· Private foundation
Citybridge Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k37 grants · $96k
- $10k–50k22 grants · $454k
- $50k–250k22 grants · $1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Education Forward DC | $150,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $125,000 |
| Teach For America - DC Region | $125,000 |
| Emory University | $100,000 |
| KIPP Foundation | $100,000 |
| DC Education Equity Fund | $100,000 |
| Rocketship Education | $100,000 |
| Junior Achievement Of Greater Washington | $100,000 |
| Lawyers Committee For Civil Rights Under Law | $100,000 |
| KIPP Foundation - Opportunity Fund - Year 1 | $100,000 |
| KIPP New Orleans Schools | $70,000 |
| GOODProjects | $65,000 |
| DC College Access Program | $50,000 |
| Girls Global Academy | $50,000 |
| Statesmen College Preparatory Academy For Boys PCS | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–20, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +80% since the first grant, against +47% for the ones you funded once.
49 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2020, 9 since wound down; 40 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KDKIPP DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS4× · 2017–2020 · $655k · revenue +112%
ROCKETSHIP EDUCATION4× · 2017–2020 · $425k · revenue +95%- KFKIPP FOUNDATION4× · 2017–2020 · $350k · revenue +143%
Funded once
- CCCITYSCHOOLS COLLABORATIVEone grant, 2017 · $1.7M · revenue -15%
- MSMONUMENTAL SCHOLARS FUNDone grant, 2017 · $100k
- DLDC LANGUAGE IMMERSION PROJECT INCone grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue -97%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wla combines best practices in teaching and learning, with the latest in educational technology to create an unparalleled high school experience. students will graduate from wla prepared for college, career, and lives of public leadership.
Center city public charter schools (center city pcs) empowers our students for lifelong success by building strong character, promoting academic excellence, and generating public service throughout washington, d.c.
Two rivers mission: to nurture a diverse group of students to become lifelong, active participants in their own education, develop a sense of self and community, and become responsible and compassionate members of society.
The organization's mission is to enable a diverse group of children to meet high expectations, develop creativity, critical thinking, problem solving skills, and achieve a deep understanding of complex subjects, while acquiring a love of…
To prepare students to succeed in competitive colleges and to empower them to use public policy to create a more just, free, and equal world.
Capitol Hill Day School is a co-educational independent school serving students from pre-kindergarten through 8th grade. Capitol Hill Day School deeply engages a diverse community of students in connecting the classroom with the larger…
Provide students with the academic foundation and ambition to earn a college degree.
A professional learning community of master teachers and teacher residents who ensure that a diverse group of students achieve their potential as accomplished learners, thoughtful citizens, and imaginative and inquisitive problem solvers…
To educate responsible citizen scholars for success in the college of their choice and a life of active citizenship.
The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…
Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.
The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Achievement Preparatory Academy Public Charter School and the most unlike its peers is Standardswork Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
116 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 116 of the 146 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CITYSCHOOLS COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds KIPP DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds ROCKETSHIP EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds KIPP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION FORWARD DC ↗
- Who funds KIPP OF NEW ORLEANS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW SCHOOLS FUND ↗
- Who funds DC PREPARATORY ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds DC PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COLLEGE ACCESS PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law ↗
- Who funds GOOD PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL JUSTICE PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds WHITE TRUCK CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MONUMENT ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE TRACK ↗
- Who funds GIRLS GLOBAL ACADEMY PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds DIGITAL PIONEERS ACADEMY PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds STATESMEN COLLEGE PREPARATORY ACADEMY FOR BOYS ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds I DREAM PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL VILLAGE PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PAVE INC DBA PARENTS AMPLIFYING VOICES IN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds DC LANGUAGE IMMERSION PROJECT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Clark Charitable Foundation Inc Dba a James & Alice B Clark Foundation · Education Forward DC · New Schools Fund · Cityschools Collaborative · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Walton Family Foundation Inc · Gates Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Flamboyan Foundation Inc · Charter Fund Inc D/B/A Charter School Growth Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Citybridge Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Standardswork Inc — 53% of income from government
- Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
- A Wider Circle Inc — 6% of income from government
- Fund for Educational Excellence Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Citybridge Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Citybridge Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.