Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lumen Clarke M Williams Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$896k
Granted FY2021
1,278
Grants FY2021
49
States reached
$192k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

99% of Lumen Clarke M Williams Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to American Online Giving Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Lumen Clarke M Williams Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 1007 organizations, $896k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

700
17
692
20
1007
21
19
22
0
23
0
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$5.7MEducation$1.7MFood & Nutrition$858kYouth Development$469kReligion$256kScience & Tech$149kHuman Services$148kHousing & Shelter$131kOther$0
02FY2021 · 1278 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k1271 grants · $538k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $269k
$188
Median grant
49
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DESTINATION IMAGINATION INC$192,000
THE UNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA INC$77,015
THE UNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA INC$36,563
MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC$16,113
COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC$13,480
NORTH MONROE BAPTIST CHURCH OF MONROE INC$12,000
UNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN$11,570
GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY$9,174
HEART OF FLORIDA UNITED WAY$9,070
MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC$8,661
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$7,611
UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY$7,131
UNITED WAY OF GREATER KANSAS CITY INC$6,850
LIFE CHURCH$6,250
UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN NEVADA INC$6,131
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $224k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EXPRESSIVE PATH INC: $500 → 7%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $813 → 8%VANDEMATARAM FOUNDATION USA INC: $500 → 8%WISE AREA RELIEF MISSION INC: $2k → 8%ECONOMIC COUNCIL HELPING OTHERS INC: $872 → 22%CASA DE PEREGRINOS INC: $4k → 23%INTERFAITH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $638 → 16%GIFT OF HOPE INC: $26k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $963 → 11%COMMUNITY SERVICES OF BROOMFIELD INC: $1k → 5%ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE SELF-HELP NETWORK INC: $500 → 9%PUYALLUP FOOD BANK: $26k → 9%OKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $17k → 17%CARRIES KIDS INC: $936 → 10%PROJECT SHARE OF CARLISLE: $17k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $625 → 8%SHARING MINISTRIES INC: $2k → 12%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE - NORTH CENTRAL: $2k → 5%NORTHWEST NEW JERSEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $872 → 7%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE - SOUTHEAST REG: $500 → 13%COVERING HOUSE: $750 → 9%ROCHESTER AREA INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY NETWORK INC: $750 → 14%SEWA INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 → 16%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $9k → 14%COMMUNITY ACTION SERVICES AND FOOD BANK INC: $17k → 8%WARREN VILLAGE INC: $625 → 12%NNEMAP INC: $35k → 15%CENTRAL FLORIDA YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $1k → 13%CENTRAL FLORIDA YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $500 → 13%COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CITRUS COUNTY INC: $26k → 17%URBANITES LEADING THE PIKES PEAK REGION INC: $1k → 9%ELDER CARE SERVICES INC: $17k → 19%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICE: $2k → 6%STAR OUTREACH - NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS: $872 → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF COLORADO INC: $732 → 12%NORTHWEST LIFE FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%NORTHWEST LIFE FOUNDATION: $500 → 9%FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO: $563 → 12%MILE HIGH MINISTRIES: $625 → 12%OCJ KIDS: $500 → 11%ARIZONA FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.9M · 456 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

456 repeat relationships — 303 still active in FY2021, 153 since wound down; 584 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

456
936

Total granted

$3.9M
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+34%

Still filing today

83%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionAnimalsHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC
    3× · 2017–2021 · $449k · revenue +44%
  • DI
    DESTINATION IMAGINATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $342k · revenue +169%
  • SHARE
    3× · 2017–2021 · $101k · revenue +115%

Funded once

  • MF
    MARION-POLK FOOD SHARE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +62%
  • AT
    Alternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bankgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $65k · revenue +99%
  • CA
    Christian Action Ministriesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $44k · revenue +62%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Benton & Lincoln Counties

United way works to increase the organized capacity of people to care for one another. united way is a funder, a mobilizer, a convener and a fundraiser. united way is a community builder, connecting people through philanthropy,…

2
United Way of Comal County

To engage the community and focus resources for those in need in comal county

Philanthropy
3
United Way of the Csra Inc

United way of the csra mobilizes the caring power of our community to make lasting change on the issues that matter most in our region. we want to ensure that children, young adults, and families have the tools and resources they need to…

4
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
5
United Way of Cleveland County Inc

The United Way of Cleveland County helps people by uniting resources and programs to responsibly meet the needs of our community.

Philanthropy
6
United Way of Etowah County Inc

United way brings together people and resources and collaborates with over 27 local non-profit agencies to advance the common good in etowah county.

7
United Way Manitowoc County Inc

United way's mission is to improve lives.

Philanthropy
8
Indiana Association of United Ways Inc

Indiana united way is the leading voice to advocate, engage, and partner with a strong united way network and key stakeholders to advance human well-being throughout indiana.

Philanthropy
9
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
10
United Way of Monongalia and Preston Counites Inc

The uwmpc enhances the quality of life in our community by helping those in need. we serve as a leader in building a stronger and healthier community by developing resources and creating partnerships to empower individuals to improve their…

Philanthropy
11
United Way of Washington County Maryland Inc

Through strategic leadership and investments, united way of washington county, md will impact community improvement and inspire collaboration to address critical needs in education, income and health.

Philanthropy
12
United Way of Jackson County

United way of jackson county (uwjc) is dedicated to creating a community rich in opportunities to eliminate poverty and allow all people to achieve financial stability and success. this emphasis on financial stability includes meeting…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of the Coastal Empire and the most unlike its peers is Faith to Faith Ministry Faith to Fatih Ministry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyImmigrant Worker SupportElementary Literacy TutoringSchool Parent OrganizationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Youth Development CentersAffordable Housing Construc…Developmental Disabilities …Youth Development ServicesEquine Therapy ProgramsPolicy Research and AdvocacyAddiction Recovery ServicesYmca Youth DevelopmentLgbtq+ Community SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Faith-Based Social ServicesPublic Library OperationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Domestic Violence ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportDance Arts OrganizationsSchool District FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Local History MuseumsPregnancy Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Community Arts CentersChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Jewish Community Organizati…Volunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Christian Youth CampsCommunity Food PantriesCancer Support ServicesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Christian Missionary Organi…Environmental Conservation …Youth Sports ProgramsSenior Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterIndependent K-12 SchoolsLocal Food System Organizat…Community FoundationsFood Banks and PantriesUnited Way Affiliates
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%42%10–20yr16%7%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%33%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%25/1,836
the rest of the field
13%
240,371/1,817,729

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

1190 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1190 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
280
Early backer (in before they grew)
1134/1190
Grantees still filing
762/1190
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC — $2,928,825 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INCUNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA INC — $888,599 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA INCMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC — $449,167 · PhilanthropyMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC+40 more — $986,892 · Philanthropy+40 moreDESTINATION IMAGINATION INC — $342,000 · OtherDESTINATION IMAGINATION…United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc — $109,412 · OtherUnited Way of Greater K…SHARE — $100,537 · OtherSHARENORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $66,126 · Other+120 more — $919,554 · Other+120 moreMARION-POLK FOOD SHARE INC — $100,000 · Food & NutritionAlternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank — $65,409 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST TN — $46,028 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $43,187 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC — $39,972 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST — $26,264 · Food & NutritionGoodRoots Northwest — $26,164 · Food & NutritionDURANGO FOOD BANK — $17,443 · Food & Nutrition+6 more — $48,526 · Food & NutritionNNEMAP INC — $34,885 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CITRUS COUNTY INC — $26,164 · Human ServicesPUYALLUP FOOD BANK — $26,164 · Human ServicesGIFT OF HOPE INC — $26,164 · Human ServicesFOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA INC — $24,676 · Human ServicesELDER CARE SERVICES INC — $17,781 · Human ServicesPROJECT SHARE OF CARLISLE — $17,532 · Human ServicesOKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC — $17,442 · Human ServicesCommunity Action Services and Food Bank — $17,442 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,549 · Human ServicesEMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION — $50,000 · EducationPEAK TO PEAK CHARTER SCHOOLS INC — $10,000 · EducationDesert Canyon Elementary School PTO Inc — $6,446 · EducationMATH & SCIENCE ACADEMY — $6,000 · EducationHUNTERDON POLYTECH EDUCATION ASSOCIATION — $5,000 · EducationSPOKANE VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $5,000 · EducationTHE RIVENDELL SCHOOL OF NORTHERN COLORADO — $5,000 · EducationDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX — $17,443 · ReligionGIRL SCOUTS OF COLORADO — $6,500 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$5,253,483Other$1,537,629Food & Nutrition$412,993Human Services$218,799Education$87,446Religion$17,443Youth Development$6,500

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC — $2,928,825 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA INC — $888,599 over 3y, 12% of budgetMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC — $449,167 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetDESTINATION IMAGINATION INC — $342,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY — $161,649 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Kansas City Inc — $109,412 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY — $106,269 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHARE — $100,537 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMARION-POLK FOOD SHARE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN NEVADA — $79,576 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHEART OF FLORIDA UNITED WAY INC — $79,559 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetVALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY — $69,420 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $66,126 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAlternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank — $65,409 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST TN — $46,028 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF RICHLAND COUNTY — $44,201 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetChristian Action Ministries — $43,606 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $43,187 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA — $41,872 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC — $39,972 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC — $36,715 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR LANE COUNTY — $34,885 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNNEMAP INC — $34,885 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST — $26,264 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGoodRoots Northwest — $26,164 over 1y, 18% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CITRUS COUNTY INC — $26,164 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetPUYALLUP FOOD BANK — $26,164 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGIFT OF HOPE INC — $26,164 over 1y, 15% of budgetFOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA INC — $24,676 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUnited Way of the Columbia-Willamette — $24,635 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL NEW MEXICO — $23,597 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT RIVERS UNITED WAY INC — $19,593 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN SHARING CENTER INC — $18,987 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $18,877 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH'S PROMISE — $18,444 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC — $17,851 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetELDER CARE SERVICES INC — $17,781 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT SHARE OF CARLISLE — $17,532 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetEMERGENCY FEEDING PROGRAM OF SEATTLE & KING COUNTY — $17,493 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX — $17,443 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDURANGO FOOD BANK — $17,443 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetOKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC — $17,442 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCommunity Action Services and Food Bank — $17,442 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY INC — $15,997 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN — $15,146 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS — $14,690 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFOOTHILLS UNITED WAY INC — $14,313 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Siemer InstituteOH49.7× affinity24 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Siemer Institute · Park National Bank Employees' Community Service Fund · AT&T Foundation · Grinnell Mutual Group Foundation · Centene Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · Libertygives Foundation · Pnc Foundation · Community Shares of Colorado Inc · Black Hills Corporation Foundation · United Way Worldwide · The Mosaic Company Foundation for Sustainable Food Systems

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lumen Clarke M Williams Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • United Way of Lane County31% of income from government
  • United Way of the Columbia-Willamette25% of income from government
  • United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc23% of income from government
  • Elder Care Services Inc22% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank21% of income from government
  • United Way of the Mid-Willamette Valley6% of income from government
  • The Christian Sharing Center Inc5% of income from government
  • Marion-Polk Food Share Inc5% of income from government
  • Food for Lane County5% of income from government
  • United Way of Marion County Inc4% of income from government
  • United Way of Northeast Florida Inc2% of income from government
  • United Way of Lake and Sumter Counties Inc1% of income from government
  • United Way Suncoast Inc1% of income from government
  • The United Way of Lee County Inc1% of income from government
  • Heart of Florida United Way Inc0% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc0% of income from government
  • United Way of the Big Bend Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
69report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph