Skip to content
Consumer Healthcare Products Association at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Consumer Healthcare Products Association

Empower self-care by preserving and expanding choice and availability of consumer healthcare products.

$362k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$5.4MPublic Benefit$257kCrime & Legal$108kEducation$106kEnvironment$86kCommunity Improvement$85kArts & Culture$79kCivil Rights$47kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $279,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $362,274 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $83,274 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $103k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$34M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STATE LEGISLATIVE LEADERS FOUNDATION$52,500
COMMUNITY ANTI$50,000
PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION$45,000
ATTORNEY GENERAL ALLIANCE$30,000
ASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION$25,000
MOUNT VERNON LADIES ASSOCIATION$10,000
DAVID A WINSTON HEALTH POLICY FELLOWSHIP$10,000
ALLIANCE FOR A STRONGER FDA RECOGNITION$10,000
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ASSOC EXECUTIVE$10,000
NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE$10,000
NATIONAL CONSUMER LEAGUE$7,500
ASAE BUSINESS SERVICES INC$7,000
ILLINOIS MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION$6,000
TENNESSEE RETAIL ASSOCIATION$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%STATE LEGISLATIVE LEADERS FOUNDATION: $53k → 8%PRODUCT QUALITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $19k → 22%CONFERENCE OF WESTERN ATTORNEYS GENERAL: $25k → 12%PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION: $105k → 17%INFORMA MEDIA INC: $17k → 17%ASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION: $90k → 7%COMMUNITY ANTI-DRUG COALITIONS OF AMERICA: $85k → 9%SAFE KIDS WORLDWIDE: $20k → 8%STATE LEGISLATIVE LEADERS FOUNDATION: $33k → 8%ATTORNEY GENERAL ALLIANCE: $30k → 12%PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION: $75k → 17%STATE LEGISLATIVE LEADERS FOUNDATION: $48k → 14%INFORMA MEDIA INC: $17k → 17%ASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION: $75k → 7%COMMUNITY ANTI-DRUG COALITIONS OF AMERICA: $75k → 9%ASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION: $55k → 11%STATE LEGISLATIVE LEADERS FOUNDATION: $33k → 8%CONFERENCE OF WESTERN ATTORNEYS GENERAL: $25k → 12%PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION: $55k → 17%STATE LEGISLATIVE LEADERS FOUNDATION: $35k → 14%ASTMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%COMMUNITY ANTI DRUG COALITIONS OF AMERICA: $75k → 9%ASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%ATTORNEY GENERAL ALLIANCE: $25k → 12%PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION: $45k → 17%AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ASSOC EXECUTIVE: $22k → 14%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR PHARMACEUTICAL: $31k → 6%ASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $50k → 7%COMMUNITY ANTI-DRUG COALITIONS OF AMERICA: $60k → 9%ATTORNEY GENERAL ALLIANCE: $25k → 12%PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION: $35k → 17%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR PHARMACEUTICAL: $12k → 6%ASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%COMMUNITY ANTI-DRUG COALITIONS OF AMERICA: $60k → 9%ATTORNEY GENERAL ALLIANCE: $25k → 12%CENTER ON ADDICTION: $140k → 17%ASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%COMMUNITY ANTI: $50k → 9%ATTORNEY GENERAL ALLIANCE: $25k → 12%PARTNERSHIP FOR A DRUG FREE AMERICA: $40k → 17%COMMUNITY ANTI-DRUG COALITIONS OF AMERICA: $50k → 9%PARTNERSHIP FOR A DRUG FREE AMERICA: $25k → 17%COMMUNITY ANTI-DRUG COALITIONS OF AMERICA: $25k → 9%COMMUNITY ANTI-DRUG COALITIONS OF AMERICA: $25k → 9%CHPA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2.0M → 14%CHPA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1.9M → 14%ALLIANCE FOR AGING RESEARCH: $15k → 14%PRODUCT MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.3M · 20 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
12

Total granted

$6.3M
$126k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
0%

Still filing today

85%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    CADCA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $505k · revenue +26%
  • PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $455k · revenue +73%
  • AA
    ASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $420k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • PQ
    PRODUCT QUALITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2018 · $19k
  • PM
    PRODUCT MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -75%
  • ND
    NATIONAL DENTAL ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Parenteral Drug Association Inc

To develop scientifically sound, practical technical information and resources to advance science and regulation for the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industry through the expertise of our global membership.

—
2
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such…

—
3
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
4
National Alliance of State Pharmacy Associations Inc

The mission of naspa is to enhance the success of state pharmacy associations in their efforts to advance the profession of pharmacy.

—
5
American Association of State Colleges and Universities

Aascu is a washington, d.c. based higher education association that represents the sector of over 500 regional public colleges, universities, and systems whose members share a learning and teaching centered culture, a commitment to…

Education
6
The National Association of State Workforce Agencies

The national association of state workforce agencies (naswa) mission is to enhance the state workforce agencies' ability to accomplish their goals, statutory roles and responsibilities.

—
7
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
8
Alliance for Pharmacy Compounding

To protect, promote and advance the art and science of pharmacy compounding.

—
9
Aoac International

Aoac international is an independent third-party association of analytical scientists recognized worldwide for bringing together stakeholders to reach consensus on the fitness for purpose for analytical methods needed in the areas of food,…

Health
10
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
11
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
12
National Alliance of Concurrent Enrollment Partnerships Inc

Advancing a national community to foster equity in dual and concurrent enrollment through accreditation, advocacy, research, and professional development.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partnership to End Addiction; the most unlike its peers is Product Management Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
18/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHPA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $3,893,039 · Community ImprovementCHPA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION+1 more: $6,500 · Community ImprovementPARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION: $455,000 · HealthPARTNERSHIP TO …STATE LEGISLATIVE LEADERS FOUNDATION INC: $210,000 · HealthSTATE LEGISLATI…American Botanical Council: $85,742 · HealthAmerican Botani…DAVID A WINSTON HEALTH POLICY FELLOWSHIP: $35,500 · HealthSAFE KIDS WORLDWIDE: $30,000 · Health+4 more: $39,500 · HealthASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $420,000 · OtherASTHMA AND AL…Partnership for a Drug-Free America: $65,000 · OtherPartnership f…AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ASSOCIATION EXECUTIVES: $61,600 · OtherAMERICAN SOCI…INFORMA MEDIA INC: $34,000 · OtherNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURES: $32,500 · OtherALLIANCE FOR AGING RESEARCH: $25,000 · Other+9 more: $108,500 · Other+9 moreCADCA: $505,000 · Youth DevelopmentConference of Western Attorneys General AG Alliance: $180,000 · EducationAmerican Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education: $97,500 · Education+1 more: $8,250 · EducationNATIONAL CONSUMERS LEAGUE INC: $54,000 · Public BenefitALLIANCE FOR A STRONGER FDA INC: $40,000 · Public BenefitTHE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION: $55,000 · Arts & Culture
Community Improvement$3,899,539Health$855,742Other$746,600Youth Development$505,000Education$285,750Public Benefit$94,000Arts & Culture$55,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHPA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $3,893,039 over 2y, 75% of budgetCADCA: $505,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetPARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION: $455,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $420,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetSTATE LEGISLATIVE LEADERS FOUNDATION INC: $210,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetConference of Western Attorneys General AG Alliance: $180,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education: $97,500 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetAmerican Botanical Council: $85,742 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetPartnership for a Drug-Free America: $65,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF ASSOCIATION EXECUTIVES: $61,600 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION: $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CONSUMERS LEAGUE INC: $54,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetALLIANCE FOR A STRONGER FDA INC: $40,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetDAVID A WINSTON HEALTH POLICY FELLOWSHIP: $35,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetSAFE KIDS WORLDWIDE: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetALLIANCE FOR AGING RESEARCH: $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTennessee Retail Association: $18,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetPRODUCT MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE: $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetILLINOIS MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL DENTAL ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWomen's Congressional Policy Institute: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMOBILIZE RECOVERY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRODUCT QUALITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $9,500 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetBOARD OF CONTROL FOR SOUTHERN REGIONAL EDUCATION: $8,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD & DRUG LAW INSTITUTE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTATE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS COUNCIL: $6,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pharmaceutical Resear…Association for Acces…Consumer Brands Assoc…Edison Electric Insti…AARPOpenRoad FoundationAmerican Hotel & Lodg…United States Pharmac…American Fuel and Pet…Ctia - the Wireless A…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of AmericaDC20.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Association for Accessible Medicines · Consumer Brands Association · Edison Electric Institute Inc · AARP · OpenRoad Foundation · American Hotel & Lodging Association · United States Pharmacopeial Convention · American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers · Ctia - the Wireless Association · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Consumer Healthcare Products Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Consumer Healthcare Products Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Safe Kids Worldwide: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Consumer Healthcare Products Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home