· Private foundation
Floyd Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k74 grants · $89k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $58k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $185k
- $250k+1 grant · $800k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY | $800,000 |
| WAYLAND COMMUNITY POOL INC | $110,000 |
| HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS | $75,000 |
| PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| CASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION | $12,750 |
| YOSEMITE CONSERVANCY | $10,000 |
| HOOVER INSTITUTION | $10,000 |
| VALLEY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE SMOKIES | $7,500 |
| STANFORD UNIVERSITY | $6,300 |
| ARIZONA CANCER FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN | $6,000 |
| MERCYWORLDWIDE | $5,500 |
| SHINING START FOUNDATION | $5,250 |
| USA SWIMMING FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| HARVARD UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
126 repeat relationships — 69 still active in FY2025, 57 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY8× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +10%
- YFYOSEMITE FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +50%
- CHCHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC6× · 2017–2022 · $526k · revenue +117%
Funded once
- PPROLITERACYone grant, 2023 · $75k
- SPSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INCone grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue +13%
- TGThe Geneva School Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +82%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…
The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
131 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 131 of the 179 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds YOSEMITE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AVENIDAS ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds WAYLAND COMMUNITY POOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
- Who funds CASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children Inc ↗
- Who funds OKIZU FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds USA Swimming Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY INITIATIVES ↗
- Who funds MERCYWORLDWIDE INC ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC SKYLINE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE ALLIANCE FOR FLORIDA'S NATIONAL PARKS INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED ↗
- Who funds THE PENINSULA BRIDGE PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds THE CANCER KICKERS SOCCER CLUB ↗
- Who funds SHINING STARS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds University of the Pacific ↗
- Who funds Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds Lowell Alumni Association ↗
- Who funds Neighbor Brigade Inc ↗
- Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
- Who funds The Geneva School Inc ↗
- Who funds Silicon Valley Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC ↗
- Who funds PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The Palo Alto Community Fund · Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Atkinson Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Philanthropic Ventures Foundation · Stephen S Smith and Paula K Smith Family Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Floyd Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- St Mary's Center for Women & Children Inc — 40% of income from government
- The Home for Little Wanderers Inc — 38% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Feeding South Florida Inc — 5% of income from government
- Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc — 4% of income from government
- Feed the Children Inc — 1% of income from government
- Pet Alliance of Greater Orlando Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.