Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Alliance for Open Society Int'L Inc

Alliance for open society international, inc.

$15M
Granted FY2021
53
Grants FY2021
5
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Alliance for Open Society Int'L Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to New Venture Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Alliance for Open Society Int'L Inc named its own grantees at scale: 53 organizations, $11M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’20
53
’21
62
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Philanthropy$13MHuman Services$4.1MHealth$4.0MEducation$3.2MCrime & Legal$2.7MCommunity Improvement$2.4MEmployment$1.7MInternational$1.3MOther$0
02FY2021 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 53 grants below total $11,231,864 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $15,205,179 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,973,315 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $255k
  • $50k–250k32 grants · $2.9M
  • $250k+12 grants · $8.1M
$93,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC$1,172,000
FUSION PARTNERSHIPS INC$926,000
URBAN STRATEGIES INC$892,000
ELEV8 BALTIMORE INC$825,000
CASA DE MARYLAND$765,000
BANNER NEIGHBORHOODS COMMUNITY CORPORATION$685,000
JOB OPPORTUNITIES TASK FORCE INC$565,000
FUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE$540,000
CITY OF REFUGE BALTIMORE$485,000
ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC$485,000
BON SECOURS OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC DBA BON S$485,000
BALTIMORE CORPS INC$275,000
MARYLAND PHILANTHROPY NETWORK$239,000
NATIONAL COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND DRUG DEPENDENCE$170,000
CENTER FOR WORKFORCE INCLUSION$150,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $5.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%URBAN STRATEGIES INC: $892k → 21%THE BLACK MALE YOGA INITIATIVE INC: $50k → 6%CITY OF REFUGE BALTIMORE: $485k → 6%CENTER FOR WORKFORCE INCLUSION: $250k → 8%CENTER FOR WORKFORCE INCLUSION: $150k → 8%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL MARYLA: $60k → 11%THE MOVEMENT TEAM: $50k → 19%MANDALA ENTERPRISE CORPORATION: $125k → 11%DANIEL CARL TORSCH FOUNDATION: $75k → 11%DANIEL CARL TORSCH FOUNDATION: $70k → 11%BALTIMORE ACTION LEGAL TEAM: $250k → 19%CENTER FOR CHILDREN'S LAW AND POLICY: $93k → 14%POWER INSIDE INC: $150k → 19%POWER INSIDE INC: $50k → 19%TURNAROUND TUESDAY INC: $50k → 19%BON SECOURS OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC DBA BON S: $485k → 19%LIGHT OF TRUTH CENTER INC: $160k → 19%LIGHT OF TRUTH CENTER INC: $100k → 19%LIGHT OF TRUTH CENTER INC: $75k → 19%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC: $1.2M → 19%BALTIMORE SAFE HAVEN: $150k → 19%BALTIMORE SAFE HAVEN: $140k → 19%YOUTH EMPOWERED SOCIETY: $75k → 19%FRANCISCAN CENTER INC: $50k → 19%YOUTH EMPOWERED SOCIETY: $50k → 19%ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $485k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
MD
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 32% of Alliance for Open Society Int'L Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 5% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 1% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Alliance for Open Society Int'L Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.2% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 28 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.

28 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 62 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
2

Total granted

$12M
$175k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+42%

Still filing today

93%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23
Human ServicesEducationHealthCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CASA INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +54%
  • MP
    MARYLAND PHILANTHROPY NETWORK
    3× · 2021–2023 · $914k · revenue +46%
  • E
    ELEV8BALTIMOREINC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $850k · revenue +785% · 81% of their budget

Funded once

  • SC
    STRONG CITY BALTIMORE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $110k · revenue +42%
  • BF
    BALTIMOREANS FOR TRANSPARENT AND ACCOUNTABLE LAW E
    one grant, 2020 · $65k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asylee Women Enterprise Inc

Asylee Women Enterprise (AWE), journeys with asylum seekers and other forced migrants as they navigate the immigration legal process, begin to heal from past trauma, and rebuild their lives in Baltimore.

International
2
Community Mediation Program Inc

To provide free mediation services in the baltimore metropolitan area for the purposes of reducing interpersonal and community violence. the program also provides community education and conflict resolution training.

Human Services
3
Metropolitan Baltimore Council of Afl-Cio Unions

The council was organized for the purpose of providing its members with adequate representation in various union related matters.

—
4
District of Columbia Access to Justice

Work with DC courts, private bar & legal services providers to increase legal representations for low & moderate income DC residents, enhance efficiency of legal services, and reduce barriers to the judicial system.

Crime & Legal
5
Maryland Black Caucus Foundati

To educate the community on the adverse conditions under which they are living and propose various methods of alleviating conditions by conducting public forums and publishing studies.

—
6
Maryland New Directions Inc

Maryland new directions' mission is to train and coach people facing career and life transitions to overcome barriers, restore self-belief, and acquire the skills and tools needed to secure employment on a path to a living wage.

Health
7
Community Mediation Maryland Inc

To advance community mediation in Maryland through educating the public, providing training and quality assurance, conducting research and creatively applying mediation to social challenges.

Crime & Legal
8
Greater Baybrook Alliance Inc

Greater Baybrook Alliance GBA is a non-profit community development organization whose mission is to act as a catalyst and conduit for equitable development and reinvestment in the Brooklyn, Brooklyn Park, Curtis Bay neighborhoods and…

Community Improvement
9
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
10
Community Development Network of Maryland Inc

To promote, strengthen, and advocate for the community development sector throughout Marylands urban, suburban, and rural communities.

Community Improvement
11
Civil Justice Inc

Civil justice is a non-profit organization dedicated to expanding legal services for low and moderate-income marylanders facing life-altering legal issues, using innovative solutions that create positive change.

Crime & Legal
12
Greater Baltimore Committee Inc

Greater Baltimore Committee, Inc. is a not-for-profit, civic-interest corporation comprised of business and professional organizations located within the Greater Baltimore Area. Its purpose is to provide a strong, unified and effective…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baltimore Harm Reduction Coalition Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Movement Team. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 17. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%14%<5yr15%17%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr18%20%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr15%6%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%6%<5yr15%9%5–10yr19%45%10–20yr18%20%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr15%3%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
5%
5/109
the rest of the field
13%
6,646/51,056

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

102 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

12
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
97/102
Grantees still filing
60/102
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEW VENTURE FUND — $11,847,562 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUNDCENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC — $1,172,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR URBAN F…URBAN STRATEGIES INC — $892,000 · Human ServicesURBAN STRATEGIES I…CITY OF REFUGE BALTIMORE INC — $485,000 · Human ServicesCITY OF REFUGE BAL…ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $485,000 · Human ServicesASSOCIATED CATHOLI…Bon Secours Baltimore Community Works Inc — $485,000 · Human ServicesBon Secours Baltim…CWI WORKS INC — $400,000 · Human ServicesCWI WORKS INCLIGHT OF TRUTH CENTER INC — $335,000 · Human ServicesLIGHT OF TRUTH CEN…Baltimore Safe Haven Corp — $290,000 · Human ServicesBaltimore Action Legal Team Inc — $250,000 · Human ServicesPOWER INSIDE INC — $200,000 · Human Services+9 more — $748,000 · Human Services+9 moreFUSION PARTNERSHIP INC — $2,186,000 · Community ImprovementFUSION PART…BANNER NEIGHBORHOODS COMMUNITY CORP — $710,000 · Community ImprovementBANNER NEIG…NO BOUNDARIES COALITION INC — $410,000 · Community ImprovementNO BOUNDARI…BUSINESS VOLUNTEERS MARYLAND INC — $220,000 · Community ImprovementBUSINESS VO…Shes Well Networked Inc — $175,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $40,000 · Community ImprovementCASA INC — $1,015,000 · OtherCASA INCMARYLAND PHILANTHROPY NETWORK — $914,000 · OtherMARYLAND PHILANTHROPY NETW…NATIONAL COUNCIL OF ALCOHOLISM & DRUG — $320,000 · OtherPHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC — $320,000 · OtherBALTIMORE CIVIC FUND INC — $300,000 · OtherToo Young to Wed Inc — $320,998 · OtherACLU FOUNDATION OF MARYLAND INC — $350,000 · Other+38 more — $4,762,425 · Other+38 moreELEV8BALTIMOREINC — $850,000 · EducationELEV8BALT…FUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC — $699,000 · EducationFUND FOR …PROGRESSIVE MARYLAND EDUCATION FUND INC — $350,000 · EducationPROGRESSI…JOURNALISM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK INC — $286,207 · EducationJOURNALIS…Yale University — $199,998 · EducationYale Univ…UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC — $145,000 · EducationBOWIE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $125,000 · Education+5 more — $389,864 · Education+5 moreRESTORATIVE RESPONSE BALTIMORE INC — $350,000 · Crime & LegalPUBLIC JUSTICE CENTER INC — $300,000 · Crime & LegalOUT For JUSTICE INC — $250,000 · Crime & LegalJustice Policy Institute — $225,000 · Crime & LegalTHE ASSOC FOR THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OF MARYLAND LTD — $175,000 · Crime & LegalTHE CAMPAIGN FOR THE FAIR SENTENCING OF YOUTH — $75,000 · Crime & LegalFREESTATE JUSTICE INC — $60,000 · Crime & LegalDisability Rights Maryland Inc dba Maryland Disability Law Center Inc — $50,000 · Crime & LegalJOB OPPORTUNITIES TASK FORCE INC — $815,000 · EmploymentBALTIMORE CORPS INC — $275,000 · EmploymentBUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS RESOURCE CENTRE — $150,000 · Employment
Environment$11,847,562Human Services$5,742,000Community Improvement$3,741,000Other$8,302,423Education$3,045,069Crime & Legal$1,485,000Employment$1,240,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $11,847,562 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetFUSION PARTNERSHIP INC — $2,186,000 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetCENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC — $1,172,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetCASA INC — $1,015,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetMARYLAND PHILANTHROPY NETWORK — $914,000 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetURBAN STRATEGIES INC — $892,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetELEV8BALTIMOREINC — $850,000 over 2y, 81% of budgetJOB OPPORTUNITIES TASK FORCE INC — $815,000 over 3y, 30% of budgetBANNER NEIGHBORHOODS COMMUNITY CORP — $710,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetFUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC — $699,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCITY OF REFUGE BALTIMORE INC — $485,000 over 1y, 59% of budgetASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $485,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBon Secours Baltimore Community Works Inc — $485,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetNO BOUNDARIES COALITION INC — $410,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetCWI WORKS INC — $400,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRESTORATIVE RESPONSE BALTIMORE INC — $350,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetPROGRESSIVE MARYLAND EDUCATION FUND INC — $350,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetACLU FOUNDATION OF MARYLAND INC — $350,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetLIGHT OF TRUTH CENTER INC — $335,000 over 3y, 34% of budgetToo Young to Wed Inc — $320,998 over 2y, 21% of budgetPHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC — $320,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF ALCOHOLISM & DRUG — $320,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetPUBLIC JUSTICE CENTER INC — $300,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetBALTIMORE CIVIC FUND INC — $300,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBaltimore Safe Haven Corp — $290,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetJOURNALISM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK INC — $286,207 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBALTIMORE CORPS INC — $275,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetCHARM CITY CARE CONNECTION INC — $265,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetORGANIZING BLACK INC — $250,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetBaltimore Action Legal Team Inc — $250,000 over 1y, 58% of budgetOUT For JUSTICE INC — $250,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetPROGRESSIVE MULTIPLIER FUND — $225,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetJustice Policy Institute — $225,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetBUSINESS VOLUNTEERS MARYLAND INC — $220,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetBMORE EMPOWERED INC — $215,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetPOWER INSIDE INC — $200,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetHOLISTIC LIFE FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetRAZOM INC — $200,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBALTIMORE HARM REDUCTION COALITION INC — $200,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetJEWS UNITED FOR JUSTICE INC — $200,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetBALTIMORE BEAT INC — $200,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetYale University — $199,998 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC — $180,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ASSOC FOR THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OF MARYLAND LTD — $175,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetWITNESS INC — $150,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetBLACK GIRLS VOTE 4 HER INC — $150,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $150,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS RESOURCE CENTRE — $150,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation to Promote…The Abell Foundation …Annie E Casey Foundat…Baltimore Community F…France-Merrick Founda…Fund for Educational …The United Way of Cen…Zanvyl and Isabelle K…The Harry and Jeanett…T Rowe Price Foundati…Associated Jewish Cha…The Jacob and Hilda B…
Foundation to Promote Open SocietyNY87.4× affinity45 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation to Promote Open Society · The Abell Foundation Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Zanvyl and Isabelle Krieger Fund Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Foundation · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · The Jacob and Hilda Blaustein Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alliance for Open Society Int'L Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 210%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Cwi Works Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Civic Works Inc — 63% of income from government
  • Disability Rights Maryland Inc dba Maryland Disability Law Center Inc — 49% of income from government
  • Baltimore Healthy Start Inc — 43% of income from government
  • Center for Urban Families Inc — 36% of income from government
  • Baltimore Safe Haven Corp — 28% of income from government
  • Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Baltimore Corps Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Voices of Hope Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Banner Neighborhoods Community Corp — 6% of income from government
  • Public Justice Center Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Restorative Response Baltimore Inc — 4% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Bon Secours Baltimore Community Works Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Wide Angle Youth Media Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Digital Harbor Foundation — 2% of income from government
  • Franciscan Center Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Fund for Educational Excellence Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Holistic Life Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
21get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines