Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Worksystems Inc

The mission of the organization is to coordinate a regional workforce system that supports individual prosperity and business competitiveness.

$18M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3.6M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Employment$146MYouth Development$19k
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $53k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $670k
  • $250k+15 grants · $17M
$302,662
Median grant
2
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IRCO$3,606,999
PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE$2,613,189
SE WORKS$1,952,537
POIC$1,620,541
CENTRAL CITY CONCERN$1,202,787
PORTLAND YOUTH BUILDERS$1,094,920
MT HOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,017,213
HUMAN SOLUTIONS$871,462
LATINO NETWORK$857,297
OREGON TRADESWOMEN$444,873
CONSTRUCTING HOPE$353,358
NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH$302,662
THE MENTAL HEALTH & ADDICTION$297,901
URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND$281,004
IMPACT NW$264,795
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION: $207k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION: $137k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION: $97k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION: $90k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION: $84k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION: $80k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION: $59k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION: $23k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION: $11k → 8%OREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORP: $237k → 8%OREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORP: $228k → 8%URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND: $327k → 12%OREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORP: $216k → 8%OREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORP: $196k → 8%URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND: $281k → 12%OREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORP: $174k → 8%URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND: $203k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND: $196k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND: $180k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND: $52k → 12%LUKE-DORF: $10k → 8%SABIN COMM DEVELOP CORP: $8k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF TUALATIN: $5k → 8%FRIENDLY HOUSE INC: $10k → 12%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 12%IMPACT NW: $446k → 12%IMPACT NW: $423k → 12%IMPACT NW: $280k → 12%IMPACT NW: $176k → 12%IMPACT NW: $75k → 12%GROWING GARDENS: $10k → 12%NORTHWEST PILOT PROJECT: $10k → 12%BLACK PARENT INITIATIVE: $124k → 12%BLACK PARENT INITIATIVE: $13k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$145M · 32 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +92% since the first grant, against +51% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
34

Total granted

$145M
$527k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+92%
+51%

Still filing today

81%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $742k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEmploymentCommunity ImprovementEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $27M · revenue +138%
  • SE WORKS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $20M · revenue +9% · 69% of their budget
  • PO
    PORTLAND OPPORTUNITIES INDUST CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $8.9M · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • PP
    PUBLIC POLICY ASSOCIATES
    one grant, 2017 · $97k
  • SU
    SEIU UNITED HEALTHCARE WORKERS WEST AND JOINT EMPLOYER EDUCATION FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $70k · revenue +142%
  • WC
    WILLAMETTE CARPENTER TRAINING CENTER INC
    one grant, 2019 · $61k · revenue -2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cultivate Initiatives

The organization collectively works alongside those on the margins to empower individuals and communities through an inclusive range of services and support in east portland.

Housing & Shelter
2
Welcome Home Coalition

Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…

Community Improvement
3
Weld Seattle
Crime & Legal
4
Community and Shelter Assistance Corp

Rooted in its service to farmworkers, casa of oregon improves the lives of oregonians in underserved communities through building affordable housing, neighborhood facilities and programs that increase families' financial security.

—
5
Housing Oregon

Housing oregon strengthens the collective voice and capacity of mission-driven organizations that share a commitment to housing justice. through our statewide network, we build the affordable housing sector by offering education, resource…

Housing & Shelter
6
Ywca of Greater Portland

To eliminate racism, empower women and promote peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

Human Services
7
Neighborhood Partnerships Inc

See schedule oneighborhood partnerships, inc. (np or the organization) is an oregon non-profit corporation founded in 1989 whose mission is to help create a better oregon, one in which we all have access to opportunity, stability, and what…

Philanthropy
8
Career Path Services Employment and Training

Career path services is a workforce development and human services nonprofit corporation.

Employment
9
Oregon Energy Systems Technology and Research
Environment
10
Neighborhood Economic Develop Corp

Nedco collaboratively builds human capital assets to strengthen neighborhoods and broaden participation in community ownership and governance. nedco is committed to projects that strengthen low-income households and the neighborhoods in…

—
11
Northwest Housing Alternatives

Northwest housing alternatives (nha)s mission is to create opportunity through housing. nha develops, builds, and manages affordable rental housing for families, seniors, and people with disabilities across oregon. these homes help…

Housing & Shelter
12
Lane Workforce Partnership

To meet the workforce needs of employers and individuals through partnerships and innovations in lane county, oregon.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native American Youth and Family Center and the most unlike its peers is Washington County Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Development and Empow…Homeless Services & Crisis …Labor Union LocalsPerforming Arts PresentersDisability Housing & Suppor…Professional & Trade Associ…Asian Faith & Cultural Cent…Pacific Northwest Conservat…Affordable Housing Developm…Black Community Development
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr19%38%20–35yr12%22%35–55yr14%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr19%52%20–35yr12%36%35–55yr14%10%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/72
the rest of the field
13%
1,008/7,890

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/61
Grantees still filing
51/61
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION — $26,864,559 · OtherTHE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONPORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $26,259,484 · OtherPORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGEMHCC — $11,380,434 · OtherMHCCPORTLAND OPPORTUNITIES INDUST CENTER — $8,940,547 · OtherPORTLAND OPPORTUNITIES INDUST CENTERNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC — $2,984,818 · Other+34 more — $5,848,267 · Other+34 moreSE WORKS INC — $20,154,676 · EmploymentSE WORKS INCOregon Tradeswomen Inc — $4,189,640 · EmploymentOregon Tradeswomen In…WORKFORCE INVESTMENT COUNCIL OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY — $2,358,975 · EmploymentWORKFORCE INVESTMENT …+4 more — $373,082 · EmploymentLatino Network — $4,463,515 · Human ServicesIMPACT NW — $2,066,553 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INC — $1,238,082 · Human ServicesOREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,051,299 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION — $787,993 · Human Services+8 more — $199,890 · Human ServicesHUMAN SOLUTIONS INC DBA OUR JUST FUTURE — $8,370,821 · Community ImprovementOregon Manufacturing Extension Partnership Inc — $425,817 · Community Improvement+4 more — $175,677 · Community ImprovementCentral City Concern — $8,369,899 · Health+2 more — $20,000 · HealthPortland YouthBuilders — $5,876,195 · Youth DevelopmentNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER — $273,254 · Youth Development+1 more — $9,919 · Youth DevelopmentSOUTHWEST WASHINGTON WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL — $3,357,780 · Philanthropy
Other$82,278,109Employment$27,076,373Human Services$9,807,332Community Improvement$8,972,315Health$8,389,899Youth Development$6,159,368Philanthropy$3,357,780

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION — $26,864,559 over 9y, 11% of budgetSE WORKS INC — $20,154,676 over 9y, 69% of budgetPORTLAND OPPORTUNITIES INDUST CENTER — $8,940,547 over 9y, 7.9% of budgetHUMAN SOLUTIONS INC DBA OUR JUST FUTURE — $8,370,821 over 9y, 6.3% of budgetCentral City Concern — $8,369,899 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetPortland YouthBuilders — $5,876,195 over 9y, 31% of budgetLatino Network — $4,463,515 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetOregon Tradeswomen Inc — $4,189,640 over 9y, 32% of budgetSOUTHWEST WASHINGTON WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL — $3,357,780 over 9y, 13% of budgetNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC — $2,984,818 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetWORKFORCE INVESTMENT COUNCIL OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY — $2,358,975 over 9y, 16% of budgetIMPACT NW — $2,066,553 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INC — $1,238,082 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetOREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,051,299 over 5y, 6.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION — $787,993 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetConstructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program — $700,029 over 5y, 7.2% of budgetOregon Manufacturing Extension Partnership Inc — $425,817 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetCENTRO CULTURAL OF WASHINGTON COUNTY — $415,563 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetTHE LAUNCHCODE FOUNDATION — $316,757 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetMental Health Association of Oregon — $297,901 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER — $273,254 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetLabors Community Service Agency Inc — $254,519 over 2y, 13% of budgetNECA-IBEW ELECTRICAL TRAINING CENTER — $212,799 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetBlack Parent Initiative — $136,803 over 2y, 12% of budgetLATINOBUILT FOUNDATION — $98,563 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetThe Rosewood Initiative — $86,399 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetDivision Midway Alliance for Community Improvement — $72,798 over 2y, 14% of budgetSEIU UNITED HEALTHCARE WORKERS WEST AND JOINT EMPLOYER EDUCATION FUND — $70,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAll Ages Music Portland dba Friends of Noise — $63,927 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetWILLAMETTE CARPENTER TRAINING CENTER INC — $61,236 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBRIDGES TO CHANGE INC — $59,184 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAIRWAY SCIENCE FOR KIDS INC — $12,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSICKLE CELL ANEMIA FOUNDATION OF OREGON INC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetBIENESTAR INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMetropolitan Family Service — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVOZ WORKERS RIGHTS EDUCATION PROJECT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWest Tuality Habitat for Humanity — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCENTER FOR INTERCULTURAL ORGANIZING — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAPANO COMMUNITIES UNITED FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDLY HOUSE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetProfessional Business Development Group — $10,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetNORTHWEST PILOT PROJECT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVerde Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPathfinders of Oregon — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCASCADE AIDS PROJECT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP FIRE COLUMBIA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMULTICULTURAL INTEGRATED KIDNEY EDUCATION PROGRAM — $10,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds SE WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds PORTLAND OPPORTUNITIES INDUST CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN SOLUTIONS INC DBA OUR JUST FUTURE ↗
  • Who funds Central City Concern ↗
  • Who funds Portland YouthBuilders ↗
  • Who funds Latino Network ↗
  • Who funds Oregon Tradeswomen Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds WORKFORCE INVESTMENT COUNCIL OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT NW ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds OREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds Constructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program ↗
  • Who funds Oregon Manufacturing Extension Partnership Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTRO CULTURAL OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE LAUNCHCODE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mental Health Association of Oregon ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Labors Community Service Agency Inc ↗
  • Who funds NECA-IBEW ELECTRICAL TRAINING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Black Parent Initiative ↗
  • Who funds Trash for Peace ↗
  • Who funds LATINOBUILT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Rosewood Initiative ↗
  • Who funds Division Midway Alliance for Community Improvement ↗
  • Who funds SEIU UNITED HEALTHCARE WORKERS WEST AND JOINT EMPLOYER EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds All Ages Music Portland dba Friends of Noise ↗
  • Who funds WILLAMETTE CARPENTER TRAINING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES TO CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds AIRWAY SCIENCE FOR KIDS INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Collins FoundationMeyer Memorial TrustThe Oregon Community …Careoregon IncOCF Joseph E Weston P…Marie Lamfrom Charita…United Way of the Col…Umpqua Bank Charitabl…Juan Young TrustOnpoint Community Cre…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Hillman Family Founda…
The Collins FoundationOR80.2× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · Careoregon Inc · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · Juan Young Trust · Onpoint Community Credit Union · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Hillman Family Foundations

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Worksystems Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 17%
  • Friends of Trees — 100% of income from government
  • Airway Science for Kids Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Workforce Investment Council of Clackamas County — 87% of income from government
  • Oregon Manufacturing Extension Partnership Inc — 83% of income from government
  • Community Action Organization — 67% of income from government
  • Sickle Cell Anemia Foundation of Oregon Inc — 62% of income from government
  • Pathfinders of Oregon — 57% of income from government
  • Hacienda Community Development Corporation — 48% of income from government
  • Oregon Tradeswomen Inc — 46% of income from government
  • Black Parent Initiative — 45% of income from government
  • Se Works Inc — 43% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association of Oregon — 41% of income from government
  • Bridges to Change Inc — 40% of income from government
  • Oregon Human Development Corporation — 40% of income from government
  • Portland Opportunities Indust Center — 38% of income from government
  • Portland YouthBuilders — 35% of income from government
  • Urban League of Portland Inc — 33% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Family Service — 29% of income from government
  • Center for Intercultural Organizing — 28% of income from government
  • Native American Youth and Family Center — 23% of income from government
  • New Avenues for Youth Inc — 20% of income from government
  • Kairospdx — 19% of income from government
  • Human Solutions Inc Dba Our Just Future — 17% of income from government
  • Latino Network — 15% of income from government
  • Cascade Aids Project — 13% of income from government
  • Voz Workers Rights Education Project — 12% of income from government
  • Central City Concern — 10% of income from government
  • Impact Nw — 8% of income from government
  • Bienestar Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Community Development Corporation of Oregon — 7% of income from government
  • Oregon Solar Energy Education Fund — 7% of income from government
  • New Narrative — 6% of income from government
  • Northwest Pilot Project — 6% of income from government
  • Growing Gardens — 6% of income from government
  • Washington County Historical Society — 4% of income from government
  • The Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization — 4% of income from government
  • Girls Inc of the Pacific Northwest — 4% of income from government
  • The Rosewood Initiative — 3% of income from government
  • Verde Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Friendly House Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Constructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program — 2% of income from government
  • Trash for Peace — 2% of income from government
  • Rose Community Development Corporat — 1% of income from government
  • Latinobuilt Foundation — 1% of income from government
  • All Ages Music Portland dba Friends of Noise — 1% of income from government
  • Centro Cultural of Washington County — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
7rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines