Skip to content
Dr Joseph P Dangelo Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Dr Joseph P Dangelo Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$205kEducation$94kHousing & Shelter$79kHuman Services$46kInternational$43kAnimals$38kReligion$33kFood & Nutrition$27kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANISIUS UNIVERSITY$50,000
NEW BEGINNINGS OF TAMPA$20,000
CHABAD MID MIAMI BEACH$6,000
COLEL CHABAD$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $5k → 9%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $5k → 14%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $2k → 26%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $3k → 9%WNY HEROES INC: $5k → 13%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $2k → 14%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $2k → 9%WNY HEROES INC: $2k → 13%CAROLINA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
SD
CA
KY
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$386k · 40 repeat orgs$204k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 39 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
27

Total granted

$386k
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+33%

Still filing today

78%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22’24
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NB
    NEW BEGINNINGS OF TAMPA INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $43k · revenue +66%
  • WINGS FLIGHTS OF HOPE
    4× · 2018–2022 · $18k · revenue +42%
  • OS
    OPERATION SMILE INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $16k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • UF
    UB FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • NP
    NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATIONISTS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • ECMC FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -51%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
8
Americares Foundation Inc

Americares mission is to help people and communities around the world access (see schedule o).

International
9
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
12
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Landmarks for Families Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/43
Grantees still filing
31/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOSA FUTURE HEALTH PROFESSIONALS: $30,000 · OtherHOSA FUTURE HEALTH PROFESSIONALSUB FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · OtherUB FOUNDATION INCWINGS FLIGHTS OF HOPE: $18,408 · OtherWINGS FLIGHTS OF HOPE+37 more: $231,484 · Other+37 moreOPERATION SMILE INC: $16,408 · InternationalOPERATION S…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $14,908 · InternationalMEDECINS SA…Mercy Ships International: $9,800 · InternationalMercy Ships…FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $9,800 · InternationalFOOD FOR TH…International Rescue Committee INC: $4,800 · InternationalInternation…PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · InternationalOPERATION CALIFORNIA INC: $2,000 · InternationalCANISIUS UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationCANISIUS UN…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $7,800 · EducationSTEPHEN SIL…NEW BEGINNINGS OF TAMPA INC: $42,908 · Housing & ShelterNEW BEGIN…Miami Rescue Mission Inc: $7,108 · Housing & ShelterMiami Res…ECMC FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthNATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $9,908 · HealthTHE MAVEN PROJECT: $7,108 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $5,108 · HealthNAMI National: $4,800 · HealthPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $4,800 · Health+2 more: $2,000 · HealthWOMEN IN DISTRESS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $9,908 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $9,908 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $7,108 · Human ServicesWNY HEROES INC: $7,108 · Human ServicesLandmarks for Families Inc: $5,108 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesSMALL PAWS RESCUE INC: $7,800 · AnimalsWWWPILOTSNPAWSORG INC: $7,800 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc: $7,108 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $5,000 · AnimalsSTORMHAVEN YOUTH RANCH INC: $4,800 · Animals
Other$304,892International$59,716Education$57,800Housing & Shelter$50,016Health$43,724Human Services$41,140Animals$32,508

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCANISIUS UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS OF TAMPA INC: $42,908 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetWINGS FLIGHTS OF HOPE: $18,408 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $16,408 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $14,908 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORIC CHARLESTON FOUNDATION: $10,108 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetECMC FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN IN DISTRESS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $9,908 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $9,908 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $9,908 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $9,908 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMercy Ships International: $9,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $9,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $7,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFlying Dentist Association Inc: $7,800 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetSMALL PAWS RESCUE INC: $7,800 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetWWWPILOTSNPAWSORG INC: $7,800 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $7,108 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $7,108 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $7,108 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCoral Ridge Ministries Media Inc: $7,108 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MAVEN PROJECT: $7,108 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWNY HEROES INC: $7,108 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMiami Rescue Mission Inc: $7,108 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $7,108 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ALIVE: $7,108 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $5,108 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLandmarks for Families Inc: $5,108 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAROLINA ART ASSOCIATION DBA GIBBES MUSEUM OF ART: $5,108 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE AMERICA: $4,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTORMHAVEN YOUTH RANCH INC: $4,800 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetNAMI National: $4,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $4,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $4,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $3,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION CALIFORNIA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Natl Christian Charit…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Pfizer Foundation IncNY10.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dr Joseph P Dangelo Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dr Joseph P Dangelo Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • New Beginnings of Tampa Inc: 50% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dr Joseph P Dangelo’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home