· Private foundation
Donald Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k29 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $96k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SEADOC SOCIETY | $25,500 |
| RECOVERY CAFE | $25,000 |
| FUNHOUSE COMMONS | $25,000 |
| SEADOC SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| UW MEDICINE ADVANCEMENT | $10,000 |
| SAN JUAN PRESERVATION TRUST | $7,000 |
| UPLIFT | $5,000 |
| OPAL COMMUNITY LAND TRUST | $5,000 |
| A GIVING HEART | $2,500 |
| ORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| OVERFLOW 912 | $2,000 |
| RAINIER SCHOLARS | $1,000 |
| FRED HUTCH CANCER CENTER | $1,000 |
| KCSARC | $1,000 |
| SEATTLE ACADEMY | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
51 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RCRECOVERY CAFE9× · 2017–2025 · $236k · revenue +254%
- PHPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES8× · 2018–2025 · $140k · revenue +108%
- OCOPAL COMMUNITY LAND TRUST9× · 2017–2025 · $109k · revenue +226%
Funded once
- UDUC DAVIS (SEADOC SOCIETY)one grant, 2024 · $36k
- OSOCS SUPPORTING FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +6%
- CJCOLLECTIVE JUSTICEFISCAL AGENT RAINIER VALLEY CORPSone grant, 2023 · $11k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.
Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.
To restore habitat, water quality and native species in the puget sound
Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.
Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…
Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences educates and trains health care professionals emphasizing service among rural and medically under-served communities throughout the Northwest.
We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.
Artist Trust supports the livelihoods of artists working in all disciplines to create a more vibrant and equitable Washington State.
The Seattle Architecture Foundation connects people to the architecture, design, and history of Seattle. We believe the more you engage with design, the more you feel connected to your changing city. As a volunteer driven organization, we…
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
The primary goal is to help children & adults develop a commitment to lifelong learning & environmental and community stewardship through hands-on learning experiences combining science, technology, & the arts at islandwood's 255-acre…
Creating access, excellence and success for the peninsula college community by providing funds for students and programs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Overflow 912. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SEATTLE COLLEGES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RECOVERY CAFE ↗
- Who funds PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES ↗
- Who funds ORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPAL COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ORCAS ISLAND FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE SAN JUAN PRESERVATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Health Center Foundation ↗
- Who funds UPLIFT NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds OCS SUPPORTING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ORCAS ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CHARLES & EMMA FRYE FREE PUBLIC ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds TEENS IN PUBLIC SERVICE ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LAKESIDE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center ↗
- Who funds RECLAIM ↗
- Who funds ENGEYE INC ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE THEATRE GROUP ↗
- Who funds SENIORS IN SERVICE OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds Seattle Children's Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Orcas Island Community Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Wyman Youth Trust · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Orcas Bay Foundation · Sos Foundation · Janet Wright Ketcham Foundation · Whatley Foundation · The GreerSolien Fund · Satya and Rao Remala Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Donald Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Seniors in Service of Tampa Bay Inc — 48% of income from government
- Ac Portland — 14% of income from government
- Wesleyan University — 1% of income from government
- Monmouth University Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.