Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Stanzel Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$449k
Granted FY2024still arriving
79
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$1.8MYouth Development$623kCommunity Improvement$196kArts & Culture$148kHuman Services$129kPhilanthropy$55kHousing & Shelter$36kAnimals$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 79 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k72 grants · $210k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $124k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $115k
$3,275
Median grant
2
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHAMPION VALLEY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$60,000
BLINN COLLEGE FOUNDATION$55,000
AND THEN A NEW DAY$31,000
SENIOR CONNECTIONS$31,000
COLORADO COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$28,000
TURTLE WING FOUNDATION$18,500
FAYETTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$15,000
FAYETTE COUNTY COMMUNITY THEATRE$5,500
ARTS FOR RURAL TEXAS - FINE ARTS$5,000
VICTORIA COLLEGE - ZELDA ALLEN SCHOOL OF NURSING$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,775
Individual grant recipient$3,275
Individual grant recipient$3,275
Individual grant recipient$3,275
Individual grant recipient$3,275
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NAVIDAD VALLEY COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $40k → 11%AND THEN A NEW DAY: $31k → 11%NAVIDAD VALLEY COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $27k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.7M · 175 repeat orgs$231k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +235% since the first grant, against +52% for the ones you funded once.

175 repeat relationships — 60 still active in FY2024, 115 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

175
45

Total granted

$2.7M
$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+235%
+52%

Still filing today

3%
2%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $132k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    Turtle Wing Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $162k · revenue +235%
  • NV
    NAVIDAD VALLEY COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS
    2× · 2022–2023 · $67k · revenue +414% · 60% of their budget
  • FC
    FAYETTE COUNTY COMMUNITY THEATRE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $36k · revenue +339%

Funded once

  • BC
    BLINN COLLEGE - SCHULENBURG CAMPUS
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • FC
    FAYETTE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +52%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fayette County Commission On Aging Incorporated

The fayette county commission on aging serves and represents those adults 60 years of age and older in fayette county. the emphasis is on improving the quality of life of those fayette county citizens, 60 and above, and providing the…

2
Fayette Area Historical Initiative

Historical and African American Acheivem

Arts & Culture
3
Fayette Alliance Connecting Together Resources

To coordinate resources with other like minded groups in the community to promote safe and healthy fayette county.

Health
4
FwC Community Services
5
Fayette County Charitable Foundation

The organization uses their funds to give grants to area not-for-profit organizations.

6
Fayette County Commission On Aging

Activities for the elderly

7
Fayetteville Elementary Home and School Association

We are an organization to help support and enrich our school aged children at the Elementary school and in the community. We provide activities and events for the students, as well as support for the teachers and staff to provide items…

8
Fayette County Cultural Trust

The mission of the fayette county cultural trust is to enrich the area's quality of life by promoting our cultural, artistic, historic, and natural assets and by creating partnerships to revitalize communities and further economic…

Arts & Culture
9
Fayette County Fiber Festival

To create appreciation and support for fiber and the associated arts through exposure, education and economic opportunity.

Recreation & Sports
10
Fayette County Economic Development

The fayette county economic development commission (fcedc) is a nonprofit (28e) countywide economic development corporation. the primary purpose of fcedc is to enhance job opportunities for the citizens of the fayette county area. fcedc…

11
Fayette Chamber of Commerce

Partnering with local businesses and organizations to promote the community and strengthen the local economy.

12
Wyoming County Special Needs Association
Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is And Then a New Day and the most unlike its peers is Mini Horse Helpers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 239 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHAMPION VALLEY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB — $616,000 · OtherCHAMPION VALLEY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBNAVIDAD VALLEY COMMUNITY CONNECTOR — $196,000 · OtherNAVIDAD VALLEY COMMUNITY CONNECTORBLINN COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $109,000 · OtherARTS FOR RURAL TEXAS - FINE ARTS — $109,000 · Other+191 more — $1,566,006 · Other+191 moreTurtle Wing Foundation — $161,500 · EducationNAVIDAD VALLEY COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS — $67,000 · Human ServicesAND THEN A NEW DAY — $31,000 · Human ServicesGREATER FAYETTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO — $55,000 · PhilanthropyFAYETTE COUNTY COMMUNITY THEATRE — $35,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,596,006Education$161,500Human Services$98,000Philanthropy$55,000Arts & Culture$35,500

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTurtle Wing Foundation — $161,500 over 8y, 15% of budgetBLINN COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $109,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetNAVIDAD VALLEY COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS — $67,000 over 2y, 60% of budgetGREATER FAYETTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO — $55,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetFAYETTE COUNTY COMMUNITY THEATRE — $35,500 over 5y, 25% of budgetAND THEN A NEW DAY — $31,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetMINI HORSE HELPERS — $20,000 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetFAYETTE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $8,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Turtle Wing Foundation
  • Who funds BLINN COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NAVIDAD VALLEY COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS
  • Who funds GREATER FAYETTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO
  • Who funds FAYETTE COUNTY COMMUNITY THEATRE
  • Who funds AND THEN A NEW DAY
  • Who funds MINI HORSE HELPERS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fayette Resale IncorporatedTX20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fayette Resale Incorporated · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · Greater Fayette Community Foundatio · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Stanzel Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Stanzel Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Stanzel Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 239 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph