Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts

James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts (Texas) receives grants from 50 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,973,194 to it, the largest being DALLAS JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($500,000). 24 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 52% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$3.0M
Funders on record
50
Grants received
$2.0M
Net assets
$17M
24/50 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 13%
01What it does

What James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts does

Mission

James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts operates Round Top Festival Institute, a center for performance and learning, which assembles music mentors with students and experts in arts/humanities to present cultural programs for student and public benefit.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. The James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts was established as a school to (a) conduct education and training for young performers, (b) provide and develop an advanced level of curriculum, faculty and facilities for instruction and year-round public performances and (c) conduct festivals, workshops and other educational activities for artistic training, research, and education of the general public.See Schedule O for additional details. Round Top Music Festival: Annually, one hundred or so advanced young music students representing an average of eleven countries come to study under the organization's accomplished music faculty and six different conductors from around the world. The young artists work with the faculty to study and improve their instrumental and performance skills and learn and perform chamber music programs and a new orchestral concert each week. Their instruction is tuition-free. The students pay a nominal fee to cover part of their room and board. The James Dick Foundation provides housing and meals to the young artists, faculty, and guest conductors on our 110-acre campus. The August-to-April Concert Series includes a variety of performances including…

    $2,677,973 spent$582,971 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $2,677,973.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.9M) Expenses 100 ($2.6M) Net assets 100 ($12M)2018 Revenue 109 ($2.0M) Expenses 99 ($2.6M) Net assets 100 ($12M)2019 Revenue 103 ($1.9M) Expenses 99 ($2.6M) Net assets 94 ($11M)2020 Revenue 83 ($1.5M) Expenses 80 ($2.1M) Net assets 90 ($11M)2021 Revenue 85 ($1.6M) Expenses 82 ($2.1M) Net assets 86 ($10M)2022 Revenue 144 ($2.7M) Expenses 102 ($2.6M) Net assets 86 ($10M)2023 Revenue 457 ($8.5M) Expenses 120 ($3.1M) Net assets 142 ($17M)2024 Revenue 161 ($3.0M) Expenses 116 ($3.0M) Net assets 143 ($17M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (161)Expenses (116)Net assets (143)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $10M to $17M (+65%).

$14M
$12M
$12M
$11M
$11M
$10M
$17M
$17M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 2% · 2021 11% · 2022 10%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

64% of James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (63% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 5,395 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$737k
’17
−$557k
’18
−$648k
’19
−$551k
’20
−$534k
’21
$25k
’22
$5.4M
’23
−$20k
’24
2.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1415161314121213
Joined·+3+1+0+3+2+0+2
No longer listed·2032401
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 9 funders to 17 funders, grant income rose $107k → $169k.

15 of 50 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 52% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $516k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest James Dick Foundation Endowment Trust). These are real filings, and they are not money James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts raised.

From the IRS filings of James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 50 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 25% of grant income, and it takes 6 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 6 funders to its left

53% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts.

25%
largest funder
39%
top three
~11
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 47% · 2018 20% · 2019 26% · 2020 26% · 2021 23% · 2022 23% · 2023 15% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

48% of James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 48% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

52% of James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $942k that is directly attributable, 85% of it comes from Texas funders.

NY
OH
PA
CA
DE
GA
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.0M arriving through sponsors registered in 12 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts's revenue grew 61% between 2017 and 2024.

Operating margin−1% · below the median
Months of reserve2.8mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)7% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 5,136 arts & culture nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

86% of spending goes to programs.

Program 86%Management 11%Fundraising 3%

Governance

13
board members
92%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

82%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • James Dick Foundation Endowment Trust · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts?
James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts (Texas) receives grants from 50 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,973,194 to it, the largest being DALLAS JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($500,000). 24 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 52% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts have?
IRS filings report 50 organizations giving $1,973,194 in grants to James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts, 24 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts?
DALLAS JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $500,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 50 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing