $140,991 · HealthWESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTERNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $103,241 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTHWILMINGTON COMMUNITY CLINIC: $46,805 · HealthWILMINGTON COMMUNITY CLINICSANSUM CLINIC: $25,000 · HealthCalifornia Aquatic Therapy & Wellness Center Inc: $115,000 · Recreation & SportsCalifornia Aquat…THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $48,466 · Human ServicesTHE ACHIEVABLE…LIFE STEPS FOUNDATION INC: $44,391 · Human ServicesLIFE STEPS FOU…RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE: $5,000 · Human ServicesCALIFORNIA AQUATIC THERAPY: $28,241 · OtherSOUTH BAY FAMILY HEALTHCARE CENTER: $20,000 · OtherRESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE VALLEY FOOD BANK: $4,400 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $2,500 · OtherFOODBANK OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $20,000 · Food & NutritionSTUDENT LUNCHBOX INC: $2,150 · Food & Nutrition
Health$486,778Recreation & Sports$115,000Human Services$97,857Other$55,141Food & Nutrition$22,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $170,741 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $140,991 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCalifornia Aquatic Therapy & Wellness Center Inc: $115,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $103,241 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $48,466 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetWILMINGTON COMMUNITY CLINIC: $46,805 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLIFE STEPS FOUNDATION INC: $44,391 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSANSUM CLINIC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOODBANK OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH BAY FAMILY HEALTHCARE CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENT LUNCHBOX INC: $2,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation Hos…Direct ReliefS Mark Taper Foundati…California Physicians…Delta Dental Communit…The Ahmanson Foundati…The Ralph M Parsons F…The Annenberg Foundat…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Direct Relief · S Mark Taper Foundation · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Harold R Swanton and Winifred Swanton funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Harold R Swanton and Winifred Swanton. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harold R Swanton and Winifred Swanton’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home