Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Donald J Slavik Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$315k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Animals$4.7MEnvironment$4.5MPhilanthropy$1.6MInternational$625kRecreation & Sports$394kEducation$247kYouth Development$140kArts & Culture$38kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $2.9M
  • $250k+1 grant · $315k
$123,150
Median grant
12
States reached
$85M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMPOWERS AFRICA INC$315,000
ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC$200,000
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$200,000
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC$200,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$200,000
YELLOWSTONE TO YUKON CONSERVATION INITIATIVE$175,000
MALIASILI INITIATIVES INC$150,000
PANTHERA CORPORATION$150,000
WILD SALMON CENTER$150,000
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC$150,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$150,000
AFRICAN PARKS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$142,000
VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC$123,150
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC$115,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY INC$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 57% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC: $150k → 9%FUTURE WEST: $100k → 10%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $600k → 7%FRIENDS OF THE SEA LION INC - PACIFIC MARINE MAMMA: $100k → 10%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK: $150k → 10%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100k → 7%PANTHERA CORPORATION: $150k → 17%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $100k → 28%WILDLIFE GUARDIANS: $100k → 14%THE SAINT LOUIS ZOO FOUNDATION: $100k → 21%WILD SALMON CENTER: $150k → 12%THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $190k → 9%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $200k → 14%AFRICAN PEOPLE & WILDLIFE FUND INC: $100k → 5%NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $100k → 6%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $320k → 7%NORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST: $100k → 9%MALIASILI INITIATIVES INC: $150k → 10%VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC: $123k → 9%GREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION INC: $100k → 10%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $293k → 7%PACIFIC MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $100k → 10%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $150k → 10%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100k → 7%PANTHERA CORPORATION: $150k → 17%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $100k → 28%SAINT LOUIS ZOO: $100k → 21%WILD SALMON CENTER: $150k → 12%THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $187k → 9%NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $100k → 6%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $200k → 7%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $200k → 7%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $115k → 10%PANTHERA: $150k → 17%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $200k → 7%OCEAN CONSERVANCY INC: $140k → 14%ENDANGERED WOLF CENTER: $150k → 11%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $150k → 7%EMPOWERS AFRICA INC: $315k → 17%OCEAN CONSERVANCY INC: $134k → 14%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $150k → 7%EMPOWERS AFRICA INC: $200k → 17%AFRICAN PARKS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $142k → 14%ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $200k → 17%ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $150k → 17%ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $150k → 17%AFRICAN PARKS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $152k → 17%SHARK CONSERVATION FUND: $150k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
MT
IL
NY
OR
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 28% of Donald J Slavik Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Donald J Slavik Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 13% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.8M · 29 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
19

Total granted

$7.8M
$825k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+25%

Still filing today

93%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $331k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEnvironmentEducationScience & TechYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $840k · revenue +95%
  • PC
    PANTHERA CORPORATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $550k · revenue +26%
  • YT
    YELLOWSTONE TO YUKON
    3× · 2022–2024 · $530k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • SC
    SHARK CONSERVATION FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $150k
  • FW
    Future West Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -43%
  • TS
    THE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +92%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
3
Cascadia Wildlands

Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…

Environment
4
Wildlife Conservation Global Inc

Wildlife conservation global, inc. operates the okapi conservation project (ocp) which works in the democratic republic of the congo with the institute in congo for the conservation of nature (iccn) and local communities throughout the…

Animals
5
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
6
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
7
Wildlife Sos

Protecting india's precious wildlife from poaching, habitat loss, and human exploitation since 1995.

Animals
8
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
9
Wilderness Conservation Foundation
Environment
10
International Wildlife Trust

Iwt is committed to combatting both the causes and effects of illegal wildlife trafficking by focusing on transnational organized crime groups who have escaped the consequences of their criminal activities to date.

Animals
11
Great Whale Conservancy

Protecting whales and their habitats

Animals
12
Int'l Union for Conservation of Nature & Natural Resources - Us

Iucn-us fund builds bridges between us donors and iucn by catalyzing, accelerating, funding and promoting iucn's work - conserving nature and natural resources in the united states and throughout the world.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wild Salmon Center and the most unlike its peers is Donald Slavik Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Christian Missionary Organi…Community FoundationsCommunity Arts CentersYouth Development CentersChristian Youth CampsAnimal Rescue and ShelterCommunity College Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%43%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%25%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/48
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,517

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/47
Grantees still filing
33/47
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC — $840,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INCPANTHERA CORPORATION — $550,000 · AnimalsPANTHERA CORPORATIONREWILD — $432,350 · AnimalsREWILDTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $376,850 · AnimalsTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARYWILD SALMON CENTER — $350,000 · AnimalsWILD SALMON CENTERWILD CANID SURVIVAL AND RESEARCH CENTER INC DBA ENDANGERED WOLF CENTER — $328,675 · AnimalsWILD CANID SURVIVAL AND RESEARCH CENTER INC…NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $300,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATIONWILDLIFE GUARDIANS — $270,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE GUARDIANSFRIENDS OF THE SEA LIONS INC DBA PACIFIC MARINE MAMMAL CENTER — $251,738 · AnimalsCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $200,000 · AnimalsWildlife Conservation Society — $200,000 · Animals+11 more — $668,898 · Animals+11 moreTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $1,780,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYTHE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC — $473,150 · OtherTHE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION I…SAINT LOUIS ZOO — $200,000 · OtherSAINT LOUIS ZOOSHARK CONSERVATION FUND — $150,000 · Other+15 more — $603,089 · Other+15 moreNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $1,092,950 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILA…ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $500,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PH…+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyYELLOWSTONE TO YUKON — $529,750 · EnvironmentYELLOWSTONE TO…OCEAN CONSERVANCY — $374,010 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVA…MALIASILI INITIATIVES INC — $200,000 · EnvironmentMALIASILI INIT…GREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION — $150,000 · EnvironmentGREATER YELLOW…NORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION — $150,000 · EnvironmentNORTHEAST WILD…Future West Inc — $100,000 · EnvironmentFuture West In…+1 more — $50,000 · EnvironmentEMPOWERS AFRICA INC — $515,000 · InternationalAFRICAN PARKS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $394,000 · Recreation & SportsCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $247,000 · EducationAFRICAN CONSERVATION CENTRE US — $20,000 · Education
Animals$4,768,511Other$3,206,239Philanthropy$1,593,950Environment$1,553,760International$515,000Recreation & Sports$394,000Education$267,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $1,780,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $1,092,950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC — $840,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPANTHERA CORPORATION — $550,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetYELLOWSTONE TO YUKON — $529,750 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetEMPOWERS AFRICA INC — $515,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $500,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC — $473,150 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetREWILD — $432,350 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAFRICAN PARKS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $394,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $376,850 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $374,010 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWILD SALMON CENTER — $350,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetWILD CANID SURVIVAL AND RESEARCH CENTER INC DBA ENDANGERED WOLF CENTER — $328,675 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $300,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWILDLIFE GUARDIANS — $270,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE SEA LIONS INC DBA PACIFIC MARINE MAMMAL CENTER — $251,738 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $247,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $200,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMALIASILI INITIATIVES INC — $200,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society — $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION — $150,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetNORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION — $150,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetKOPELION INC — $110,300 over 2y, 17% of budgetFuture West Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetTHE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAFRICAN PEOPLE & WILDLIFE FUND INC — $100,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetSHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INC — $100,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetSAVE OUR WILD SALMON — $100,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetWILD ENTRUST INTERNATIONAL — $80,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetWild Dolphin Project Inc — $64,620 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetPASADENA HUMANE — $60,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY — $57,271 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFlorida Wildlife Corridor Foundation Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PASADENA — $40,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetENTERTAINMENT 2 AFFECT CHANGE — $30,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL EXOTIC ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTucson Wildlife Center Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAFRICAN CONSERVATION CENTRE US — $20,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetPELICAN HARBOR SEABIRD STATION INC — $12,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp — $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAVANNAH SCIENCE MUSEUM INC — $7,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetANIMAL FUND — $5,000 over 1y, 83% of budgetDONALD SLAVIK FAMILY FOUNDATION — $2,578 over 1y, 100% of budgetWILDLIFE PROTECTION SOLUTIONS — $1,478 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community Found…The Liz Claiborne & A…Alexander Foundation …Felburn FoundationThe Horne Family Foun…National Geographic S…T Rowe Price Program …PatagoniaorgGs Donor Advised Phil…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Mightycause Charitabl…
Marin Community FoundationCA17.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · The Liz Claiborne & Art Ortenberg Foundation · Alexander Foundation Inc · Felburn Foundation · The Horne Family Foundation · National Geographic Society · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Patagoniaorg · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Donald J Slavik Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 32%
  • Wild Salmon Center — 49% of income from government
  • African People & Wildlife Fund Inc — 32% of income from government
  • Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Donald J Slavik Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Donald J Slavik Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home