How much did GREATER GALLATIN UNITED WAY INC grant in FY2024?

GREATER GALLATIN UNITED WAY INC reported 19 grants totaling $350,994 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is GREATER GALLATIN UNITED WAY INC based?

GREATER GALLATIN UNITED WAY INC is based in MT.

GREATER GALLATIN UNITED WAY INC

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

GREATER GALLATIN UNITED WAY INC

Greater Gallatin United Way envisions local communities where all individuals and families achieve their full potential through education, income stability, and healthy living.

$351k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$50k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 56% of GREATER GALLATIN UNITED WAY INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

friendshipbelgradechildlivesaddressinghungertransportation

2020

food basicbasic financialshelterhousingsenior nutritionnutrition healthhealth recreation

2021

covid reliefbridger foothilsfoothils firefire reliefsheltermentalhousing

2022

stevens youthsurvivor prevprev abuseafter

2023

covid reliefstevens youthmentalwellbeingactivitiesprevafter

2024

youth successhealth welldisaster victimvictim allocationsearly learningbasic

2025

health wellyouth successbasicreachhousingsolutions

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k8 grants · $63k
$10k–50k10 grants · $100k
$50k–250k1 grant · $50k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.4M

Total assets

Largest grants

HELP CENTER$50,000
WELLNESS IN ACTION$10,000
BEFRIENDERS$10,000
STEVENS YOUTH CENTER$10,000
HAVEN$10,000
COOKE CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERC$10,000
THRIVE$10,000
LIVINGSTON LINKS FOR LEARNING$10,000
CHILD CARE CONNECTIONS$10,000
SUFFER OUT LOUD$10,000
LITTLE RANGERS LEARNING CENT$10,000
GREATER IMPACT$9,000
PARK LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORP$8,798
GALLATIN COUNTY CASAGAL PROG$8,000
MONTANA MINDFULNESS$8,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $948k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.8M · 32 repeat orgs$393k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +84% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.8M

$374k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%

+1%

Still filing today

59%

42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesReligionCrime & LegalPhilanthropyArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

HC
HELP CENTER
7× · 2018–2024 · $381k · revenue +592%
HW
HRDC WARMING CNTR PARK COUNTY
4× · 2018–2021 · $298k · revenue +88%
H
HAVEN
7× · 2018–2024 · $130k · revenue +84%

Funded once

M
MIJA
one grant, 2021 · $69k
RD
RURAL DYNAMICS INC
one grant, 2018 · $53k · revenue -40%
GC
GALLATIN CITYCTY HEALTH DEPT
one grant, 2021 · $35k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Glendive Medical Center

Committed to caring, healing, and a healthier community through the procurement of health services.

Health

Gallatin Watershed Council Inc

The Gallatin Watershed Council guides collaborative watershed stewardship in the Gallatin Valley for a healthy and productive landscape.

Environment

Action for Eastern Montana

Action for Eastern Montana is committed to strengthening and enhancing the quality of life within the communities we serve by promoting education, advocacy and dignity for achieving independence.

Human Services

South Central Montana Regional Mental

Mental health and chemical dependency services

—

Northeast Montana Health Services

To deliver quality, cost-effective health care to the communities that we serve for improvement of human life.

Health

Montana Budget and Policy Center

To advance responsible tax, budget, and economic policies through credible research and analysis in order to promote opportunity and fairness for all Montanans.

Public Benefit

Bozeman Health Deaconess Hospital

To improve community health and quality of life for residents and visitors of Southwest Montana.

Health

Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care

Health

Central Montana Childcare Alliance

Partner with childcare providers, families, and stakeholders to improve the quality of programming and expand the availability of childcare options in central montana.

Human Services

Bozeman Art Museum

To inspire and foster creativity and a love of art through diverse and high quality exhibits programs classes and lectures.

Arts & Culture

Montanas Peer Network

Montana's Peer Network is a statewide peer run 501(c)3 non-profit recovery organization with a mission to lead the expansion and development of recovery-oriented behavioral health services in Montana.

Health

Gallatin Valley Foundation for Economic

The foundation works to strengthen the economy of gallatin county, montana through local business development activities in an effort to attract, retain and grow jobs and businesses throughout gallatin county.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Gallatin Valley Inc and the most unlike its peers is Compassion Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

4%2/52

the rest of the field

76/1,035

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

34 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

30/34

Grantees still filing

24/34

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,813,540Human Services$998,991Religion$156,966Crime & Legal$74,000Youth Development$49,000Civil Rights$39,673Philanthropy$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

One Valley Community FoundationMT39.6× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: One Valley Community Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Yellowstone Club Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · Bozeman Deaconess Health Services · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · First Security Bank Foundation · Treacy Foundation · Park County Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation GREATER GALLATIN UNITED WAY INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: COMMUNITY MEDIATION CENTER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 810511666 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on COMMUNITY MEDIATION CENTER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 31% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Greater Gallatin United Way Inc?

Find your warmest path to Greater Gallatin United Way Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

GREATER GALLATIN UNITED WAY INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

34 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Greater Gallatin United Way Inc?

More from the funding graph

GREATER GALLATIN UNITED WAY INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

34 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Greater Gallatin United Way Inc?

More from the funding graph