· Public charity
Civic Works Inc
Strengthening baltimore's communities through education, skills development and community service.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $289k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $203k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OUTCAST FOOD NETWORK | $52,500 |
| PARITY BALTIMORE INC | $50,550 |
| CASA INC | $50,000 |
| PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT & RESEARCH CENTER | $50,000 |
| PLEASANT HOUSING | $48,558 |
| CLAY POTS | $48,332 |
| NEW VISION HOUSE OF HOPE INC | $27,500 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS | $27,500 |
| MARYLAND PHYSICIANS CARE | $27,436 |
| BALTIMORE HEALTHY START INC | $25,000 |
| DOWNTOWN BALTIMORE FAMILY ALLIANCE | $25,000 |
| MEN AND FAMILIES CENTER | $24,984 |
| SOAP RECOVERY SUPPORT & MORE | $24,661 |
| MOVEABLE FEAST INC | $10,000 |
| LAMB INC | $5,022 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $178k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $198k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MOMEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLANDINC5× · 2017–2024 · $558k · revenue +108%
- BNBANNER NEIGHBORHOODS COMMUNITY CORP3× · 2017–2021 · $453k · revenue +52%
- LHLIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC2× · 2018–2021 · $364k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- KCKESWICK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INCone grant, 2021 · $183k · revenue 0%
- GMGRACE MEDICAL CENTER INCone grant, 2023 · $130k · revenue -10%
- SHSINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $88k · revenue +35%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Community based nonprofit organization
Assist community members in capacity building, program development, fiscal sponsorship and organizational development for the general improvement in quality of life plus green space and community organiz.
To advocate fair housing and improving tenant/landlord relations.
To help baltimore communities forge strong connections among neighbors to market their communities, increase home values and create high standards for property improvement. using its capacity to attract and invest public and private…
Nonprofit community based organization that works to foster an enviornment where residents, business owners,and stateholders feel confident to invest their time,energy,and money. we are a healthy neighborhoods and baltimore main streets…
To cultivate career advancement opportunities for local talent, facilitate talent acquisition for local employers, increase access to capital for local entrepreneurs' social ventures, and foster cross-sector collaboration to address city…
Health care for the homeless works to end homelessness through racially equitable health care, housing and advocacy in partnership with those of us who have experienced it.
The corporation will develop sustainable neighborhood economies in depressed areas by: igniting interest in sustainable social enterprise, helping individuals transform challenges into opportunities, creating sustainable social…
Develop and manage affordable housing for low-income individuals and families in baltimore city who are affected by psychiatric disabilities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Charm City Care Connection Inc and the most unlike its peers is Liberty Grace of God. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLANDINC ↗
- Who funds BANNER NEIGHBORHOODS COMMUNITY CORP ↗
- Who funds LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds ST AMBROSE HOUSING AID CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds KESWICK MULTI-CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Outcast Food Network ↗
- Who funds KESWICK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds GRACE MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds PARITY BALTIMORE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds New Vision House of Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds PLEASANT HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds GREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC ↗
- Who funds STRONG CITY BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds ST FRANCIS NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER ↗
- Who funds Professional Development and Research Center International ↗
- Who funds CASA INC ↗
- Who funds CLAY POTS INC ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN BALTIMORE FAMILY ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds MEN AND FAMILIES CENTER ↗
- Who funds FUSION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds MOVEABLE FEAST INC ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ACTION IN MATURITY INC ↗
- Who funds ICARRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE HEALTHY START INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Unity Properties Inc ↗
- Who funds DIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MANNA HOUSE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Baltimore Civic Fund Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · West Baltimore Renaissance Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Foundation · The Morris Goldseker Foundation of Maryland Inc · Alliance for Open Society Int'L Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Civic Works Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Green & Healthy Homes Initiative Inc — 100% of income from government
- Baltimore Urban League Inc — 100% of income from government
- Muslim Social Services Agency — 65% of income from government
- New Vision House of Hope Inc — 63% of income from government
- Southwest Partnership Inc — 50% of income from government
- The Pride Center of Maryland Inc — 49% of income from government
- Baltimore Healthy Start Inc — 43% of income from government
- Southeast Community Development Corporation Inc — 35% of income from government
- Neighborhood Housing Services of Baltimore Inc — 22% of income from government
- Moveable Feast Inc — 18% of income from government
- Bridging Hope Inc — 16% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Parity Baltimore Incorporated — 11% of income from government
- Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
- Banner Neighborhoods Community Corp — 6% of income from government
- Rebuild Metro Inc — 5% of income from government
- Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
- Digital Harbor Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Franciscan Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- The United Way of Central Maryland Inc — 2% of income from government
- Lifebridge Health Inc — 1% of income from government
- Sinai Hospital of Baltimore Inc — 0% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.