· Public charity
Greater Fayette Community Foundatio
To serve the local community by providing a means to receive and distribute charitable funds based on the wishes of the donor and on the changing needs of the community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 34 grants below total $644,004 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $882,504 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $238,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k28 grants · $390k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $232k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ARTS FOR RURAL TEXAS | $84,744 |
| VARIOUS GRANTS 5000 | $78,686 |
| BLINN COLLEGE | $68,500 |
| BREAKING BREAD OUTREACH | $22,500 |
| BASTROP COUNTY AFRICAN AMERICAN FOU | $22,500 |
| POWER 2 PROSPER COMMUNITY FOUDATION | $22,500 |
| ROUND TOP FESTIVAL INSTITUTE | $21,200 |
| FRIENDS OF MONUMENT HILL | $20,000 |
| ALLURE ALLIANCE INC | $20,000 |
| GUIDING HEARTS | $20,000 |
| AMERICAN YOUTHWORKS | $20,000 |
| SMITHVILLE WORKFORCE TRAINING | $15,000 |
| SCHULENBURG ISD | $14,595 |
| TURTLE WING FOUNDATION | $13,500 |
| DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 8% of Greater Fayette Community Foundatio’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 74% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 77% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $386k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TWTurtle Wing Foundation2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +9%
THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $18k · revenue +14%- BBBUGLE BOY FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $18k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $187k
- HCHOSPITAL CENTER OF EXCELLENCEone grant, 2023 · $78k
- FEFAYETTE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICEgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +30%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Festival of Texas Fiddling is dedicated to the preservation, presentation, and performance, and education about of all styles of fiddling and fiddle-associated music played historically and currently in the State of Texas.
Supporting the Texas Intrastate Fire Mutual Aid System
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Art Guild of Fayetteville Texas and the most unlike its peers is Allure Alliance Inc Random Black Girls. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 17% of your grantees by number, and just 13% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ART GUILD OF FAYETTEVILLE TEXAS ↗
- Who funds GREATER FAYETTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO ↗
- Who funds La Grange Lions Foundation LLC ↗
- Who funds FAYETTE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE ↗
- Who funds Wimberley Village Library Foundation ↗
- Who funds James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts ↗
- Who funds Allure Alliance Inc Random Black Girls ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN YOUTHWORKS ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MONUMENT HILL & KREISCHE BREWERY STATE HISTORIC SITES ↗
- Who funds Turtle Wing Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BUGLE BOY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BUILDING RESILIENCE INCLUSION DIVERSITY & GROWTH THRU EDUCATION aka BRIDGE ↗
- Who funds Smithville Workforce Training Center ↗
- Who funds St Mark's Medical Center Foundation ↗
- Who funds LA GRANGE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds Hays County Food Bank ↗
- Who funds Homeless Outreach Mitigation and Emergency Center ↗
- Who funds ELGIN CARES ↗
- Who funds OUTSIDERS ANONYMOUS ↗
- Who funds RECOVERYWERKS ↗
- Who funds Hays Cares ↗
- Who funds AND THEN A NEW DAY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fayette Resale Incorporated · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · Austin Community Foundation Inc · The Stanzel Family Foundation Inc · The Burdine Johnson Foundation · St David's Foundation · Texas Mutual Insurance Company · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Greater Fayette Community Foundatio funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Greater Fayette Community Foundatio?
Find your warmest path to Greater Fayette Community Foundatio through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.