Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Clermont Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$458k
Granted FY2024still arriving
40
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

International$759kEducation$637kReligion$487kHealth$391kEmployment$253kEnvironment$194kPhilanthropy$179kHuman Services$133kOther$0
02FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $84k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $324k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$8,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$8.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HBS - HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL$50,000
BOZEMAN DHARMA CENTER$45,000
DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION$35,000
FRIENDS OF MATENWA$35,000
LOOP LAB$32,000
PROCTOR ACADEMY$20,000
ORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
COMUNIDAD CONNECT$20,000
ORCAS COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER$20,000
MESSENGERS FOR HEALTH$17,000
FRIENDS OF THE OLGA STORE BUILDING$10,000
MAYO FOUNDATION$10,000
UNICEF$10,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$10,000
CROSSCUT MOUNTAIN SPORTS CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $421k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $5k → 22%GUADALUPE CENTER: $1k → 10%ORCAS COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $20k → 10%HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL (HRDC) OF DISTRICT IX INC: $5k → 10%WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME: $10k → 14%ORCAS COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $15k → 10%ORCAS COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $15k → 10%HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL (HRDC) OF DISTRICT IX INC: $3k → 10%ORCAS COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 10%PINE STREET INN: $500 → 16%LEXINGTON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 8%FRIENDS OF MATENWA: $50k → 8%LEXINGTON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $17k → 8%ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $650 → 16%FRIENDS OF MATENWA: $40k → 8%ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $500 → 16%LEXINGTON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 8%FRIENDS OF MATENWA: $40k → 8%LEXINGTON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $14k → 8%FRIENDS OF MATENWA: $40k → 8%FRIENDS OF MATENWA: $35k → 8%FRIENDS OF MATENWA: $35k → 8%FRIENDS OF MATENWA: $10k → 8%FRIENDS OF MATENWA: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
WY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.3M · 98 repeat orgs$279k to everyone else

98 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2024, 62 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

98
44

Total granted

$3.3M
$229k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+42%

Still filing today

62%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MATENWA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $260k · revenue +56%
  • TL
    THE LOOP LAB INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $197k · revenue +817%
  • GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $145k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • CC
    CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • GN
    Global Network Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -11%
  • PO
    PARISH OF ST MATTHEWS
    one grant, 2023 · $21k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
5
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
6
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
7
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
8
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
10
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
11
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
12
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Compassion Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Independent K-12 SchoolsPolicy Research and AdvocacyHealth Access Advocacy and …Pregnancy Support ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesCommunity Food PantriesPublic Library OperationsCommunity College Foundatio…Domestic Violence ServicesLocal History MuseumsEnvironmental Conservation …Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Cancer Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Sports ProgramsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%34%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%33%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/102
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,463

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

90 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 90 of the 146 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
89/90
Grantees still filing
75/90
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SHALLOWFORD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $112,000 · OtherSHALLOWFORD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHAgnes Scott College — $80,198 · OtherMAYO FOUNDATION — $71,000 · OtherBLACK VOTERS MATTER — $60,000 · OtherORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $80,000 · OtherMONTANA RACIAL EQUITY PROJECT — $65,000 · OtherCROSSCUT MOUNTAIN SPORTS CENTER — $62,000 · Other+89 more — $1,216,958 · Other+89 moreVILLAGE HEALTH WORKS — $116,000 · InternationalVILLAGE HEALTH W…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $84,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FR…International Rescue Committee INC — $71,000 · InternationalInternational Re…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $56,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FU…DIRECT RELIEF — $56,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFOXFAM-AMERICA INC — $53,000 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA IN…Save The Children Federation Inc — $52,000 · InternationalSave The Childre…Comunidad Connect — $31,000 · InternationalComunidad Connec…+5 more — $20,250 · InternationalFRIENDS OF MATENWA INC — $259,530 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF MA…LEXINGTON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $76,000 · Human ServicesLEXINGTON YOU…ORCAS COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $60,000 · Human ServicesORCAS COMMUNI…+7 more — $34,650 · Human Services+7 moreGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC — $144,500 · EducationGEORGIA TEC…PROCTOR ACADEMY — $60,000 · EducationPROCTOR ACA…BARTON COLLEGE — $48,000 · EducationBARTON COLL…THE LOOMIS INSTITUTE D/B/A THE LOOMIS CHAFFEE SCHOOL — $41,000 · EducationTHE LOOMIS …Sigma Chi Foundation — $35,000 · EducationSigma Chi F…Trustees of Tufts College — $25,000 · EducationTrustees of…+6 more — $24,400 · Education+6 moreBOZEMAN DHARMA CENTER — $209,000 · Religion+3 more — $9,300 · ReligionTHE LOOP LAB INC — $197,000 · EmploymentEARTHJUSTICE — $70,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $42,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $24,000 · EnvironmentCHATTOOGA CONSERVANCY — $14,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL — $9,000 · EnvironmentWOMEN'S VOICES FOR THE EARTH — $9,000 · EnvironmentTHE SAN JUAN PRESERVATION TRUST — $7,500 · Environment+3 more — $12,000 · Environment
Other$1,747,156International$539,250Human Services$430,180Education$377,900Religion$218,300Employment$197,000Environment$187,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF MATENWA INC — $259,530 over 8y, 6.5% of budgetBOZEMAN DHARMA CENTER — $209,000 over 8y, 22% of budgetTHE LOOP LAB INC — $197,000 over 6y, 19% of budgetGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC — $144,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVILLAGE HEALTH WORKS — $116,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $84,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAgnes Scott College — $80,198 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $71,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE — $70,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMONTANA RACIAL EQUITY PROJECT — $65,000 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetCROSSCUT MOUNTAIN SPORTS CENTER — $62,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetPROCTOR ACADEMY — $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetORCAS COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $60,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $56,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $56,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMUCH MINISTRIES INC — $54,580 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC — $53,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $52,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBARTON COLLEGE — $48,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $47,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $42,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOOMIS INSTITUTE D/B/A THE LOOMIS CHAFFEE SCHOOL — $41,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHAVEN — $38,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSigma Chi Foundation — $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP — $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetComunidad Connect — $31,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetMESSENGERS FOR HEALTH — $27,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $25,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Network Foundation Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $24,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE OLGA STORE BUILDING — $20,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetGREATER GALLATIN UNITED WAY INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOPAL COMMUNITY LAND TRUST — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHANDEL AND HAYDN SOCIETY — $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBIG SKY YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROJECT INC — $14,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCHATTOOGA CONSERVANCY — $14,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR — $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWENDELL HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $11,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeta Psi Foundation Inc — $9,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetNATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL — $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S VOICES FOR THE EARTH — $9,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONTANA ABORTION ACCESS PROGRAM — $7,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MATENWA INC ↗
  • Who funds BOZEMAN DHARMA CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE LOOP LAB INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE HEALTH WORKS ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Agnes Scott College ↗
  • Who funds ORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LEXINGTON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA RACIAL EQUITY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds CROSSCUT MOUNTAIN SPORTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PROCTOR ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds ORCAS COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds MUCH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BARTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE LOOMIS INSTITUTE D/B/A THE LOOMIS CHAFFEE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds Sigma Chi Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Montana Community Fou…One Valley Community …The Rieschel Foundati…The GreerSolien FundBoston Foundation IncSeattle FoundationBESS Family FoundationYellowstone Club Comm…Glasser Family FundDonald Family Foundat…Seattle-Sonoran Found…Greater Gallatin Unit…
Montana Community Foundation IncMT20.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Montana Community Foundation Inc · One Valley Community Foundation · The Rieschel Foundation · The GreerSolien Fund · Boston Foundation Inc · Seattle Foundation · BESS Family Foundation · Yellowstone Club Community Foundation · Glasser Family Fund · Donald Family Foundation · Seattle-Sonoran Foundation · Greater Gallatin United Way Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Clermont Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Saint Francis House Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Handel and Haydn Society — 2% of income from government
  • Lexington Historical Society — 1% of income from government
  • Boston Ballet Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 146 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines