Skip to content
Crimmins Kelly Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Crimmins Kelly Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$36kInternational$34kAnimals$25kCivil Rights$22kFood & Nutrition$22kHealth$20kCrime & Legal$10kEnvironment$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$586k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER$6,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY NETWORK$5,000
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$5,000
ACLU OF COLORADO$5,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$4,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKIES$4,000
NRDC$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INTERNATIONAL MARINE MAMMAL PROJECT: $1k → 10%CENTER FOR GENDER AND REFUGEE STUDIES: $2k → 10%HOPE FOR PAWS: $2k → 14%NRDC: $3k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $2k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKIES: $4k → 12%ELEVENTH HOUR RESCUE: $2k → 4%GIVEWELL: $2k → 10%HOPE FOR PAWS: $1k → 14%NRDC: $3k → 17%ROCKY MOUNTAIN IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY NETWORK: $5k → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKIES: $3k → 12%ELEVENTH HOUR RESCUE: $1k → 4%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $3k → 17%ROCKY MOUNTAIN IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY NETWORK: $2k → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKIES: $3k → 12%ROCKY MOUNTAIN IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY NETWORK: $2k → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKIES: $2k → 12%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKIES: $2k → 12%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKIES: $2k → 12%EAST PTSA: $2k → 12%EAST PTSA: $2k → 12%COLORADO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $2k → 12%DENVER URBAN DEBATE LEAGUE: $3k → 12%COLORADO HUMANE SOCIETY & SPCA: $3k → 12%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE-DENV: $8k → 12%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE-DENV: $8k → 12%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $4k → 12%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $3k → 12%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $2k → 12%ACLU OF COLORADO: $5k → 12%ACLU OF COLORADO: $4k → 12%ACLU OF COLORADO: $3k → 12%ACLU OF COLORADO: $2k → 12%ACLU OF COLORADO: $2k → 12%FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $8k → 12%FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $5k → 12%FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $3k → 12%FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $3k → 12%FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $2k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER: $6k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER: $5k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER: $5k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER: $4k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER: $4k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER: $4k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER: $3k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MD
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$157k · 16 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
23

Total granted

$157k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+18%

Still filing today

56%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalAnimalsCivil RightsHealthEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $33k · revenue +40%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $24k · revenue +38%
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • DU
    Denver Urban Debate League
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue -49%
  • CA
    Coalition Against Trafficking In Women
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
  • TC
    THE CLEAR FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +815%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
2
The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals
3
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
4
International Committee of the Red Cross

The international committee of the red cross (switzerland)(icrc) is an impartial, neutral, and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and of violence…

International
5
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
Humane World for Animals Inc

Humane World for Animals, Inc., formerly known as the Humane Society of the United States (The Organization), seeks to tackle the root causes of animal cruelty and suffering. CONTINUED ON SCHEDULE O

Animals
8
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
9
Hope for China Dogs Rescue

At Hope for China Dogs, we are committed to combating the cruel and inhumane practice of the dog meat trade in China. We believe that every dog deserves to live a life free from pain and suffering, and we are dedicated to rescuing and…

Animals
10
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
11
Refugees International Inc

Refugees international advocates for lifesaving assistance, human rights, and protection for displaced people and promotes solutions to displacement crisis.

International
12
Environmental and Animal Defense

At Environmental and Animal Defense, our mission is to provide Colorado with access to affordable legal services for environmental and animal issues, in addition to protecting wildlife and their habitats through enforcement of the law. No…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Dumb Friends League; the most unlike its peers is Broadleaf Health and Education Alli. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC: $32,500 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INCACLU OF COLORADO: $16,300 · OtherACLU OF COLORADOPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKIES: $16,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKIESTHE COLORADO HUMANE SOCIETY & SPCA INC: $6,750 · OtherTHE COLORADO HUMANE SOCIETY & SPCA INC+18 more: $25,750 · Other+18 moreInternational Rescue Committee INC: $23,500 · InternationalInternational Resc…Coalition Against Trafficking In Women: $2,500 · InternationalCoalition Against …OPERATION CALIFORNIA INC: $1,000 · InternationalMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 · InternationalHURU INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 · International+1 more: $500 · InternationalFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $20,500 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF…HOPE FOR PAWS: $5,250 · AnimalsTHE 11TH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC T/A ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE: $3,250 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $3,000 · AnimalsHOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 · Animals+1 more: $400 · AnimalsROCKY MOUNTAIN IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY NETWORK: $9,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $500 · Civil RightsCOLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION: $500 · Civil RightsNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $9,500 · EnvironmentDenver Urban Debate League: $3,070 · Education
Other$97,300International$29,500Food & Nutrition$20,500Animals$12,900Civil Rights$10,000Environment$9,500Education$3,070

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC: $32,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $23,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $20,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY NETWORK: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLORADO HUMANE SOCIETY & SPCA INC: $6,750 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE FOR PAWS: $5,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 11TH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC T/A ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE: $3,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDenver Urban Debate League: $3,070 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCoalition Against Trafficking In Women: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $2,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION CALIFORNIA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHURU INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBroadleaf Health and Education Alli: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rose Community Founda…The Denver FoundationColorado Gives Founda…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for GoodAmerican Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Rose Community FoundationCO13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rose Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crimmins Kelly Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crimmins Kelly Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The 11TH Hour Animal Rescue Inc T/a Eleventh Hour Animal Rescue: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Crimmins Kelly Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home