· Public charity
Craig Hospital
Craig Hospital is a 93-bed, long-term acute care and rehabilitation hospital that provides care exclusively for patients with spinal cord and brain injury.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $209,100 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $231,302 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $22,202 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $107k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $81k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Craig Hospital Foundation | $81,000 |
| CHANDA PLAN FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| BRAIN INJURY ALLIANCE OF COLORADO | $20,000 |
| HOME BUILDERS FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| NATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED | $15,000 |
| HIGH FIVES NONPROFIT FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| CITY OF ENGLEWOOD | $11,800 |
| DENVER METRO CHAMBER LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION | $10,500 |
| CHANGE THE TREND | $8,000 |
| CROSS PURPOSE | $6,800 |
| ST ANTHONY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCraig Hospital Foundation4× · 2019–2024 · $726k · revenue +65%
- NSNATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED INC8× · 2017–2024 · $180k · revenue +59%
- BIBRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO8× · 2017–2024 · $148k · revenue +93%
Funded once
- CRCHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +86%
- DFDENVER FILM SOCIETYgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +164%
- OGOne Good Turnone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…
To bring conventions and leisure visitors to denver for the economic benefit of the city, the community, and our partners.
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
The colorado chamber of commerce mission is to enhance the business climate of the state of colorado by promoting a positive legislative and regulatory environment and providing programs and services for its members, economic education,…
To deliver meaningful news, music, and cultural experiences to everyone in colorado using the power of the human voice in all its forms
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
To advance the science of jurisprudence, secure the more efficient administration of justice, encourage the adoption of proper legislation, advocate thorough and continuing legal education, uphold the honor and integrity of the bar,…
To create patient-centered innovations to improve health care delivery by partnering with patients, health care organizations, academic institutions, and private practices.
Impact development fund helps people within our underserved communities seek fulfillment for themselves and their families by providing access to affordable living. we create these opportunities by delivering flexible capital to nonprofit…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce and the most unlike its peers is Denver Film Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Craig Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED INC ↗
- Who funds BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds PHAMALY THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds THE CHANDA PLAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HIGH FIVES NONPROFIT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HBA FOUNDATION DBA HOME BUILDERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DENVER FILM SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds DENVER METRO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds COLORADO NEUROLOGICAL INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds One Good Turn ↗
- Who funds THE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER METRO CHAMBER LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WINGS OVER THE ROCKIES AIR & SPACE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES BRAIN INJURY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds YOUNG AMERICANS CENTER FOR FINANCIAL EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S WORLD ON WHEELS ↗
- Who funds COLORADO CROSS DISABILITY COALITION ↗
- Who funds THE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds 911 DAY ↗
- Who funds CROSSPURPOSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · Mile High United Way Inc · Daniels Fund · The Colorado Health Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation · Ima Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Lumen Clarke M Williams Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Craig Hospital funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Christopher Reeve Foundation — 49% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.