Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit
PRODUCT MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE
PRODUCT MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $122,320 to it, the largest being National Electrical Manufacturers Association ($77,320). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2024
- $30k
- Funders on record
- 4
- Grants received
- $122k
- Net assets
- $0
What Product Management Alliance does
Mission
National coalition of organizations that believe that all parties share responsibility for effectively managing a product throughout its lifecycle.
As stated on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ.
Programs
Advocate in opposition to specific state and local EPRlegislation or regulation through testimony, writtencorrespondence and other advocacy tactics
$25,210 spent65% of program spendingEducate stakeholders about existing, voluntary market-based producerresponsibility efforts and the unintended consequences of shifting the costof product reclamation and disposal solely onto manufacturers
$12,416 spent32% of program spendingTransition to organization to formal, independent entity capable of pursuingmission in states across the country
$1,235 spent3% of program spending
The 3 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $38,861.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.
Balance sheet
Total assets at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $18k to $9k (−52%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2022: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $30k → $6k.
From the IRS filings of PRODUCT MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
PRODUCT MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 63% of grant income and the top three 88%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PRODUCT MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 50% · 2018 53% · 2019 53% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
PRODUCT MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE draws 75% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 2 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Organizations like PRODUCT MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Washington, D.C.
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PRODUCT MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds PRODUCT MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE?
- PRODUCT MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $122,320 to it, the largest being National Electrical Manufacturers Association ($77,320). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does PRODUCT MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE have?
- IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $122,320 in grants to PRODUCT MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of PRODUCT MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE?
- National Electrical Manufacturers Association is the largest funder on record, with $77,320 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like PRODUCT MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Product Management Alliance →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2019–2024), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing