Skip to content
Elliot Mitchell Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Elliot Mitchell Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$14kEducation$2kPhilanthropy$1kFood & Nutrition$750Community Improvement$500International$400Human Services$300Animals$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$750
Median grant
5
States reached
$97k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Boomer Esiason Foundation$2,500
The Lymphatic Malformation institute$1,000
Michael J Fox Foundation$750
Prtners Foundation$500
The ALS Association$500
Sitar Art Center$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $550) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MONTGOMERY HOSPICE: $250 → 8%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $200 → 14%CHARITYWATER: $100 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
PA
CT
UT
VA
MD
TN
SC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15k · 6 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
14

Total granted

$15k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
0%

Still filing today

83%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BE
    BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +59%
  • PF
    Partners Foundation
    3× · 2021–2025 · $2k · revenue +151%
  • TL
    THE LYMPHATIC MALFORMATION INSTITUTE
    2× · 2021–2025 · $2k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS OF GREENVILLE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $750 · revenue +153%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $750
  • AL
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN
    one grant, 2024 · $250 · revenue -46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
2
The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation Inc

The multiple myeloma research foundation (mmrf) is the largest nonprofit in the world solely focused on accelerating acurefor multiple myeloma patient. we drive the development and delivery of next-generation therapies, leverage data to…

Health
3
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
4
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy
5
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
6
Parkinson's Foundation Inc

Make life better for people with parkinson's disease by improving care and advancing research toward a cure.

Health
7
Answer Als

To find solutions for people living with als now and for the future by utilizing knowledge of patients, leading researchers and technology to seek immediate solutions to improve the lives of those living with als until a treatment or cure…

Health
8
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
9
The National Fragile X Foundation

The national fragile x foundation serves the entire fragile x community to live their best lives by providing the knowledge, resources, and tools until, and even after, more effective treatments and a cure are achieved.

Health
10
Als One Inc

The organization is a partnership of world leaders in als research and care focused on expediting breakthrough treatments and ultimately a cure for als while providing resources and equipment to those living with the disease now. the team…

Health
11
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
12
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assn; the most unlike its peers is All for Recovery Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
10/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $4,600 · HealthBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATIONALL FOR RECOVERY INC: $2,930 · HealthALL FOR RECOVERY INCPartners Foundation: $2,250 · HealthPartners FoundationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $750 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH+2 more: $450 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $2,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAN…Individual grant recipient: $750 · OtherIndividual grant reci…AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS MN MINNESOTANORTH DAKOTASOUTH DAKOTA: $500 · OtherAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL S…Jewish Women International: $225 · OtherJewish Women Internat…CUPID CHARITIES: $200 · OtherRESNA JOEY WALLACE FUND: $200 · Other+1 more: $125 · OtherTHE LYMPHATIC MALFORMATION INSTITUTE: $2,000 · PhilanthropyTHE LYMPHATIC MA…UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF UTAH: $1,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH FE…MEALS ON WHEELS OF GREENVILLE INC: $750 · Food & NutritionMONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC: $250 · Human ServicesLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $200 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $100 · Human ServicesSave The Children Federation Inc: $200 · InternationalGOOD360: $200 · InternationalSITAR ARTS CENTER: $250 · Arts & CulturePARTNERSHIP FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $125 · Animals
Health$11,980Other$4,000Philanthropy$3,000Food & Nutrition$750Human Services$550International$400Arts & Culture$250Animals$125

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $4,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALL FOR RECOVERY INC: $2,930 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetPartners Foundation: $2,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LYMPHATIC MALFORMATION INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF UTAH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF GREENVILLE INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSITAR ARTS CENTER: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Women International: $225 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCUPID CHARITIES: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD360: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $125 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ge Aerospace Foundati…Raymond James Charita…Vanguard Charitable E…The Pfizer Foundation…National Philanthropi…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Ge Aerospace FoundationCT11.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elliot Mitchell Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elliot Mitchell Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Elliot Mitchell Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home