Skip to content

· Private foundation

Douglas and Maria Bayer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$87k
Granted FY2025still arriving
101
Grants FY2025still arriving
18
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Environment$140kArts & Culture$68kInternational$59kEducation$54kHealth$31kYouth Development$30kFood & Nutrition$25kCivil Rights$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 101 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$516
Median grant
18
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,149
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$4,000
FRIENDS OF THE BOUNDARY WATERS$2,581
BELLINGHAM FOOD BANK$2,131
CROHNS AND COLITIS FOUNDATION$2,093
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$2,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$2,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$2,000
DONORS CHOOSE$1,856
RAINIER SCHOLARS$1,500
LA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC$1,500
THE CRUCIBLE - AN EDUCATIONAL COLLABORATION OF ART INDUSTRY COMMUNITY$1,500
ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$1,500
ACLU FOUNDATION$1,500
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$1,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $2k → 12%NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $2k → 12%NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $2k → 12%NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $2k → 12%NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $1k → 12%OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $1k → 12%NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $1k → 12%NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $1k → 12%CHARITYWATER: $400 → 17%CHARITYWATER: $400 → 17%CHARITYWATER: $400 → 17%CHARITYWATER: $400 → 17%CHARITY WATER: $400 → 17%CHARITY WATER: $400 → 17%CHARITY WATER: $400 → 17%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT: $2k → 17%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT: $2k → 17%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT: $1k → 17%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT: $1k → 17%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT: $1k → 17%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT: $500 → 17%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$511k · 126 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

126 repeat relationships: 92 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

126
12

Total granted

$511k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+31%

Still filing today

76%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentInternationalEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NP
    NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $20k · revenue +145%
  • D
    DONORSCHOOSEORG
    6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +1%
  • NY
    NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES
    7× · 2019–2025 · $11k · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • MS
    MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYMUSIC BUILDING
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • DF
    DONORSCHOOSEORGATTENTION FINANCIAL OPERATIONS
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • SA
    SIERRA ARTS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
2
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
3
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
4
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
5
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
6
Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide

Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.

—
7
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
8
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
9
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
10
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
11
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
12
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Waterorg; the most unlike its peers is Bellevue Chamber Chorus. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

105 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 105 of the 148 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
105/105
Grantees still filing
82/105
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $29,798 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATIONTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $14,120 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE BOUNDARY WATERS: $10,237 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $10,000 · OtherAlternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank: $9,837 · Other+68 more: $186,773 · Other+68 moreENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $8,750 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL D…FRIENDS OF THE BOUNDARY WATERS WILDERNESS: $7,575 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE …NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $7,500 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURC…PROTECT OUR WINTERS: $6,000 · EnvironmentPROTECT OUR WIN…THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $5,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR P…EARTHJUSTICE: $4,750 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICECONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $3,897 · EnvironmentNorth Cascades Institute: $3,612 · EnvironmentOUTWARD BOUND INC: $3,567 · EnvironmentLAND STEWARDSHIP PROJECT: $3,548 · EnvironmentFORTERRA NW: $3,535 · EnvironmentThe Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust: $3,400 · EnvironmentEAGLE BLUFF ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $3,280 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION NW: $3,054 · EnvironmentISLANDWOOD: $2,868 · Environment+4 more: $6,327 · Environment+4 moreDONORSCHOOSEORG: $12,359 · EducationDONORSCHOOS…THE CRUCIBLE: $9,500 · EducationTHE CRUCIBL…RAINIER SCHOLARS: $5,850 · EducationRAINIER SCH…COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $4,648 · EducationCOLLEGE POS…THE BIG PICTURE COMPANY: $3,500 · EducationTHE BIG PIC…BARD COLLEGE: $3,500 · EducationBARD COLLEG…Yoga Behind Bars: $3,076 · EducationYoga Behind…THE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $3,000 · EducationTHE OAKLAND…SCIENCE IS ELEMENTARY INC: $2,500 · EducationROOM TO READ: $2,311 · EducationGREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP: $2,044 · EducationWILD WHATCOM: $2,040 · Education+3 more: $1,608 · EducationWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $6,890 · InternationalWORLD CENT…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,450 · InternationalMEDECINS S…ASHESI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $4,050 · InternationalASHESI UNI…GRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA: $3,825 · InternationalGRAMEEN FO…Save The Children Federation Inc: $3,060 · InternationalSave The C…INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $3,011 · InternationalINTERNATIO…THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $2,814 · InternationalTHE UNION …WATERORG: $2,625 · InternationalTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT: $2,577 · InternationalPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL: $2,376 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $2,036 · InternationalSpirit of America Worldwide: $1,975 · InternationalHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $1,900 · InternationalPENCILS OF PROMISE INCORPORATED: $1,845 · InternationalPATH: $1,843 · International+4 more: $3,945 · International+4 morePRO PUBLICA INC: $7,000 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLI…PATH WITH ART: $6,555 · Arts & CulturePATH WITH…BAAY: $5,066 · Arts & CultureBAAYEast Bay Center for the Performing Arts: $5,000 · Arts & CultureEast Bay …Kronos Performing Arts Association: $4,000 · Arts & CultureKronos Pe…Sanctuary Art Center: $3,300 · Arts & CultureSanctuary…BELLEVUE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $2,900 · Arts & CultureBELLEVUE …Arts Corps: $2,800 · Arts & CultureArts Corp…HIP HOP FOR CHANGE INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureHIP HOP F…SYMPHONY TACOMA: $2,030 · Arts & CultureSIERRA ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $1,275 · Arts & CultureNORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $10,670 · Human ServicesINTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $2,800 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $1,000 · Human ServicesLA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC: $10,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $4,186 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $3,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,338 · Health
Other$280,765Environment$76,663Education$55,936International$50,222Arts & Culture$43,926Human Services$21,470Health$18,524

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $14,120 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $12,359 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $10,670 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC: $10,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAlternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank: $9,837 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CRUCIBLE: $9,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetRUBY'S PLACE INC: $9,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $8,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOneJustice: $8,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE BOUNDARY WATERS WILDERNESS: $7,575 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $7,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH UPRISING: $7,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $6,890 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPATH WITH ART: $6,555 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPROTECT OUR WINTERS: $6,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRAINIER SCHOLARS: $5,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $5,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,450 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $5,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $5,139 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBAAY: $5,066 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetWASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION: $5,035 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $5,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEast Bay Center for the Performing Arts: $5,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA AVALANCHE CENTER: $4,750 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $4,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST AVALANCHE CENTER: $4,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $4,648 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLove Never Fails Inc: $4,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetREGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $4,186 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSolid Ground Washington: $4,060 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetASHESI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $4,050 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMOTIVATING INSPIRING SUPPORTING AND SERVING SEXUALLY EXPLOITED YOUTH: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKronos Performing Arts Association: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $3,897 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA: $3,825 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Cascades Institute: $3,612 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOUTWARD BOUND INC: $3,567 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLAND STEWARDSHIP PROJECT: $3,548 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFORTERRA NW: $3,535 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPhysicians For Reproductive Health: $3,532 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBELLEVUE CHAMBER CHORUS: $3,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetTHE BIG PICTURE COMPANY: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds LA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC ↗
  • Who funds Alternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds THE CRUCIBLE ↗
  • Who funds RUBY'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds OneJustice ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE BOUNDARY WATERS WILDERNESS ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH UPRISING ↗
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds PATH WITH ART ↗
  • Who funds PROTECT OUR WINTERS ↗
  • Who funds RAINIER SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
  • Who funds BAAY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds East Bay Center for the Performing Arts ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA AVALANCHE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST AVALANCHE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Love Never Fails Inc ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA28.7× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Whatcom Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Artsfund · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Medina Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Lucky Seven Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Douglas and Maria Bayer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Douglas and Maria Bayer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Ecotrust: 14% of income from government
  • Sustainable Northwest: 5% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
27report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Douglas and Maria Bayer Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Douglas and Maria Bayer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 148 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Douglas and Maria Bayer’s filings →

More from the funding graph