Skip to content

· Private foundation

Doris Goodwin Walbridge Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$423k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$390kHealth$283kEducation$228kAnimals$224kCrime & Legal$192kReligion$183kFood & Nutrition$170kHousing & Shelter$150kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $410k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MATTHIAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$25,000
NM IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER$25,000
GROWING UP NEW MEXICO$20,000
SANTA FE MOUNTAIN CENTER$20,000
FOOD DEPOT$20,000
LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES$20,000
SUNRISE CLINICS$20,000
ST ELIZABETH SHELTER$20,000
CENTRO SALVIA$20,000
KITCHEN ANGELS$20,000
YOUTH SHELTER & FAMILY SERVICES$20,000
CASA 1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT$15,000
INTERFAITH COMMUNITY CENTER$15,000
VILLA THERESE MEDICAL CLINIC$15,000
END OF LIFE OPTIONS$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $385k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $15k → 18%THINK NEW MEXICO: $15k → 12%NM IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER: $30k → 14%INSIDE OUT: $10k → 18%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $15k → 18%THINK NEW MEXICO: $15k → 12%NM IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER: $25k → 14%NM IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER: $25k → 14%NM IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER: $25k → 14%INSIDE OUT: $10k → 18%THINK NEW MEXICO: $15k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $10k → 12%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $50k → 12%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 12%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 12%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $15k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $15k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $15k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 34 repeat orgs$255k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against -19% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
13

Total granted

$1.9M
$140k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
-19%

Still filing today

56%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $115k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SE
    SAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $120k · revenue +42%
  • LC
    LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES
    4× · 2021–2025 · $110k · revenue +51%
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER
    4× · 2021–2025 · $105k · revenue +192%

Funded once

  • SC
    SF COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDTN
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR OPEN GOVERNMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • RL
    RURAL LIBRARIES
    one grant, 2024 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
2
Casa Milagro

To provide permanent housing and stabilizing support services to people exiting homelessness and managing mental health challenges.

Human Services
3
New Mexico Coalition to End Homelessness

To assist communities to create solutions to homelessness from prevention through permanent housing by using action, advocacy, and awareness.

Housing & Shelter
4
La Familia Medical Center

Our mission is to foster community well-being in partnership with our patients by providing excellent, accessible, family-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care. our vision is "healthy lives for all in a healthy santa fe"…

—
5
New Mexico Housing & Community Development Corporation

The new mexico housing and community development corporation is successfully promoting the availability and quality of affordable housing for moderate and low income families throughout new mexico through the means of property…

Housing & Shelter
6
Cplc New Mexico Inc

Cplc new mexico, inc. is dedicated to improving the economic well-being and quality of life for low-income residents of northern new mexico, while seeking to preserve the area's unique cultural, historical and social traditions and way of…

Community Improvement
7
Casa Fortaleza

Casa fortaleza provides advocacy, case management services, therapy, and outreach to victims/survivors of sexual violence.

Health
8
La Casa Inc

Provide emergency shelter care for adult persons and their children who are victims of domestic violence, and educate the community about the problems related to domestic violence is all its forms.

—
9
Casa Partners 4NMKIDS Inc

The casa program is a community-based program that recruits, trains and supports citizen-volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in courtrooms and communities. the organization serves children in…

Civil Rights
10
Justice Access Support and Solutions for Health

Casa de salud provides health care services to low-income, indigent and underserved populations in new mexico. primary care, counseling, acupuncture, massage, reiki, addictions treatment, syringe exchange, medical debt management, case…

Health
11
Santa Fe Family Service

Santa Fe Family Service helps individuals & families within the Santa Fe Independent School District by counsel, guidance, and other necessary assistance to achieve normal living, or the best possible adjustment for the welfare of the…

—
12
Hopeworks

To provide a place where homeless people could come and gain protection from the elements and provide for many other basic needs, such as meals, showers, clothing and health care. Also, to provide various services to homeless people such…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Fe Mountain Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Con Alma Health Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
18/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MATTHIAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $145,000 · OtherST MATTHIAS EPISCOPAL CHURCHINTERFAITH COMMUNITY CENTER: $115,000 · OtherINTERFAITH COMMUNITY CENTERCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $95,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLSAMUNDSEN HIGH SCHOOL: $85,250 · OtherAMUNDSEN HIGH SCHOOLESPANOLA ANIMAL SHELTER: $85,000 · OtherESPANOLA ANIMAL SHELTERFUR & FEATHERS ANIMAL RESCUE: $75,000 · OtherFUR & FEATHERS ANIMAL RESCUENM CENTER ON LAW & POVERTY: $65,000 · OtherGLOBAL PEARLS INC: $60,000 · OtherYOUTH SHELTERS: $60,000 · OtherCASA 1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT: $60,000 · OtherKITCHEN ANGELS INC: $60,000 · OtherSTREET HOMELESS ANIMAL PROJECT: $49,180 · Other+27 more: $384,500 · Other+27 moreLAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $110,000 · Human ServicesLAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY…NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER: $105,000 · Human ServicesNEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT …THE FOOD DEPOT: $65,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD DEPOTTHINK NEW MEXICO: $55,000 · Human ServicesTHINK NEW MEXICOYOUTH SHELTERS & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH SHELTERS & FAMI…COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY AGAINST VIO…Inside Out: $20,000 · Human ServicesSANTA FE MOUNTAIN CENTER INC: $105,000 · HealthSANTA FE …THE SAVILA COLLABORATIVE: $35,000 · HealthTHE SAVIL…SUNRISE CLINICS: $20,000 · HealthSUNRISE C…SCOTT'S HOUSE INC: $10,000 · HealthSCOTT'S H…THE JACKSON CHANCE FOUNDATION: $8,600 · HealthSAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION: $120,000 · Housing & ShelterSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $72,500 · PhilanthropyGROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyCON ALMA HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCOLLEGE AND CAREER PLAZA: $47,000 · EmploymentMOVING ARTS ESPANOLA INCORPORATED: $30,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,338,930Human Services$425,000Health$178,600Housing & Shelter$120,000Philanthropy$102,500Employment$47,000Arts & Culture$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION: $120,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetLAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $110,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetNEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER: $105,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetSANTA FE MOUNTAIN CENTER INC: $105,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $72,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT: $65,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL PEARLS INC: $60,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetKITCHEN ANGELS INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHINK NEW MEXICO: $55,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCOLLEGE AND CAREER PLAZA: $47,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetYOUTH SHELTERS & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SAVILA COLLABORATIVE: $35,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMOVING ARTS ESPANOLA INCORPORATED: $30,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTHWORKS: $27,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSUNRISE CLINICS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInside Out: $20,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetSAN MARTIN DE PORRES SOUP KITCHEN: $15,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetPET A BULLS INC: $12,500 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetFriendship Club: $12,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetSANTA FE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIENVENIDOS OUTREACH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSCOTT'S HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCON ALMA HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFEEDING SANTA FE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTHE JACKSON CHANCE FOUNDATION: $8,600 over 2y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE MOUNTAIN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL PEARLS INC ↗
  • Who funds KITCHEN ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds THINK NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE AND CAREER PLAZA ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SHELTERS & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SAVILA COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds MOVING ARTS ESPANOLA INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHWORKS ↗
  • Who funds GROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE CLINICS ↗
  • Who funds Inside Out ↗
  • Who funds SAN MARTIN DE PORRES SOUP KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds PET A BULLS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM56× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Anchorum St Vincent · St Vincent Hospital · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation · Thornburg Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · Bolene Charitable Trust · The Frost Foundation · The Abeles Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Doris Goodwin Walbridge Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Doris Goodwin Walbridge Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Doris Goodwin Walbridge Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Doris Goodwin Walbridge Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Doris Goodwin Walbridge’s filings →

    More from the funding graph