· Public charity
Coalition of Communities of Color
See schedule o.formed in 2001, the COALITION OF COMMUNITIES OF COLOR ("ccc") is an alliance of culturally-specific, community-based organizations with representation from african, african american, asian, latino, native american, pacific islander, and slavic communities of color.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $198,576 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $257,516 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $58,940 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $112k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $73k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE | $72,501 |
| UNITE OREGON | $26,600 |
| SUMA | $25,000 |
| IRCO | $20,000 |
| PORTLAND HARBOR COMMUNITY COALITION | $15,000 |
| VERDE INC | $15,000 |
| LATINO NETWORK | $10,000 |
| VOZ WORKERS RIGHTS EDUCATION PROJECT | $8,000 |
| STREET ROOTS | $6,475 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION3× · 2020–2025 · $54k · revenue +119%- VIVerde Inc2× · 2020–2025 · $43k · revenue +51%
Latino Network2× · 2024–2025 · $42k · revenue +13%
Funded once
NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $28k · revenue +55%- OOPALone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -60%
Community Energy Project Incgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +25%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
In 2024, IAF Pacific continued its work of connecting and strengthening broad-based alliances throughout the Pacific region.Through its Building Partnerships for Collaborative Action initiativethe organization supported Indigenous and…
Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…
Centro cultural promotes education and economic development, increases cultural consciousness, responds to community needs and celebrates understanding among the diverse groups in our community.
The organization collectively works alongside those on the margins to empower individuals and communities through an inclusive range of services and support in east portland.
Earth advantage is focused on advancing a more informed and humane housing market.we work to ensure the us housing market recognizes the elements of homes that create climate risk and values the characteristics of homes that provide (see…
To foster bridges of care, uniting and empowering Black, Indigenous, and Pacific Islander communities in the West Portland Metro Area through education, mentorship, and cultural advocacy.
The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…
Our children oregon's mission is to be a voice and force for the common good for all oregon children, ensuring all children have the resources and opportunities they need to reach their full potential. we elevate data and the voices of…
Develop educational network to communicate historical and scientific information empasizing natural and cultural resources to pacific northwest.
Cairo advocates for and acts to increase equity and social justice through programs, services, and community organizing for immigrant children, youth and families to thrive.
Local Innovation Works supports recovery and resilience in Southern Oregon by supporting and training emerging leaders in values-aligned community organizations. It also hosts public conversations on topics related to the long term…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native American Youth and Family Center and the most unlike its peers is Asian & Pacific Islander Americans Community & Coalition of Oregon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 12% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CAMPBELL INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds Verde Inc ↗
- Who funds Latino Network ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR INTERCULTURAL ORGANIZING ↗
- Who funds Suma ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds OPAL ↗
- Who funds STREET ROOTS INC ↗
- Who funds Community Energy Project Inc ↗
- Who funds Familias en Accion ↗
- Who funds APANO COMMUNITIES UNITED FUND ↗
- Who funds VOZ WORKERS RIGHTS EDUCATION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND HARBOR COMMUNITY COALITION ↗
- Who funds ILLINOIS VALLEY 2010 COMMUNITY RESPONSE TEAM ↗
- Who funds ASIAN & PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICANS COMMUNITY & COALITION OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds CASCADE AIDS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ENERCITY COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds OREGON COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKERS ASSOC ↗
- Who funds SPARK NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INC ↗
- Who funds SELF ENHANCEMENT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Meyer Memorial Trust · The Collins Foundation · Seeding Justice · The Oregon Community Foundation · Careoregon Inc · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · Northwest Health Foundation Fund II · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Worksystems Inc · Onpoint Community Credit Union · Ronald W Naito Md Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Coalition of Communities of Color funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oregon Community Health Workers Assoc — 45% of income from government
- Urban League of Portland Inc — 33% of income from government
- Center for Intercultural Organizing — 28% of income from government
- Native American Youth and Family Center — 23% of income from government
- Latino Network — 15% of income from government
- Self Enhancement Inc — 14% of income from government
- Cascade Aids Project — 13% of income from government
- Voz Workers Rights Education Project — 12% of income from government
- Familias en Accion — 8% of income from government
- The Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization — 4% of income from government
- Verde Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Campbell Institute — 0% of income from government
- Community Energy Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.