· Private foundation
Foundation for Educational Excellence
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $229k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+1 grant · $400k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BREES DREAM FOUNDATION | $400,000 |
| BUILDSTRONG ACADEMY | $166,379 |
| GREENLIGHT FUND | $155,260 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER | $119,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO | $118,880 |
| HOOLA NA PUA- CO CENTRAL UNION CHURCH | $116,445 |
| HOME BUILDERS INSTITUTE | $116,445 |
| STEAD SCHOOL | $100,000 |
| COLORADO OPEN GOLF FOUNDATION | $97,630 |
| Individual grant recipient | $95,000 |
| COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION (TEMPLE GRANDIN EQUINE CENTER) | $77,630 |
| DENVER POLICE FOUNDATION | $64,408 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF CO | $62,104 |
| TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION | $58,815 |
| EAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $48,815 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $383k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSThe STEAD School5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue ×25
- COCOLORADO OPEN GOLF FOUNDATION INC3× · 2021–2024 · $620k · revenue +32% · 32% of their budget
- CDCOLORADO DREAM FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2023 · $514k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- DUDENVER UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $526k
- TOThe Other Side Academygraduatedone grant, 2023 · $119k · revenue +40%
- MHMILE HIGH MONTESSORI EARLY LEARNING CENTone grant, 2019 · $105k · revenue +14%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…
With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
Ascend College Prep is a public high school for 10-12th grade students in Colorado Springs and the surrounding area. Our Mission is to "Prepare and inspire students to become lifelong learners and responsible citizens through rigorous…
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
Soar charter school was founded in 2010 and is built on the premise that we should "expect more" from our public schools. soar students create full and meaningful lives, enrich our democracy, and contribute to a more just society.
The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.
Kipp colorado's mission is to equip our students with the academic skills and character strengths necessary to succeed in college and careers.
Denver children's home restores hope and health to traumatized children and families through a comprehensive array of therapeutic, educational, and community-based services.
Springboard collaborative combines targeted student instruction with parent training in an incentivized system that closes the literacy gap, by transferring the summer from a barrier into a springboard for financially disadvantaged…
Education of students with learning differences
To support college students in innovative, affordable paths to in-demand careers and financial freedom.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Public Schools Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Challenge Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The STEAD School ↗
- Who funds Buildstrong Academy ↗
- Who funds COLORADO OPEN GOLF FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
- Who funds BREES DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREENLIGHT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds WARREN VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds The Other Side Academy ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds HOME BUILDERS INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Fields of Hope ↗
- Who funds MILE HIGH MONTESSORI EARLY LEARNING CENT ↗
- Who funds HERE TOMORROW INC ↗
- Who funds PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HO'OLA NA PUA ↗
- Who funds TRUE NORTH INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds INVEST IN KIDS ↗
- Who funds SEWALL CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds DENVER POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC ↗
- Who funds BOOK TRUST ↗
- Who funds TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Building Talent Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds Amp the Cause ↗
- Who funds EAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Strive Preparatory Schools ↗
- Who funds A Sanctuary for Military Families Inc DBA Project Sanctuary ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Daniels Fund · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation · Denver Broncos Foundation · Boettcher Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Connie Burwell White and William W White Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Foundation for Educational Excellence funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.