· Public charity
Baltimore Civic Fund Inc
The baltimore civic fund works to connect government and philanthropy to improve residents' quality of life.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $102k
- $10k–50k22 grants · $422k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $461k
- $250k+2 grants · $897k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CIVIC WORKS | $612,786 |
| BON SECOURS COMMUNITY WORKS | $284,518 |
| BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS SYSTE | $80,022 |
| PASS IT ON INC | $68,475 |
| DENT EDUCATION INC | $62,161 |
| LET'S GO BOYS AND GIRLS | $50,000 |
| A PROSPEROUS TOMORROW | $50,000 |
| NPOWER INC | $50,000 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| OPEN WORKS | $50,000 |
| LET'S THRIVE BALTIMORE INC | $46,710 |
| MIDTOWN COMMUNITY FUND INC | $37,500 |
| NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC | $37,363 |
| BALTIMORE GREEN SPACE | $36,230 |
| GRANTS UNDER 5000 | $30,781 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $653k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BSBon Secours Baltimore Community Works Inc3× · 2023–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +44%
- BEBroadway East CDC2× · 2023–2024 · $662k · revenue +14% · 42% of their budget
- PHPARK HEIGHTS RENAISSANCE INC2× · 2023–2024 · $646k · revenue +79%
Funded once
- LRLAZARUS RITEone grant, 2023 · $414k
- GLGRANTS LES THAN 5000one grant, 2023 · $118k
- MPMARYLAND PHILANTHROPY NETWORKone grant, 2023 · $111k · revenue +22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To cultivate career advancement opportunities for local talent, facilitate talent acquisition for local employers, increase access to capital for local entrepreneurs' social ventures, and foster cross-sector collaboration to address city…
To advocate fair housing and improving tenant/landlord relations.
Greater Baltimore Committee, Inc. is a not-for-profit, civic-interest corporation comprised of business and professional organizations located within the Greater Baltimore Area. Its purpose is to provide a strong, unified and effective…
The baltimore development corporation (bdc) is a non-profit organization that serves as the economic development agency for the city of baltimore. bdc's mission is to grow the city's economy in an inclusive, equitable manner by retaining,…
To promote, strengthen, and advocate for the community development sector throughout Marylands urban, suburban, and rural communities.
The council was organized for the purpose of providing its members with adequate representation in various union related matters.
The corporation will develop sustainable neighborhood economies in depressed areas by: igniting interest in sustainable social enterprise, helping individuals transform challenges into opportunities, creating sustainable social…
Live baltimores mission is to recruit and retain baltimore city residents.
The mission of baltimore community lending is supporting the revitalization and strengthening of underserved communities in the greater baltimore region through innovative financial solutions and collaborative resources designed to promote…
To foster a transformative community of tech-savvy, innovative, entrepenurial people looking for creative collaboration to accelerate their growth potential and make powerful economic impact on the City of Baltimore and beyond.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Belair-Edison Neighborhoods Inc and the most unlike its peers is Make Space. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 22. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
155 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 155 of the 384 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CIVIC WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds Bon Secours Baltimore Community Works Inc ↗
- Who funds Broadway East CDC ↗
- Who funds PARK HEIGHTS RENAISSANCE INC ↗
- Who funds LAZARUS RITE ↗
- Who funds WESTPORT COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FUSION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds ABORTION FUND OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND PHILANTHROPY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds CASH CAMPAIGN OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds LETS THRIVE BALTIMORE ↗
- Who funds BMORE EMPOWERED INC ↗
- Who funds PASS IT ON INC ↗
- Who funds Tuerk House Inc ↗
- Who funds DENT EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds Unity Properties Inc ↗
- Who funds INTERSECTION OF CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds HOMELESS PERSONS REPRESENTATION PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds WAVERLY MAIN STREET INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds PATTERSON PARK PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE MONTESSORI INC ↗
- Who funds Baltimore International Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds BELAIR-EDISON NEIGHBORHOODS INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER STAGE ASSOCIATES INC ↗
- Who funds OHR CHADASH CONGREGATION INC DBA OHR CHADASH ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds IMENTOR INC ↗
- Who funds THE BALTIMORE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE SHAKESPEARE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds FRANCISCAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND CONSUMER RIGHTS COALITION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Abell Foundation Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Foundation · The Morris Goldseker Foundation of Maryland Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Family League of Baltimore City Inc · Lockhart Vaughan Foundation · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · The Bunting Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Baltimore Civic Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Druid Heights Community Development Corporation — 100% of income from government
- Upton Planning Committee Inc — 100% of income from government
- Pass It On Inc — 100% of income from government
- Fells Point Main Street Inc — 100% of income from government
- Open Works Inc — 96% of income from government
- Midtown Community Fund Inc — 73% of income from government
- International Social Service United States of America Branch Inc — 72% of income from government
- Civic Works Inc — 63% of income from government
- Hamilton-Lauraville Main Street Inc — 59% of income from government
- Southwest Partnership Inc — 50% of income from government
- Federal Hill Main Street Inc — 37% of income from government
- Southeast Community Development Corporation Inc — 35% of income from government
- The Baltimore Children's Museum Inc — 33% of income from government
- Belair-Edison Neighborhoods Inc — 32% of income from government
- Govans Ecumenical Development Corp — 28% of income from government
- Asylee Women Enterprise Inc — 26% of income from government
- Baltimore Bar Foundation Inc — 23% of income from government
- Neighborhood Housing Services of Baltimore Inc — 22% of income from government
- Intersection of Change Inc — 20% of income from government
- The House of Ruth Maryland Inc — 19% of income from government
- Chesapeake Shakespeare Company — 16% of income from government
- Everyman Theatre Inc — 15% of income from government
- Neighborhood Design Center Inc — 14% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Thread Inc — 12% of income from government
- Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc — 11% of income from government
- Cash Campaign of Maryland Inc — 11% of income from government
- Park Heights Renaissance Inc — 10% of income from government
- The Peale Center for Baltimore History and Architecture Inc — 8% of income from government
- Pro Bono Counseling Project Inc — 8% of income from government
- Maryland New Directions Inc — 8% of income from government
- Baltimore Medical System Inc — 8% of income from government
- Living Classrooms Foundation — 7% of income from government
- 4MyCity Inc — 7% of income from government
- Center Stage Associates Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Producers Club of Md Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Village Learning Place Inc — 6% of income from government
- Public Justice Center Inc — 5% of income from government
- Baltimore Museum of Art — 4% of income from government
- Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
- Bon Secours Baltimore Community Works Inc — 3% of income from government
- Leaders of Tomorrow Youth Center Inc — 3% of income from government
- Digital Harbor Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Franciscan Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Humanim Inc — 1% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Maryland Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.