Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Consumer Healthcare Products Association

Empower self-care by preserving and expanding choice and availability of consumer healthcare products.

$374k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$5.4MPublic Benefit$257kCrime & Legal$108kEducation$106kEnvironment$86kCommunity Improvement$85kArts & Culture$79kCivil Rights$47kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 17 grants below total $311,542 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $374,191 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $62,649 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $172k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $105k
$11,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION$55,000
COMMUNITY ANTI-DRUG COALITIONS OF AMERICA$50,000
STATE LEGISLATIVE LEADERS FOUNDATION$32,500
ASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION$25,000
ATTORNEY GENERAL ALLIANCE$25,000
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ASSOC EXECUTIVE$21,600
ALLIANCE FOR AGING RESEARCH$15,000
AMERICAN BOTANICAL COUNCIL$11,942
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR PHARMACEUTICAL$11,000
MOUNT VERNON LADIES ASSOCIATION$10,000
ALLIANCE FOR A STRONGER FDA$10,000
NATIONAL DENTAL ASSOCIATION$10,000
DAVID A WINSTON HEALTH POLICY$7,500
THE FOOD & DRUG LAW INSTITUTE$7,500
NATIONAL CONSUMER LEAGUE$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%STATE LEGISLATIVE LEADERS FOUNDATION: $33k → 8%PRODUCT QUALITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $19k → 22%CONFERENCE OF WESTERN ATTORNEYS GENERAL: $25k → 12%PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION: $105k → 17%INFORMA MEDIA INC: $17k → 17%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR PHARMACEUTICAL: $11k → 6%ASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION: $90k → 7%COMMUNITY ANTI-DRUG COALITIONS OF AMERICA: $85k → 9%SAFE KIDS WORLDWIDE: $20k → 8%STATE LEGISLATIVE LEADERS FOUNDATION: $33k → 8%ATTORNEY GENERAL ALLIANCE: $25k → 12%PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION: $75k → 17%STATE LEGISLATIVE LEADERS FOUNDATION: $48k → 14%INFORMA MEDIA INC: $17k → 17%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR PHARMACEUTICAL: $11k → 6%ASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION: $75k → 7%COMMUNITY ANTI-DRUG COALITIONS OF AMERICA: $75k → 9%ASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION: $55k → 11%ATTORNEY GENERAL ALLIANCE: $25k → 12%PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION: $55k → 17%STATE LEGISLATIVE LEADERS FOUNDATION: $35k → 14%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR PHARMACEUTICAL: $11k → 6%ASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $50k → 7%COMMUNITY ANTI DRUG COALITIONS OF AMERICA: $75k → 9%ASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%CONFERENCE OF WESTERN ATTORNEYS GENERAL: $25k → 12%PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION: $35k → 17%AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ASSOC EXECUTIVE: $22k → 14%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR PHARMACEUTICAL: $31k → 6%ASTMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%COMMUNITY ANTI-DRUG COALITIONS OF AMERICA: $60k → 9%ATTORNEY GENERAL ALLIANCE: $25k → 12%CENTER ON ADDICTION: $140k → 17%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR PHARMACEUTICAL: $12k → 6%ASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%COMMUNITY ANTI-DRUG COALITIONS OF AMERICA: $60k → 9%ATTORNEY GENERAL ALLIANCE: $25k → 12%PARTNERSHIP FOR A DRUG FREE AMERICA: $40k → 17%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION: $11k → 6%COMMUNITY ANTI-DRUG COALITIONS OF AMERICA: $50k → 9%PARTNERSHIP FOR A DRUG FREE AMERICA: $25k → 17%COMMUNITY ANTI-DRUG COALITIONS OF AMERICA: $25k → 9%COMMUNITY ANTI-DRUG COALITIONS OF AMERICA: $25k → 9%CHPA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2.0M → 14%CHPA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1.9M → 14%ALLIANCE FOR AGING RESEARCH: $15k → 14%NATIONAL CONSUMER LEAGUE: $12k → 14%PRODUCT MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.0M · 19 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
10

Total granted

$6.0M
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+10%

Still filing today

84%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    CADCA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $455k · revenue +26%
  • PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $410k · revenue +73%
  • AA
    ASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $395k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • PQ
    PRODUCT QUALITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2018 · $19k
  • PM
    PRODUCT MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -75%
  • HA
    HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such…

—
2
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
National Alliance of State Pharmacy Associations Inc

The mission of naspa is to enhance the success of state pharmacy associations in their efforts to advance the profession of pharmacy.

—
5
The National Association of State Workforce Agencies

The national association of state workforce agencies (naswa) mission is to enhance the state workforce agencies' ability to accomplish their goals, statutory roles and responsibilities.

—
6
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
7
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
8
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
9
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
10
National Community Pharmacists Association

Ncpa protects and promotes the interests of independent pharmacists whose current and future success is vital to their patients, their communities, and the entire healthcare system.

—
11
American Association of State Colleges and Universities

Aascu is a washington, d.c. based higher education association that represents the sector of over 500 regional public colleges, universities, and systems whose members share a learning and teaching centered culture, a commitment to…

Education
12
Association for Accessible Medicines

The organization fosters and promotes the interests of the generic pharmaceutical and biosimilars industry.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partnership to End Addiction and the most unlike its peers is Product Management Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Pregnancy Support ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%4%<5yr14%4%5–10yr18%8%10–20yr18%35%20–35yr16%19%35–55yr15%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%8%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%1%10–20yr18%69%20–35yr16%12%35–55yr15%10%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
12%
1,600/12,969

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
18/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHPA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $3,893,039 · Community ImprovementCHPA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION+1 more — $6,500 · Community ImprovementPARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION — $410,000 · HealthPARTNERSHIP T…STATE LEGISLATIVE LEADERS FOUNDATION INC — $157,500 · HealthSTATE LEGISLA…American Botanical Council — $85,742 · HealthAmerican Bota…SAFE KIDS WORLDWIDE — $30,000 · HealthDAVID A WINSTON HEALTH POLICY FELLOWSHIP — $25,500 · Health+4 more — $39,500 · HealthASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $395,000 · OtherASTHMA AND A…Partnership for a Drug-Free America — $65,000 · OtherPartnership …AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ASSOCIATION EXECUTIVES — $51,600 · OtherAMERICAN SOC…INFORMA MEDIA INC — $34,000 · OtherALLIANCE FOR AGING RESEARCH — $25,000 · Other+9 more — $112,000 · Other+9 moreCADCA — $455,000 · Youth DevelopmentConference of Western Attorneys General AG Alliance — $150,000 · EducationAmerican Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education — $97,500 · Education+1 more — $8,250 · EducationNATIONAL CONSUMERS LEAGUE INC — $46,500 · Public BenefitALLIANCE FOR A STRONGER FDA INC — $30,000 · Public BenefitTHE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION — $45,000 · Arts & Culture
Community Improvement$3,899,539Health$748,242Other$682,600Youth Development$455,000Education$255,750Public Benefit$76,500Arts & Culture$45,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHPA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $3,893,039 over 2y, 75% of budgetCADCA — $455,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetPARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION — $410,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $395,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetSTATE LEGISLATIVE LEADERS FOUNDATION INC — $157,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetConference of Western Attorneys General AG Alliance — $150,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education — $97,500 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetAmerican Botanical Council — $85,742 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetPartnership for a Drug-Free America — $65,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF ASSOCIATION EXECUTIVES — $51,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CONSUMERS LEAGUE INC — $46,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION — $45,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR A STRONGER FDA INC — $30,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetSAFE KIDS WORLDWIDE — $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDAVID A WINSTON HEALTH POLICY FELLOWSHIP — $25,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetALLIANCE FOR AGING RESEARCH — $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPRODUCT MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE — $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetTennessee Retail Association — $12,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetHEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES INSTITUTE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL DENTAL ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWomen's Congressional Policy Institute — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMOBILIZE RECOVERY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRODUCT QUALITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $9,500 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetBOARD OF CONTROL FOR SOUTHERN REGIONAL EDUCATION — $8,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD & DRUG LAW INSTITUTE — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTATE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS COUNCIL — $6,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetILLINOIS MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pharmaceutical Resear…Association for Acces…Consumer Brands Assoc…Edison Electric Insti…AARPOpenRoad FoundationAmerican Hotel & Lodg…United States Pharmac…American Fuel and Pet…Ctia - the Wireless A…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of AmericaDC20.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Association for Accessible Medicines · Consumer Brands Association · Edison Electric Institute Inc · AARP · OpenRoad Foundation · American Hotel & Lodging Association · United States Pharmacopeial Convention · American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers · Ctia - the Wireless Association · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Consumer Healthcare Products Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Safe Kids Worldwide — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home