· Private foundation
Hackstock Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k17 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ARRUPE JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL | $30,000 |
| ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION SCHOLARSHIPS (ACE) | $25,000 |
| ROCKY MOUNTAIN RETT ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| CARE (DESERT MTN CHAPTER) | $2,500 |
| ARIZONA MUSICFEST | $2,500 |
| ONCE UPON A ROOM | $2,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC | $1,500 |
| GOLDWATER INSTITUTE | $1,000 |
| NATHAN YIP FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA | $1,000 |
| PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| ACTON INSTITUTE | $1,000 |
| SUMMIT FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| OSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION (W SCHUKNECHT MEMORIAL) | $1,000 |
| THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RMROCKY MOUNTAIN RETT ASSOCIATION5× · 2020–2024 · $25k · revenue +122%
- AMARIZONA MUSICFEST INC5× · 2020–2024 · $13k · revenue +100%
- PUPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $4k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- OWOPERATION WALK DENVERone grant, 2022 · $25k
- BOBILL OF RIGHTS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $20k
FII - NATIONALone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -89%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
Philanthropy colorado is a nonprofit membership association for grantmakers throughout the state. its mission is strengthen colorado communities by bringing people, information and resources together.
See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…
The university of montana foundation inspires philanthropic support to enhance excellence and opportunity at the university of montana.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
Pbs12 colorado is re-imagining how public media can serve the community. content: creating unique, local content that shares stories and viewpoints that might otherwise be lost. education: preparing the next generation of content creators…
See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…
To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Once Upon a Room Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN RETT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA MUSICFEST INC ↗
- Who funds FII - NATIONAL ↗
- Who funds MARTIS CAMP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION DBA MARTIS CAMP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO CATTLEMEN'S AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds ONCE UPON A ROOM INC ↗
- Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds THE SUMMIT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds DESERT FOOTHILLS LIBRARY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds Legacy Connections ↗
- Who funds COLORADO BALLET ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty ↗
- Who funds PARENTS TELEVISION COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC ↗
- Who funds THE DENVER SANTA CLAUSE SHOP INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds Literary and Prologue Society of the Southwest ↗
- Who funds AZ Caddie and Leadership Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CHRIS RULE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Nathan Yip Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hackstock Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.