How much did UNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIAL CONVENTION grant in FY2024?

UNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIAL CONVENTION reported 12 grants totaling $498,078 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is UNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIAL CONVENTION based?

UNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIAL CONVENTION is based in MD.

UNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIAL CONVENTION

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

UNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIAL CONVENTION

To improve the health of people around the world through public standards and (see schedule o) related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

$498k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$100k

Largest

01What you fund

0179% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Health$969kCommunity Improvement$180kInternational$140kEducation$100kHuman Services$66kPublic Benefit$27kPhilanthropy$25kEnvironment$19kSocial Science$6kOther$406k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

dinner

2020

pharmacistspatientcareapha

2021

pharmaceuticaleducation nipteproductsawardsproduct

2022

producthealthcare

2023

advanceproduct

2024

platinumdialevelmeeting

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k3 grants · $20k
$10k–50k8 grants · $132k
$50k–250k1 grant · $100k

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$751M

Total assets

Largest grants

CORPORATE COUNCIL ON AFRICA THE$100,000
AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION (APHA)$28,500
ASSOCIATION FOR ACCESSIBLE MEDICINES$20,000
MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND$19,000
REAGAN UDALL FOUNDATION FOR THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION INC$15,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BOARDS OF PHARMACY$15,000
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC$14,998
ALLIANCE FOR AGING RESEARCH$10,000
CONSUMER HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION$10,000
MARCH OF DIMES$8,000
DIA-DRUG INFORMATION ASSOCIATION INC$6,000
WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS$6,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7% — the area typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.5M · 16 repeat orgs$477k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.5M

$323k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%

+11%

Still filing today

94%

79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $154k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationInternationalCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentSocial ScienceOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AF
APhA FOUNDATION
4× · 2020–2024 · $770k · revenue +164%
NM
NEWARK MENTORING MOVEMENT
3× · 2021–2023 · $59k · revenue +45%
NM
Newark Mentoring Movement
5× · 2018–2023 · $57k · revenue +26%

Funded once

CD
CONNECTED DMVgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $66k · revenue +244%
D
Devex
one grant, 2018 · $60k
Project hopegraduated
one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +85%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

American College of Physicians Inc

The American College of Physicians (ACP) is a national organization of internists - physicians who specialize in the prevention, detection and treatment (Continued on Schedule O)

Health

American Association of Colleges of

Advance pharmacy education, research, scholarship, practice and service.

Health

American Academy of Neurology

The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) is the leading voice in brain health. As the world's largest association of neurologists and neuroscience professionals with more than 40,000 members, the AAN offers access to continuing education,…

Community Improvement

Association of Clinical Research

To promote excellence in clinical research

Health

American Chemistry Council

The purpose of the council shall be the promotion of the interests of the business of chemistry in the united states of america, its territories and possessions and globally.

—

Alliance for Pharmacy Compounding

To protect, promote and advance the art and science of pharmacy compounding.

—

National Council for Prescription

Lead the industry in healthcare standards and solutions for the common good.

—

American College of Preventive Medicine

Advances the science and practice of disease prevention and health promotion.

Health

Federation of State Medical Boards of

Leader in medical regulation, serving as an innovative catalyst for effective policy & standards.

Health

United States Pharmacopeial Convention

To improve the health of people around the world through public standards and (see schedule o) related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health

National Association of Regulatory

To serve the public interest by improving the quality and effectiveness of public utility regulation.

—

American Association of State Colleges

Aascu elevates and transforms member institutions through effective public policy and leadership enabling its members to drive regional economic mobility through student access and success while helping to solve their communities' most…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alliance for Aging Research and the most unlike its peers is State University of Iowa Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2/36

the rest of the field

10%

1,356/12,965

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

32/33

Grantees still filing

22/33

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$969,449Other$455,760Community Improvement$180,000International$140,000Education$100,000Human Services$66,000Public Benefit$26,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of AmericaDC20.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · The Rockefeller Foundation · Consumer Healthcare Products Association · Association for Accessible Medicines · Gates Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation UNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIAL CONVENTION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: APhA FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~12 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 526039142 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on APhA FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 12 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 14% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to United States Pharmacopeial Convention?

Find your warmest path to United States Pharmacopeial Convention through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

UNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIAL CONVENTION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to United States Pharmacopeial Convention?

More from the funding graph

UNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIAL CONVENTION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to United States Pharmacopeial Convention?

More from the funding graph