Skip to content
Dekernion Family Fndtn Agy Uma at a glance

· Private foundation

Dekernion Family Fndtn Agy Uma

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$432kHealth$161kHuman Services$59kReligion$17kCivil Rights$15kFood & Nutrition$13kYouth Development$8kInternational$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EVERYCHILD FOUNDATION$12,000
BENEDICTINE SISTERS OF MOUNT ST$7,000
ST RAPHAEL SCHOOL$3,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$1,500
OCLA$1,000
FEEDING AMERICA$500
PARA LOS NINOS$500
Individual grant recipient$500
SPLC$250
ST PAUL THE APOSTLE CHURCH$200
MEALS ON WHEELS$200
SANTA MONICA COLLEGE FOUNDATION$200
SMC EMERITUS COLLEGE$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $2k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $500 → 14%GOOD SHEPHERD CENTER: $1k → 14%GOOD SHEPHERD CENTER: $500 → 14%LES AMIES: $1k → 14%LES AMIES: $1k → 14%EVERYCHILD FOUNDATION: $12k → 14%EVERYCHILD FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%EVERYCHILD FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%EVERYCHILD FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%EVERYCHILD FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%OUR CHILDREN LA: $3k → 14%OUR CHILDREN LA: $1k → 14%MEALS ON WHEELS WEST: $2k → 14%MEALS ON WHEELS WEST: $500 → 14%MEALS ON WHEELS WEST: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
MI
NY
OH
PA
CA
VA
KS
DC
HI
LA
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$644k · 28 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
35

Total granted

$644k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+26%

Still filing today

61%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionInternationalHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LU
    LOYOLA UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2018–2022 · $265k · revenue +31%
  • TE
    The Everychild Foundation
    5× · 2018–2025 · $38k · revenue +6%
  • CO
    CASA OF LOS ANGELES
    3× · 2018–2021 · $9k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • PS
    Portal Schools
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -45%
  • LH
    Loyola High School
    one grant, 2024 · $9k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
2
Communities in Schools of Los Angeles Inc

To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life. we work with public school systems, establishing relationship with superintendents, principals, educators, and community partners to…

Youth Development
3
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank

The organization's mission is to mobilize resources to fight hunger in our community. to fulfill its mission, the food bank:* sources and acquires nutritious food and other products and distribute them to people experiencing nutrition…

—
4
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
5
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
6
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

—
7
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
8
Cangress Dba Los Angeles Community Action Network

Community organizing, education, advocacy, leadership development, direct services and organizational development for communities faced with immense poverty.

Community Improvement
9
Hollywood Food Coalition

Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…

—
10
Los Angeles County Bar Association (Lacba)

Meeting the professional needs of los angeles lawyers, and improving the administration of justice.

—
11
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
12
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Para Los Ninos; the most unlike its peers is Portal Schools. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
20/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $265,000 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITYUCLA FOUNDATION: $27,950 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION+2 more: $2,200 · EducationBISHOP O'DOWD HIGH SCHOOL: $77,500 · OtherBISHOP O'DOWD HIGH SCHOOLST RAPHAEL SCHOOL: $14,490 · OtherST RAPHAEL SCHOOLPortal Schools: $10,000 · OtherLoyola High School: $9,300 · OtherCATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Other+50 more: $92,065 · Other+50 moreLSU HEALTH FOUNDATION NEW ORLEANS: $156,000 · HealthLSU HEALTH FOUNDATION NE…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthThe Everychild Foundation: $37,500 · Human ServicesOUR COMMUNITY LA FKA OUR CHILDREN LA: $4,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS WEST: $3,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $2,200 · Human ServicesLES AMIES INC: $2,000 · Human Services+2 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $9,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $500 · Food & NutritionCASA OF LOS ANGELES: $9,000 · Civil RightsHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $6,500 · Youth Development
Education$295,150Other$211,355Health$157,000Human Services$50,700Food & Nutrition$9,500Civil Rights$9,000Youth Development$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $265,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLSU HEALTH FOUNDATION NEW ORLEANS: $156,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetThe Everychild Foundation: $37,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $27,950 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPortal Schools: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCASA OF LOS ANGELES: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $9,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSt Anne's Foundation: $6,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR COMMUNITY LA FKA OUR CHILDREN LA: $4,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetMEDICAL BENEVOLENCE FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS WEST: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $2,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLES AMIES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISE AND HEALTHY AGING: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAR VISTA FAMILY CENTER: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC PALISADES LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC: $550 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFeeding America: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARA LOS NINOS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SANTA MONICA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBetter Business Bureau: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LSU HEALTH FOUNDATION NEW ORLEANS ↗
  • Who funds The Everychild Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Portal Schools ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds St Anne's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OUR COMMUNITY LA FKA OUR CHILDREN LA ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL BENEVOLENCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS WEST ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds LES AMIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …Klm FoundationThe Carol and James C…Adams Mastrovich Fam …The Ralph M Parsons F…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…American Endowment Fo…Donor Advised Charita…Natl Christian Charit…
California Community FoundationCA21.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Klm Foundation · The Carol and James Collins Foundation · Adams Mastrovich Fam Fdn · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dekernion Family Fndtn Agy Uma funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dekernion Family Fndtn Agy Uma. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dekernion Family Fndtn Agy Uma’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home