Loading…
Loading…
Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit
CHPA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION (Washington, D.C.) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $3,899,039 in grants to it, the largest being CONSUMER HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION ($3,893,039). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
CHPA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION is better cushioned than half of the 3,678 community improvement nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,678 community improvement nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
104% of CHPA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (60% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
$1.9M from 2 funders in 2018, up from $2.0M and 1 in 2017.
From the IRS filings of CHPA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
CHPA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 100% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
CHPA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Washington, D.C. funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
86% of spending goes to programs.
Operates in 21 states
Part of a family of 1 related entity
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing