· Private foundation
Harold R Swanton and Winifred Swanton
Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2026.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VENICE FAMILY CLINIC | $43,241 |
| CALIFORNIA AQUATIC THERAPY | $28,241 |
| NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH | $23,241 |
| WESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER | $23,241 |
| ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION | $13,241 |
| LIFE STEPS FOUNDATION | $13,241 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–26, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2026, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2026, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
VENICE FAMILY CLINIC6× · 2021–2026 · $171k · revenue +56%
WESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER6× · 2021–2026 · $141k · revenue +91%- CACalifornia Aquatic Therapy & Wellness Center Inc5× · 2021–2025 · $115k · revenue +26%
Funded once
- SBSOUTH BAY FAMILY HEALTHCARE CENTERone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -70%
- RMRESCUE MISSION ALLIANCEone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +6%
- LALOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANKone grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of laguna beach community clinic (lbcc) is to provide excellent medical care regardless of the patient's ability to pay.
Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.
Our mission is to ensure health care access to quality comprehensive health care services for persons who are medically needy or medically under-served and have traditionally experienced difficulty in getting care from traditional sources.
The organization provides health care and other related services to medically underserved populations in Los Angeles County.
Operate clinics to providing primary healthcare to people of all ages in imperial beach and surrounding communities and southwest San Diego county place emphasis on patient satisfaction in a sensitive environment.
Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…
To provide quality, comprehensive, healthcare and supportive services to those in our community, regardless of their ability to pay.
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.
The Santa Rosa Community Health Centers are dedicated to providing excellent, comprehensive primary health care, prevention, and health education for people who are uninsured and underinsured in Santa Rosa, regardless of ability to pay.
To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Venice Family Clinic and the most unlike its peers is Foodbank of Southern California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds California Aquatic Therapy & Wellness Center Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
- Who funds THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WILMINGTON COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds LIFE STEPS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SANSUM CLINIC ↗
- Who funds FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds SOUTH BAY FAMILY HEALTHCARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds STUDENT LUNCHBOX INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Direct Relief · S Mark Taper Foundation · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Harold R Swanton and Winifred Swanton funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.