· Private foundation
Doris Goodwin Walbridge Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $410k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST MATTHIAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $25,000 |
| NM IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER | $25,000 |
| ST ELIZABETH SHELTER | $20,000 |
| SUNRISE CLINICS | $20,000 |
| YOUTH SHELTER & FAMILY SERVICES | $20,000 |
| CENTRO SALVIA | $20,000 |
| GROWING UP NEW MEXICO | $20,000 |
| SANTA FE MOUNTAIN CENTER | $20,000 |
| KITCHEN ANGELS | $20,000 |
| FOOD DEPOT | $20,000 |
| LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES | $20,000 |
| VILLA THERESE MEDICAL CLINIC | $15,000 |
| COLLEGE & CAREER PLAZA | $15,000 |
| GLOBAL PEARLS | $15,000 |
| ESPANOLA ANIMAL SHELTER | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $385k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against -19% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $115k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SESAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION6× · 2020–2025 · $120k · revenue +42%
- LCLAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES4× · 2021–2025 · $110k · revenue +51%
SANTA FE MOUNTAIN CENTER INC6× · 2020–2025 · $105k · revenue +167%
Funded once
- SCSF COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDTNone grant, 2021 · $25k
- FFFOUNDATION FOR OPEN GOVERNMENTone grant, 2021 · $20k
- RLRURAL LIBRARIESone grant, 2024 · $13k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide permanent housing and stabilizing support services to people exiting homelessness and managing mental health challenges.
To assist communities to create solutions to homelessness from prevention through permanent housing by using action, advocacy, and awareness.
Our mission is to foster community well-being in partnership with our patients by providing excellent, accessible, family-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care. our vision is "healthy lives for all in a healthy santa fe"…
The new mexico housing and community development corporation is successfully promoting the availability and quality of affordable housing for moderate and low income families throughout new mexico through the means of property…
Cplc new mexico, inc. is dedicated to improving the economic well-being and quality of life for low-income residents of northern new mexico, while seeking to preserve the area's unique cultural, historical and social traditions and way of…
Casa fortaleza provides advocacy, case management services, therapy, and outreach to victims/survivors of sexual violence.
Provide emergency shelter care for adult persons and their children who are victims of domestic violence, and educate the community about the problems related to domestic violence is all its forms.
The casa program is a community-based program that recruits, trains and supports citizen-volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in courtrooms and communities. the organization serves children in…
Casa de salud provides health care services to low-income, indigent and underserved populations in new mexico. primary care, counseling, acupuncture, massage, reiki, addictions treatment, syringe exchange, medical debt management, case…
Santa Fe Family Service helps individuals & families within the Santa Fe Independent School District by counsel, guidance, and other necessary assistance to achieve normal living, or the best possible adjustment for the welfare of the…
To provide a place where homeless people could come and gain protection from the elements and provide for many other basic needs, such as meals, showers, clothing and health care. Also, to provide various services to homeless people such…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Fe Mountain Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Con Alma Health Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE MOUNTAIN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
- Who funds KITCHEN ANGELS INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL PEARLS INC ↗
- Who funds THINK NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE AND CAREER PLAZA ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SHELTERS & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE SAVILA COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds MOVING ARTS ESPANOLA INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTHWORKS ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE CLINICS ↗
- Who funds GROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC ↗
- Who funds Inside Out ↗
- Who funds SAN MARTIN DE PORRES SOUP KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds PET A BULLS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Anchorum St Vincent · St Vincent Hospital · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation · Thornburg Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · Bolene Charitable Trust · The Frost Foundation · The Abeles Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Doris Goodwin Walbridge Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Doris Goodwin Walbridge Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Doris Goodwin Walbridge Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.