· Public charity
Community Shares of Minnesota
The mission of COMMUNITY SHARES OF MINNESOTA is to create a fair, just and equitable minnesota.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $44,126 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $339,234 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $295,108 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MINNESOTASOUTH DAKOTA | $28,879 |
| ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY OF GOLDEN VALLEYMINNEAPOLIS | $15,247 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2021, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA4× · 2017–2020 · $124k · revenue +1%
- AHAnimal Humane Society5× · 2017–2021 · $123k · revenue +28%
- FMFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC3× · 2018–2020 · $50k · revenue +68%
Funded once
- CRCH ROBINSON EMPLOYEE HARDSHIP FUNDone grant, 2018 · $9k
- CDCAN DO CANINESgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +61%
- WRWILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTAone grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue -2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.
MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
To encourage, promote, support, and elect pro-choice women of all political parties to all levels of public office in minnesota.
Advance the health of individuals and communities through leadership, advocacy and collaboration on behalf of minnesota hospitals and health systems. vision: minnesotans are healthy and have access to the right care at the right time in…
The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.
Trade association whose mission is to empower members to excellence through advocacy, education, expertise, resources and support.
Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.
The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pflag St Paul Minneapolis. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
- Who funds Animal Humane Society ↗
- Who funds GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF STEELE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HENNEPIN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Family Tree Inc ↗
- Who funds Violence Free Minnesota ↗
- Who funds CITY OF LAKES COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds HealthFinders Collaborative Inc ↗
- Who funds Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc ↗
- Who funds CAN DO CANINES ↗
- Who funds WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds ALIGHT ↗
- Who funds NAMI MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds Fresh Air Inc ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA EMERGENCY CARE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds PENUMBRA THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds PFLAG ST PAUL MINNEAPOLIS ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF FARIBAULT INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds CHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds Minnesota Coalition Against Sexual Assault ↗
- Who funds Hawthorne Neighborhood Council ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE RONDO COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Pohlad Family Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Hrk Foundation · Headwaters Foundation for Justice · Fr Bigelow Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Hugh J Andersen Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Shares of Minnesota funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Community Shares of Minnesota?
Find your warmest path to Community Shares of Minnesota through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.