Skip to content
Ebell of Los Angeles Rest Cottage Association at a glance

· Private foundation

Ebell of Los Angeles Rest Cottage Association

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$159k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$474kHousing & Shelter$209kCrime & Legal$151kHealth$102kArts & Culture$54kEmployment$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $149k
$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES LOS ANGELES$15,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES GOOD SHEPHERD CENTER FOR HOMELESS WOMEN A$15,000
LOS ANGELES CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE$15,000
ST ANNE'S FAMILY SERVICES$15,000
HOME AGAIN LOS ANGELES$15,000
READY TO LAUNCH$12,000
TREASURES MINISTRIES$12,000
DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER$10,000
THE FID GROUP DBA FRIENDS IN DEED$10,000
YWCA GLENDALE AND PASADENA$10,000
HARVEST HOME INC$10,000
UPWARD BOUND HOUSE$10,000
CRITICAL MASS DANCE COMPANY$5,000
THE HOMEMORE PROJECT$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $330k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $10k → 14%HARVEST HOME: $10k → 14%HARVEST HOME INC: $10k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $10k → 14%HARVEST HOME INC: $10k → 14%THE TEEN PROJECT: $12k → 14%THE TEEN PROJECT: $10k → 14%THE TEEN PROJECT: $10k → 14%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $12k → 14%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $10k → 14%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $10k → 14%JENESSE CENTER INC: $5k → 14%JOURNEY HOUSE: $15k → 14%JOURNEY HOUSE: $10k → 14%ST ANNE'S FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 14%GOOD SHEPHERD CENTER FOR HOMELESS WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $12k → 14%ST ANNE'S FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%GOOD SHEPHERD CENTER FOR HOMELESS WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $10k → 14%LOS ANGELES HOUSE OF RUTH: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%LOS ANGELES HOUSE OF RUTH: $10k → 14%THE HOMEMORE PROJECT: $5k → 14%WESPARK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $15k → 14%WESPARK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $12k → 14%WESPARK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $10k → 14%WESPARK: $10k → 14%WESPARK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $10k → 14%HOUSE OF RUTH INC: $10k → 14%WOMEN CROWNED IN GLORYSAFE PASSAGE: $12k → 14%WOMEN CROWNED IN GLORYSAFE PASSAGE: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES LOS ANGELES: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$923k · 27 repeat orgs$99k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
8

Total granted

$923k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+35%

Still filing today

85%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthHousing & ShelterEmploymentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    Treasures Ministries
    6× · 2019–2025 · $66k · revenue +27%
  • WI
    WESPARK INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $57k · revenue +30%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $55k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • EO
    EBELL OF LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue -10%
  • LF
    LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION
    one grant, 2021 · $12k · revenue +22%
  • FI
    FRIENDS IN DEED
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Miracle House Foundation

Mentorship and housing assistant for women returning from incarceration

Human Services
2
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
3
Trauma Informed La
Civil Rights
4
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
5
Home for Homeless Women
—
6
Union Station Homeless Services

We work to end homelessness through housing solutions, supportive services, and connection to community. we advocate for equitable and just systems that ensure all individuals and families will have a safe place they can call home.

Human Services
7
Los Angeles Centers for Alcohol and Drug Abuse

Our Vision is to enhance the educational and economic well-being of the people we serve by means of direct human services, advocacy, and referrals.Our Mission is to save lives, unite families, and protect the community through addiction…

—
8
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
9
Ascencia

To lift people of out homelessness, one person, one family at a time.

Housing & Shelter
10
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
11
Support for Harbor Area Womens Lives

The mission of Support for Harbor Area Women's Lives (SHAWL) is to provide addicted women with support and services to enable them to remain clean and sober and become productive members of society.

Unclassified
12
Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness

Through a holistic approach to emotional well-being, Wellnest offers hope, healing, and opportunity to the children, young adults, families, and communities we serve. Our commitment remains steadfast as we enter our second century of…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Family Housing Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Ebell of Los Angeles. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
19/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNION RESCUE MISSION HOPE GARDENS FAMILY CENTER: $57,000 · OtherUNION RESCUE MISSION HOPE GARDENS FAMILY CENTERLOS ANGELES CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE: $55,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICEIndividual grant recipient: $52,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUPWARD BOUND HOUSE: $50,000 · OtherUPWARD BOUND HOUSENEW DIRECTIONS FOR VETERANS OASIS PROGRAM: $47,000 · OtherNEW DIRECTIONS FOR VETERANS OASIS PROGRAMJOURNEY OUT: $44,000 · OtherJOURNEY OUTST BARNABAS SENIOR CENTER OF LOS ANGELES: $43,000 · OtherST BARNABAS SENIOR CENTER OF LOS ANGELESJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE HOPE TRANSITIONAL: $25,000 · OtherYWCA OF GLENDALE AND PASADENA: $20,000 · Other+7 more: $82,000 · Other+7 moreTreasures Ministries: $66,000 · Human ServicesTreasures MinistriesWESPARK INC: $57,000 · Human ServicesWESPARK INCALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $32,000 · Human ServicesALEXANDRIA HOUSEThe Teen Project Inc: $32,000 · Human ServicesThe Teen Project IncHarvest Home Inc: $30,000 · Human ServicesHarvest Home IncJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $25,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELESJOURNEY HOUSE INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesJOURNEY HOUSE INCSt Anne's Family Services: $25,000 · Human ServicesSt Anne's Family ServicesWomen Crowned in Glory Safe Passage: $22,000 · Human ServicesWomen Crowned in Glory Safe PassageCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $22,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INCLOS ANGELES HOUSE OF RUTH: $20,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $20,000 · Human Services+3 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesCritical Mass Dance Company We Still Move: $42,000 · Arts & CultureEBELL OF LOS ANGELES: $12,000 · Arts & CultureMENTAL HEALTH ADVOCACY SERVICES INC: $30,000 · HealthHOME AGAIN LOS ANGELES: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterREADY TO LAUNCH: $22,000 · EmploymentTHE FID GROUP FRIENDS IN DEED: $20,000 · Religion
Other$475,000Human Services$396,000Arts & Culture$54,000Health$30,000Housing & Shelter$25,000Employment$22,000Religion$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTreasures Ministries: $66,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetWESPARK INC: $57,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetLOS ANGELES CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE: $55,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUPWARD BOUND HOUSE: $50,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetJOURNEY OUT: $44,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetST BARNABAS SENIOR CENTER OF LOS ANGELES: $43,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCritical Mass Dance Company We Still Move: $42,000 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $32,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetThe Teen Project Inc: $32,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHarvest Home Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH ADVOCACY SERVICES INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOURNEY HOUSE INC: $25,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetSt Anne's Family Services: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOME AGAIN LOS ANGELES: $25,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWomen Crowned in Glory Safe Passage: $22,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREADY TO LAUNCH: $22,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetTHE FID GROUP FRIENDS IN DEED: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES HOUSE OF RUTH: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetYWCA OF GLENDALE AND PASADENA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALCOHOLISM CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEBELL OF LOS ANGELES: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJenesse Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOMEMORE PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons F…The Rose Hills Founda…Shelter Partnership I…The Ahmanson Foundati…Kaiser Foundation Hos…California Community …QueensCareOrange County Communi…Carrie Estelle Doheny…Weingart FoundationS Mark Taper Foundati…The Green Foundation
The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA31.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc · The Ahmanson Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Community Foundation · QueensCare · Orange County Community Foundation · Carrie Estelle Doheny Foundation · Weingart Foundation · S Mark Taper Foundation · The Green Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ebell of Los Angeles Rest Cottage Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ebell of Los Angeles Rest Cottage Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ebell of Los Angeles Rest Cottage Association?

    Find your warmest path to Ebell of Los Angeles Rest Cottage Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ebell of Los Angeles Rest Cottage Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home