Skip to content
Episcopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Episcopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities

Episcopal Impact Fund has a vision of a Bay Area where all our neighbors have the opportunities and resources they need to thrive

$478k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$597kHuman Services$538kReligion$517kHealth$259kYouth Development$185kCrime & Legal$48kFood & Nutrition$42kCivil Rights$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $386,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $477,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $91,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $374k
$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Greater Richmond Interfaith Project$45,000
Center for Domestic Peace$40,000
Beyond Emancipation$40,000
San Francisco SafeHouse$40,000
Youth Spirit Artworks (Tiny House Empowerment Village)$40,000
Nonprofit Housing Association of Northern California (NPH)$40,000
Alameda Point Collaborative$40,000
Sister to Sister 2Serenity House Oakland$40,000
Human Investment Project Inc (HIP Housing)$30,000
Sojourn Chaplaincy$19,400
Ohlhoff Recovery Programs$6,100
Grace Cathedral Jail Ministry$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $542k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NEW CREATION HOME MINISTRIES: $30k → 8%ABUNDANT GRACE COASTSIDE WORKER: $10k → 7%ABUNDANT GRACE COASTSIDE WORKER: $10k → 7%New Creation Home Ministries: $30k → 8%Alameda Point Collaborative: $40k → 10%ABUNDANT GRACE COASTSIDE WORKER: $8k → 7%Center for Domestic Peace: $40k → 8%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF MARIN: $25k → 8%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $10k → 9%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $10k → 9%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $10k → 9%San Francisco SafeHouse: $40k → 10%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $25k → 10%YMCA OF EAST BAY: $10k → 10%Episcopal Community Services: $5k → 10%Housing Consortium of the East Bay: $10k → 10%Beyond Emancipation: $40k → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $30k → 10%Beyond Emancipation: $30k → 10%Raphael House: $25k → 10%A DIAMOND IN THE RUFF: $10k → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $10k → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $10k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $24k → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $10k → 10%PARENT VOICES OAKLAND: $20k → 10%Parent Voices Oakland: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 33 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
61

Total granted

$1.4M
$782k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+26%

Still filing today

52%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $236k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OE
    Oakland Elizabeth House
    3× · 2019–2023 · $90k · revenue +83%
  • S2
    SISTER-TO-SISTER 2 INCORPORATED
    2× · 2022–2024 · $65k · revenue +99%
  • RH
    RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $49k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • AO
    ARIEL OUTREACH MISSION
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -44% · 28% of their budget
  • GC
    GLOBAL COMMUNICATION EDUCATION & ART
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • 3S
    3RD STREET YOUTH CENTER AND CLINICgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bay Area Community Services Housing Corp

Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.

Housing & Shelter
2
Bay Area Community Services Inc

BACS' mission is to uplift under-served individuals and their families by doing "whatever it takes." BACS helps people experiencing homelessness, housing insecurity, or behavioural health challenges while balancing other complications like…

—
3
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
4
San Francisco Network Ministries Housing Corporation

San Francisco Network Ministries Housing Corporation works to empower and support women who are experiencing housing instability and sexual exploitation or trafficking, by creating survivor-centered spaces, services advocacy and community…

Unclassified
5
Homeward Bound of Marin

Homeward Bound is the main provider of emergency shelter, supportive housing and services for people overcoming a crisis of homelessness in Marin County, California. Our mission of "opening doors to safety, dignity, hope, and…

Housing & Shelter
6
Homeless Prenatal Program Inc

Founded in 1989 to provide prenatal care for lowincome and homeless women, HPP has evolved into a dynamic family resource center with a holistic model that integrates a wide array of services to address the specific needs of each client…

Health
7
Community Forward Sf Inc

Community Forward SF's support services create pathways from crisis to long-term stability through our Women's Wellness Pathway, a proven continuum linking a 24/7 drop-in center, shelter, transitional housing, behavioral health care, and…

Health
8
Larkin Street Youth Services

The mission of Larkin Street Youth Services is to create a continuum of services that inspires youth to move beyond the street. We will nurture potential, promote dignity, and support bold steps by all.

Human Services
9
Abode Services

Abode services offers housing programs linked to supportive services for homeless families, single adults and youth. housing options include permanent supportive housing rental subsidy assistance, rapid rehousing and emergency shelter.…

Housing & Shelter
10
Bonita House Inc

To empower people living with mental health and co-occurring substance use challenges to achieve recovery, self-sufficiency, and deeply connected, meaningful lives within their communities.we do this by: delivering culturally responsive…

—
11
Bayview Hunters Point for Community Improvement

Provide support services for the community relating to mental health, substance abuse, youth services & violence prevention.

—
12
Union Station Homeless Services

We work to end homelessness through housing solutions, supportive services, and connection to community. we advocate for equitable and just systems that ensure all individuals and families will have a safe place they can call home.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornerstone Community Development Corporation; the most unlike its peers is The Regeneration Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/45
Grantees still filing
31/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER RICHMOND INTERFAITH PROGRAM GRIP: $105,000 · OtherGREATER RICHMOND INTERFAITH PROGRAM GRIPEPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE DIOCESE OF CALIFORNIA: $67,000 · OtherYOUTH SPIRIT ARTWORKS: $50,000 · OtherGLOBAL COMMUNICATION EDUCATION & ART: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherFESCO: $45,000 · OtherHOME & HOPE: $45,000 · OtherATTITUDINAL HEALING CONNECTION: $45,000 · OtherBAYSHORE CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $45,000 · OtherHOPE SOLUTIONS: $45,000 · OtherSOJOURN: $43,350 · OtherARIEL OUTREACH MISSION: $50,000 · Other+57 more: $656,665 · Other+57 moreBEYOND EMANCIPATION: $130,000 · Human ServicesBEYOND EMANCIPATIONNew Creation Home Ministries: $60,000 · Human ServicesNew Creation Home Ministr…RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $49,282 · Human ServicesRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRAN…Center for Domestic Peace: $40,000 · Human ServicesCenter for Domestic PeaceALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE: $40,000 · Human ServicesALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATI…PARENT VOICES OAKLAND: $40,000 · Human ServicesPARENT VOICES OAKLANDSan Francisco Safehouse: $40,000 · Human ServicesSan Francisco SafehouseMONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $30,000 · Human ServicesMONUMENT CRISIS CENTERAbundant Grace Coastside Worker Inc: $28,000 · Human ServicesFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $25,000 · Human ServicesST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MARIN COUNTY: $25,000 · Human Services+4 more: $35,100 · Human Services+4 moreOakland Elizabeth House: $90,000 · Housing & ShelterOakland Eli…NON-PROFIT HOUSING ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterNON-PROFIT …Human Investment Project Inc: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterHuman Inves…REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING …BUILDING OPP FOR SELF-SUFFICIENCY: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterBUILDING OP…Winter Nights Family Shelter Inc: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterWinter Nigh…Contra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterGilead House: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterYOUTH SPIRIT ARTWORKS: $40,000 · Youth Development3RD STREET YOUTH CENTER AND CLINIC: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentWEHOPE: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentMindful Life Project: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentSISTER-TO-SISTER 2 INCORPORATED: $65,000 · HealthHENRY OHLHOFF HOUSE: $18,300 · HealthCALIFORNIA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE ASSOCIATION: $40,000 · Civil RightsAttitudinal Healing Connection Inc dba The Center for ArtEsteem: $20,000 · Civil RightsSojourn Chaplaincy Inc: $58,200 · Philanthropy
Other$1,292,015Human Services$542,382Housing & Shelter$250,000Youth Development$130,000Health$83,300Civil Rights$60,000Philanthropy$58,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBEYOND EMANCIPATION: $130,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetGREATER RICHMOND INTERFAITH PROGRAM GRIP: $105,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetOakland Elizabeth House: $90,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetSISTER-TO-SISTER 2 INCORPORATED: $65,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetNew Creation Home Ministries: $60,000 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetSojourn Chaplaincy Inc: $58,200 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetARIEL OUTREACH MISSION: $50,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $49,282 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCALIFORNIA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE ASSOCIATION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCenter for Domestic Peace: $40,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPARENT VOICES OAKLAND: $40,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetYOUTH SPIRIT ARTWORKS: $40,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSan Francisco Safehouse: $40,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetNON-PROFIT HOUSING ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $40,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget3RD STREET YOUTH CENTER AND CLINIC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWEHOPE: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHuman Investment Project Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMindful Life Project: $30,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetAbundant Grace Coastside Worker Inc: $28,000 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SAN FRANCISCO: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBUILDING OPP FOR SELF-SUFFICIENCY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MARIN COUNTY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAttitudinal Healing Connection Inc dba The Center for ArtEsteem: $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetWinter Nights Family Shelter Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetLoaves and Fishes of Contra Costa: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHENRY OHLHOFF HOUSE: $18,300 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GUBBIO PROJECT INC: $15,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetCORNERSTONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetA DIAMOND IN THE RUFF INC: $10,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetHOUSING CONSORTIUM OF THE EAST BAY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of the East Bay: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN PREGNANCY CLINIC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetContra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY EMERGENCY SHELTER COALITION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEpiscopal Community Services: $5,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE REGENERATION PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetECOLOGY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco Fou…Kaiser Foundation Hos…East Bay Community Fo…Sunlight GivingUnited Way of the Bay…Tipping Point Communi…Marin Community Found…Silicon Valley Commun…Jewish Community Fede…Bernard E & Alba Witk…Lowell Berry Foundati…Dean and Margaret Les…
The San Francisco FoundationCA55.2× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · East Bay Community Foundation · Sunlight Giving · United Way of the Bay Area · Tipping Point Community · Marin Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Bernard E & Alba Witkin Charitable Foundation · Lowell Berry Foundation · Dean and Margaret Lesher Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Episcopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Episcopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 101 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Episcopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home